본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

help

Find your way around Diverga with a guide to its 24 research agents across nine categories. View commands, example requests, direct invocation syntax, and checkpoints where people review research decisions, with recommendations based on research context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Diverga help guide - displays all 24 agents across 9 categories, commands, and usage examples. Triggers: help, guide, how to use, 도움말

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Explore Diverga's research agents
  • Find commands for setup and diagnostics
  • Choose an agent for a research task
  • Check where human review is required

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md15.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/diverga:help

Version: 2.0.0 Trigger: /diverga:help

Description

Displays comprehensive guide for Diverga, including all 24 agents across 9 categories, commands, and usage examples.

Output

When user invokes /diverga:help, display:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                     Diverga v11.0 Help                           ║
║         AI Research Assistant - 24 Agents, 9 Categories          ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        QUICK START                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Just describe your research:                                     │
│   "I want to conduct a meta-analysis on AI in education"        │
│   "Help me design a qualitative study"                          │
│   "메타분석 연구를 시작하고 싶어"                                  │
│                                                                  │
│ Diverga auto-detects context and activates relevant agents.      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                         COMMANDS                                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ /diverga:setup          Initial configuration wizard            │
│ /diverga:doctor         System diagnostics & health check       │
│ /diverga:help           This help guide                         │
│ /diverga:meta-analysis  Meta-analysis workflow (C5)             │
│ /diverga:humanize       Humanization pipeline (G5+G6+F5)       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY A: FOUNDATION (3 agents)                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:a1  ResearchQuestionRefiner     Refine research Qs      │
│ diverga:a2  TheoreticalFrameworkArchitect  Frameworks + Critique │
│             + Visualization (absorbed A3, A6)                    │
│ diverga:a5  ParadigmWorldviewAdvisor    Ontology + Ethics       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY B: EVIDENCE (2 agents)                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:b1  LiteratureReviewStrategist  Literature search       │
│ diverga:b2  EvidenceQualityAppraiser    RoB, GRADE appraisal    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         CATEGORY C: DESIGN & META-ANALYSIS (4 agents)            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:c1  QuantitativeDesignConsultant  Quant design          │
│             + Materials + Sampling (absorbed C4, D1)             │
│ diverga:c2  QualitativeDesignConsultant   Qual design           │
│             + Ethnography + Action Research (absorbed H1, H2)    │
│ diverga:c3  MixedMethodsDesignConsultant  Mixed methods         │
│ diverga:c5  MetaAnalysisMaster ⭐         Meta-analysis lead    │
│             + Data/Effect/Error/Sensitivity (absorbed C6,C7,B3,E5)│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            CATEGORY D: DATA COLLECTION (2 agents)                │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:d2  DataCollectionSpecialist    Interview + Observation  │
│             (absorbed D3, renamed)                               │
│ diverga:d4  MeasurementInstrumentDeveloper  Instrument dev      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY E: ANALYSIS (3 agents)                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:e1  QuantitativeAnalysisGuide   Statistical guidance    │
│             + Code Gen + Sensitivity (absorbed E4, E5)           │
│ diverga:e2  QualitativeCodingSpecialist  Qualitative coding     │
│ diverga:e3  MixedMethodsIntegration     Integration methods     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               CATEGORY F: QUALITY (1 agent)                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:f5  HumanizationVerifier        Verify humanization     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            CATEGORY G: COMMUNICATION (4 agents)                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:g1  JournalMatcher              Match journals          │
│ diverga:g2  PublicationSpecialist       Writing + Review + PreReg│
│             + Quality (absorbed G3, G4, F1, F2, F3)             │
│ diverga:g5  AcademicStyleAuditor        AI pattern detection    │
│ diverga:g6  AcademicStyleHumanizer      Humanize AI text        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY I: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (4 agents)            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:i0  ReviewPipelineOrchestrator  Pipeline coordination   │
│ diverga:i1  PaperRetrievalAgent         Multi-database fetch    │
│ diverga:i2  ScreeningAssistant          AI-PRISMA screening     │
│ diverga:i3  RAGBuilder                  Vector DB + Parallel    │
│             (absorbed B5)                                        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY X: CROSS-CUTTING (1 agent)                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:x1  ResearchGuardian            Ethics + Bias detection │
│             (absorbed A4, F4)                                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    HUMAN CHECKPOINTS                             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🔴 REQUIRED (System STOPS):                                      │
│    CP_PARADIGM       Research paradigm selection                 │
│    CP_METHODOLOGY    Methodology approval                        │
│                                                                  │
│ 🟠 RECOMMENDED (System PAUSES):                                  │
│    CP_THEORY         Theory framework selection                  │
│    CP_DATA_VALIDATION Data extraction validation                │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   MODEL ROUTING                                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ HIGH (Opus):   A1,A2,A5,C1,C2,C3,C5,D4,E1,E2,E3,G6,I0         │
│ MEDIUM (Sonnet): B1,B2,D2,G1,G2,G5,X1,I1,I2                     │
│ LOW (Haiku):   F5,I3                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 AUTO-TRIGGER KEYWORDS                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ "research question", "RQ", "연구 질문"        → diverga:a1      │
│ "theoretical framework", "이론적 프레임워크"  → diverga:a2      │
│ "critique", "devil's advocate", "반론"       → diverga:a2      │
│ "IRB", "ethics", "연구 윤리"                 → diverga:x1      │
│ "meta-analysis", "메타분석", "효과크기"       → diverga:c5      │
│ "systematic review", "PRISMA"               → diverga:b1      │
│ "qualitative", "interview", "질적 연구"      → diverga:c2      │
│ "ethnography", "action research"            → diverga:c2      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

For more info: https://github.com/HosungYou/Diverga

Direct Agent Invocation

Users can invoke specific agents:

diverga:c5   # Invoke Meta-Analysis Master directly
diverga:a1   # Invoke Research Question Refiner

Implementation Notes

  • Help content adapts to user's language preference
  • Agent recommendations based on detected research context
  • Links to GitHub for full documentation

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고