본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Finding Open Access Papers

Find legally available free versions of paywalled papers using a DOI, the paper's identifier. Unpaywall provides access links and manuscript versions, helping retrieve PDFs and record where each accessible copy came from.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use Unpaywall API to find free full-text versions of paywalled papers

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Find free full text after reaching a paywall
  • Find papers unavailable in PubMed Central
  • Compare published, accepted, and preprint versions
  • Record PDF sources and manuscript versions

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02 声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->

Finding Open Access Papers

Overview

Use Unpaywall to find legally available open access versions of papers that appear to be behind paywalls.

Core principle: Many paywalled papers have free versions (preprints, author manuscripts, institutional repositories). Unpaywall finds them.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • DOI resolution hits a paywall
  • Paper not available in PubMed Central
  • Publisher site requires subscription
  • Need full text for highly relevant paper (score ≥7)

Use BEFORE giving up on full text access

Unpaywall API

Simple REST API - no authentication required for reasonable usage

Basic Request

curl "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/DOI?email=YOUR_EMAIL"

Parameters:

  • DOI - The paper's DOI (URL-encoded if needed)
  • email - User's email (required, for courtesy/contact)

IMPORTANT: Ask user for their email at the start of research session. Do NOT use placeholder emails like claude@anthropic.com or researcher@example.com.

Example:

curl "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/10.1038/nature12373?email=user@example.com"

Response Format

{
  "doi": "10.1038/nature12373",
  "title": "Paper Title",
  "is_oa": true,
  "best_oa_location": {
    "url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3858213",
    "url_for_pdf": "https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3858213?pdf=render",
    "version": "publishedVersion",
    "license": "cc-by",
    "host_type": "repository"
  },
  "oa_locations": [
    {
      "url": "https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3858213",
      "version": "publishedVersion"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1234.5678",
      "version": "submittedVersion"
    }
  ]
}

Key Response Fields

is_oa (boolean)

  • true - Open access version available
  • false - No free version found

best_oa_location (object or null)

  • Unpaywall's recommended best open access source
  • Prioritizes published versions over preprints
  • Includes PDF URL when available

oa_locations (array)

  • All known open access locations
  • Includes repositories, preprint servers, institutional sites
  • Ordered by quality/version

version types:

  • publishedVersion - Final published version (best)
  • acceptedVersion - Author's accepted manuscript (good)
  • submittedVersion - Preprint before peer review (useful)

Implementation Pattern

1. Check Unpaywall After Paywall Hit

# Try DOI first
curl -L "https://doi.org/10.1234/example.2023"

# If paywall detected (403, subscription required, etc):
curl "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/10.1234/example.2023?email=your@email.com"

2. Extract Best URL

# Parse JSON response
response=$(curl -s "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/DOI?email=EMAIL")

# Check if OA available
is_oa=$(echo $response | jq -r '.is_oa')

if [ "$is_oa" = "true" ]; then
  # Get best PDF URL
  pdf_url=$(echo $response | jq -r '.best_oa_location.url_for_pdf // .best_oa_location.url')

  # Download
  curl -L -o "papers/paper.pdf" "$pdf_url"
fi

3. Report to User

When OA found:

⚠️ Paper behind paywall at publisher
✓ Found open access version via Unpaywall!
   Source: Europe PMC (published version)
   PDF: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3858213?pdf=render
   → Downloading...

When no OA found:

⚠️ Paper behind paywall at publisher
✗ No open access version found via Unpaywall
   Options:
   - Request via institutional access
   - Contact authors for preprint
   - Continue with abstract only

4. Prioritize by Version

If multiple locations available:

Priority order:

  1. publishedVersion from publisher or PMC
  2. acceptedVersion from institutional repository
  3. submittedVersion from preprint server (arXiv, bioRxiv)

Integration with evaluating-paper-relevance

Add to full text fetching workflow:

Stage 2: Fetch Full Text

Try in order:
A. PubMed Central (free full text)
B. DOI resolution → If paywall, try Unpaywall
C. Unpaywall direct lookup
D. Preprints (bioRxiv, arXiv)

Updated workflow:

# 1. Try PMC
pmc_result=$(curl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/...")
if has_pmc_fulltext; then
  fetch_pmc
  exit 0
fi

# 2. Try DOI
doi_result=$(curl -L "https://doi.org/$doi")
if is_paywall; then
  # 3. Try Unpaywall
  unpaywall_result=$(curl "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/$doi?email=$EMAIL")
  if has_oa; then
    fetch_unpaywall_pdf
    exit 0
  fi
fi

# 4. No full text available
report_no_fulltext

Rate Limiting

Free tier (with email):

  • 100,000 requests per day
  • No hard rate limit, but be respectful
  • Include email in requests (required)

Best practices:

  • Add 100ms delay between requests
  • Cache responses (don't re-check same DOI)
  • Only check for papers you actually need

Python Helper Example

import requests
import time

def find_open_access(doi, email):
    """
    Find open access version via Unpaywall
    Returns: (pdf_url, version, source) or (None, None, None)
    """
    url = f"https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/{doi}"
    params = {"email": email}

    try:
        response = requests.get(url, params=params, timeout=10)
        response.raise_for_status()
        data = response.json()

        if not data.get('is_oa'):
            return None, None, None

        best_loc = data.get('best_oa_location')
        if not best_loc:
            return None, None, None

        pdf_url = best_loc.get('url_for_pdf') or best_loc.get('url')
        version = best_loc.get('version', 'unknown')
        source = best_loc.get('host_type', 'unknown')

        return pdf_url, version, source

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error checking Unpaywall for {doi}: {e}")
        return None, None, None

# Usage
doi = "10.1038/nature12373"
pdf_url, version, source = find_open_access(doi, "researcher@example.com")

if pdf_url:
    print(f"Found {version} at {source}")
    print(f"PDF: {pdf_url}")
    # Download PDF
    response = requests.get(pdf_url)
    with open(f'papers/{doi.replace("/", "_")}.pdf', 'wb') as f:
        f.write(response.content)
else:
    print("No open access version found")

time.sleep(0.1)  # Rate limiting

Common Sources Found

Repositories:

  • Europe PMC / PubMed Central
  • Institutional repositories (university sites)
  • PubMed Central international mirrors

Preprint servers:

  • bioRxiv (biology)
  • medRxiv (medicine)
  • arXiv (physics, CS, math)
  • ChemRxiv (chemistry)

Publisher sites:

  • Open access journals
  • Hybrid journals (OA articles in subscription journals)
  • Delayed open access (embargo expired)

Error Handling

DOI not found:

{
  "error": "true",
  "message": "DOI not found"
}

→ Check DOI format, try alternative identifiers

Network errors:

  • Retry with exponential backoff
  • Maximum 3 attempts
  • Report to user if all fail

Malformed response:

  • Check for is_oa field
  • Fallback to oa_locations array if best_oa_location missing

Quick Reference

TaskCommand
Check if OA availablecurl "https://api.unpaywall.org/v2/DOI?email=EMAIL"
Get best PDF URLParse .best_oa_location.url_for_pdf
List all OA sourcesParse .oa_locations[]
Check version typeLook at .version field
Download PDFcurl -L -o paper.pdf "$pdf_url"

Integration Points

Called by:

  • evaluating-paper-relevance - When full text not in PMC
  • answering-research-questions - For highly relevant papers

Updates:

  • papers-reviewed.json - Note if OA found
  • SUMMARY.md - Include OA source info

Common Mistakes

Using placeholder email: Using claude@anthropic.com or researcher@example.com → Ask user for their real email Not including email: Required parameter, requests will fail Checking every paper: Only check when needed (score ≥7, no PMC) Ignoring version type: Published version better than preprint Single source only: Check oa_locations array for alternatives No rate limiting: Add delays even though no hard limit

Success Criteria

Successful when:

  • Paywalled paper's OA version found and downloaded
  • Version type recorded (published/accepted/submitted)
  • User informed about source and version
  • Fallback options provided if no OA available

Next Steps

After finding OA version:

  • Download PDF to papers/ folder
  • Note source and version in SUMMARY.md
  • Continue with deep dive analysis
  • If no OA: note in summary, continue with abstract only

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고