본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

f5

Compare original and rewritten academic text to check that citations, statistics, and core claims remain intact. Receive a report covering writing quality, scholarly tone, and whether the changes should be approved, reviewed, or rejected.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Humanization Quality Verifier - Ensures transformation integrity and quality Validates that humanization preserves meaning, citations, and academic standards Use when: after G6 transformation, before final export, for quality assurance Triggers: verify humanization, check transformation, validate changes

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Check citations after rewriting academic text
  • Compare statistical values before and after editing
  • Review changes to claims and conclusions
  • Verify academic tone before final export

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Humanization Verifier

Agent ID: F5 Category: F - Quality VS Level: Low (Verification-focused) Tier: Support Icon: ✅ Model Tier: LOW (Haiku)

Overview

Verifies that humanization transformations maintain academic integrity, preserve critical elements, and improve overall writing quality. This is the final quality gate before improved content is exported.

Core Functions

1. Citation Integrity Check

Verifies all citations remain intact and accurate:

checks:
  - count_match: "Same number of citations before/after"
  - format_preserved: "(Author, year) format maintained"
  - content_accurate: "No citation content changed"
  - placement_logical: "Citations still support correct claims"

output:
  citations_before: 15
  citations_after: 15
  all_intact: true
  issues: []

2. Statistical Accuracy Check

Ensures all numerical values are unchanged:

checks:
  - p_values: "All p-values identical"
  - effect_sizes: "All d, r, η² unchanged"
  - sample_sizes: "All N, n unchanged"
  - test_statistics: "All t, F, χ² unchanged"
  - percentages: "All % unchanged"
  - confidence_intervals: "All CI unchanged"

output:
  statistics_before: 23
  statistics_after: 23
  all_intact: true
  issues: []

3. Meaning Preservation Check

Validates core claims are unchanged:

checks:
  - main_findings: "Key findings preserved"
  - conclusions: "Conclusions unchanged"
  - methodology_claims: "Method descriptions accurate"
  - causal_claims: "No new causal language added"
  - hedge_appropriateness: "Hedging matches evidence"

assessment:
  meaning_preserved: true
  confidence: 95%
  flagged_changes: []

4. Writing Quality Improvement Check

Re-runs G5 analysis on transformed text:

comparison:
  original:
    writing_quality: 33%
    patterns_detected: 18
    high_priority: 5
    medium_priority: 9
    low_priority: 4

  improved:
    writing_quality: 72%
    patterns_detected: 4
    high_priority: 0
    medium_priority: 2
    low_priority: 2

  improvement:
    quality_gain: 39%
    pattern_reduction: 78%
    effective: true

5. Academic Tone Check

Ensures scholarly voice is maintained:

checks:
  - formality: "Appropriate formality level"
  - objectivity: "Objective tone preserved"
  - precision: "Technical precision maintained"
  - consistency: "Consistent voice throughout"

assessment:
  tone_appropriate: true
  issues: []

Input Requirements

Required:
  - original_text: "Text before humanization"
  - humanized_text: "Text after G6 transformation"
  - transformation_log: "G6 change record"

Optional:
  - section_type: "abstract/methods/discussion/etc."
  - strictness: "low/medium/high"

Output Format

## Humanization Verification Report

### Summary

| Check | Status | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| Citation Integrity | Pass | 15/15 citations preserved |
| Statistical Accuracy | Pass | 23/23 values unchanged |
| Meaning Preservation | Pass | Core claims intact |
| Writing Quality Improvement | Pass | 33% → 72% (+39%) |
| Academic Tone | Pass | Scholarly voice maintained |

### Overall Verdict: ✅ APPROVED

---

### Detailed Results

#### Citation Integrity

✅ All 15 citations preserved ✅ Format consistent ✅ Placement logical


#### Statistical Accuracy

✅ All p-values unchanged ✅ All effect sizes unchanged ✅ All sample sizes unchanged ✅ All test statistics unchanged


#### Meaning Preservation

✅ Main findings preserved ✅ Conclusions unchanged ✅ No meaning distortion detected Confidence: 95%


#### Writing Quality Improvement

Before: 33% writing quality (18 patterns) After: 72% writing quality (4 patterns) Improvement: +39% quality, 78% pattern reduction


#### Academic Tone

✅ Formal register maintained ✅ Objective voice preserved ✅ Technical precision intact


---

### Flagged Items (Review Recommended)

None

---

### 🟡 CHECKPOINT: CP_HUMANIZATION_VERIFY (Optional)

Verification complete. Ready for export?

[A] Approve and export
[B] Review specific changes
[C] Revert to original

Verification Strictness Levels

Low Strictness

  • Basic citation count match
  • Statistical value presence check
  • Major meaning changes only

Medium Strictness (Default)

  • Full citation verification
  • Statistical value comparison
  • Meaning preservation analysis
  • AI reduction check

High Strictness

  • Deep citation context analysis
  • Statistical formatting verification
  • Sentence-level meaning comparison
  • Tone consistency analysis
  • Academic style guide compliance

Error Handling

Critical Failures (Auto-Reject)

critical_failures:
  - citation_missing: "Any citation removed"
  - citation_altered: "Citation content changed"
  - statistic_modified: "Any number changed"
  - meaning_reversed: "Claim direction changed"

action: "REJECT transformation, revert to original"

Warnings (Flag for Review)

warnings:
  - hedge_changed: "Hedging level modified"
  - emphasis_shifted: "Emphasis moved"
  - structure_altered: "Sentence structure significantly changed"
  - quality_improvement_low: "Less than 20% writing quality improvement"

action: "FLAG for user review"

Acceptable Changes

acceptable:
  - vocabulary_substitution: "AI words replaced"
  - phrase_simplification: "Verbose phrases shortened"
  - punctuation_normalization: "Em dashes, quotes normalized"
  - transition_variation: "Transition words varied"

Prompt Template

You are an academic writing quality verifier.

Compare the original and humanized texts to verify transformation quality:

[Original Text]: {original}
[Humanized Text]: {humanized}
[Transformation Log]: {log}
[Section Type]: {section_type}

Perform the following verification checks:

1. **Citation Integrity**
   - Count citations in both versions
   - Verify each citation is preserved
   - Check format consistency
   - Confirm logical placement

2. **Statistical Accuracy**
   - Extract all numerical values from original
   - Verify identical values in humanized
   - Flag any discrepancies

3. **Meaning Preservation**
   - Identify main claims in original
   - Verify claims preserved in humanized
   - Check for unintended meaning changes
   - Assess hedge appropriateness

4. **Writing Quality Improvement**
   - Estimate writing quality score (before/after)
   - Count remaining patterns
   - Calculate improvement percentage

5. **Academic Tone**
   - Assess formality level
   - Check objectivity
   - Verify consistency

Output a verification report with:
- Pass/Fail status for each check
- Specific issues found
- Overall recommendation (Approve/Review/Reject)

Integration with Pipeline

G6-AcademicStyleHumanizer
        │
        ▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
│  F5-HumanizationVerifier (THIS AGENT) │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────┐  │
│  │ 1. Citation Integrity    ✅/❌  │  │
│  │ 2. Statistical Accuracy  ✅/❌  │  │
│  │ 3. Meaning Preservation  ✅/❌  │  │
│  │ 4. AI Pattern Reduction  ✅/❌  │  │
│  │ 5. Academic Tone         ✅/❌  │  │
│  └─────────────────────────────────┘  │
│                 │                     │
│                 ▼                     │
│         All Pass? ──Yes──> Export    │
│              │                        │
│             No                        │
│              │                        │
│              ▼                        │
│     🟡 CP_HUMANIZATION_VERIFY        │
│     User review required              │
└───────────────────────────────────────┘

Commands

"Verify humanization"
→ Full verification report

"Quick verification check"
→ Summary only

"Check citation integrity"
→ Citation-specific check

"Verify statistics preserved"
→ Statistical-specific check

"Compare meaning before/after"
→ Meaning preservation check

Related Agents

  • G5-AcademicStyleAuditor: Provides AI pattern analysis
  • G6-AcademicStyleHumanizer: Creates text this agent verifies
  • G2-PublicationSpecialist: Related quality checks (absorbed F1)
  • X1-ResearchGuardian: Related integrity checks (absorbed F4)

References

  • Humanization Pipeline: ../../research-coordinator/core/humanization-pipeline.md
  • G5 Agent: ../G5-academic-style-auditor/SKILL.md
  • G6 Agent: ../G6-academic-style-humanizer/SKILL.md
  • User Checkpoints: ../../research-coordinator/interaction/user-checkpoints.md

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고