본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

humanizer

Review academic drafts for 24 common AI writing patterns and revise awkward wording or repetitive structures. Preserve meaning, economics terminology, citations, and LaTeX commands, with a report showing the changes and their locations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Strip AI writing patterns from text. Checks 24 patterns across 4 categories (structural, lexical, rhetorical, formatting) with academic economics adaptation. This skill should be used on any text that reads too "AI-generated", or as a final pass on drafted sections. Triggers on "humanize", "de-AI", "make it sound natural", or "strip AI patterns".

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Polishing an academic draft before submission
  • Varying repetitive transitions and paragraph structures
  • Editing economics papers while preserving terms and citations
  • Reviewing revisions with a change report

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Humanizer

Strip AI writing patterns from academic text while preserving economics content and formal structure.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to file to humanize.


Workflow

Step 1: Read the File

Read the target file from $ARGUMENTS. Support .tex, .md, .txt, and .qmd files.

Step 2: Scan for AI Patterns

Check all 24 patterns across 4 categories:

Category 1: Structural Tics (6 patterns)

  1. Triplet lists — "X, Y, and Z" appearing 3+ times in a section
  2. Formulaic transitions — "Moreover", "Furthermore", "Additionally" as sentence starters
  3. Echo conclusions — final paragraph restates every point
  4. Uniform paragraph length — all paragraphs suspiciously similar in length
  5. Topic sentence + support — every paragraph follows identical structure
  6. Numbered/bulleted reasoning — "First... Second... Third..." in prose

Category 2: Lexical Tells (6 patterns)

  1. "Delve" — almost never used by humans in academic writing
  2. "Landscape" — as metaphor ("the policy landscape")
  3. "Crucial/pivotal/vital" — overused intensifiers
  4. "Multifaceted" — AI favourite
  5. "Underscores" — as verb ("this underscores the importance")
  6. "Navigate" — metaphorical ("navigate the challenges")

Category 3: Rhetorical Patterns (6 patterns)

  1. Excessive hedging — "it is worth noting", "interestingly", "arguably"
  2. Performative enthusiasm — "fascinating", "remarkable", "exciting"
  3. False balance — "while X, it is also true that Y" for every claim
  4. Hollow acknowledgment — "this raises important questions" without answering them
  5. Premature synthesis — summarising before enough evidence is presented
  6. Universal agreement — "scholars agree", "it is widely recognised"

Category 4: Formatting Tells (6 patterns)

  1. Over-signposting — "In this section, we will discuss..."
  2. Excessive parallelism — every sentence in a list has identical structure
  3. Definitional opening — starting sections with dictionary-style definitions
  4. Disclaimer stacking — multiple caveats before making a point
  5. Summary before content — "This section covers X, Y, and Z" at the start
  6. Colon-list pattern — "There are three key factors: (1)... (2)... (3)..."

Step 3: Apply Fixes

For each detected pattern:

  1. Identify the specific instance with line number
  2. Rewrite to sound more natural/human
  3. Preserve the academic content and meaning

Academic Economics Adaptation Rules

  • Preserve formal structure where genuinely needed (equations, proofs, identification arguments)
  • Keep technical terms — do not simplify econometric vocabulary (heteroskedasticity-robust, LSOA fixed effects, hedonic pricing, etc.)
  • Maintain citation density — do not remove scholarly references
  • Vary sentence structure — mix short and long, simple and complex
  • Allow imperfection — real writing has slight asymmetries and personality
  • Respect economics conventions — "we estimate", "we find", "column (3) shows" are standard, not AI patterns
  • Keep LaTeX intact — do not modify \textcite{}, \parencite{}, \label{}, \ref{}, or equation environments

Step 4: Report Changes

Present a summary of changes:

## Humanizer Report: [filename]
**Patterns found:** N / 24
**Changes made:** N

| # | Pattern | Category | Location | Change |
|---|---------|----------|----------|--------|
| 1 | Triplet lists | Structural | Section 3, para 2 | Varied list lengths |
| 2 | "Delve" | Lexical | Line 47 | Replaced with "examine" |
...

Step 5: Save

Overwrite the original file with the humanised version (the user can review via git diff).


Principles

  • Preserve meaning. The content must be identical — only the expression changes.
  • Do not over-correct. Some formal academic patterns are normal, not AI tells.
  • Context-aware. "Moreover" in a proof derivation is fine. "Moreover" as every paragraph opener is not.
  • Reversible. User can always git checkout to undo.
  • Light touch for good writing. If only 2-3 patterns found, the text is probably fine. Focus effort on heavily AI-patterned text.
  • Economics-aware. Standard economics phrasing ("we exploit variation in...", "we instrument...") is conventional, not AI-generated.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고