본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

lifelines

Analyze time until events such as recovery or relapse using Python. Account for censored observations, where the event has not been observed, create survival curves, compare groups, and estimate risk factors with Cox regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Complete survival analysis library in Python. Handles right-censored data, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression. Standard for clinical trial analysis and epidemiology.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Analyzing time to death or disease progression in clinical trials
  • Comparing survival curves across treatment groups
  • Estimating risk factors with Cox regression
  • Studying time to infection or recovery

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Lifelines - Survival Analysis

In medicine, we often care about "Time to Event" (death, recovery, relapse). Lifelines handles the complexity of "censored" data (patients who left the study).

When to Use

  • Analyzing clinical trial data (time to death, disease progression).
  • Comparing survival between treatment groups.
  • Identifying risk factors using Cox Proportional Hazards regression.
  • Building survival models for prognosis.
  • Epidemiology studies (time to infection, recovery).

Core Principles

Censoring

Patients who haven't experienced the event by the end of the study are "censored". Lifelines properly accounts for this.

Hazard Ratios

In Cox regression, a hazard ratio > 1 means increased risk; < 1 means decreased risk.

Survival Curves

Kaplan-Meier estimates the probability of survival over time without assuming a distribution.

Quick Reference

Standard Imports

from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter, CoxPHFitter
from lifelines.statistics import logrank_test
import pandas as pd

Basic Patterns

# 1. Kaplan-Meier (Visualizing survival)
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
kmf.fit(durations=df['days'], event_observed=df['died'])
kmf.plot_survival_function()
kmf.median_survival_time_  # Time when 50% have died

# 2. Cox Proportional Hazards (Risk factors)
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df, duration_col='days', event_col='died')
cph.print_summary() # See hazard ratios for age, drug type, etc.
cph.plot_partial_effects_on_outcome(covariates=['age'], values=[30, 50, 70])

Critical Rules

✅ DO

  • Use event_observed correctly - 1 = event occurred, 0 = censored.
  • Check proportional hazards assumption - Use cph.check_assumptions() to validate Cox model.
  • Compare groups with logrank test - Statistical test for survival curve differences.
  • Plot confidence intervals - Survival estimates have uncertainty, especially with small samples.

❌ DON'T

  • Don't ignore censoring - Treating censored patients as "survived" biases results.
  • Don't use regular regression - Time-to-event data requires specialized methods.
  • Don't assume proportional hazards - If violated, use stratified Cox or parametric models.

Advanced Patterns

Comparing Multiple Groups

from lifelines.statistics import multivariate_logrank_test

# Compare survival across treatment groups
results = multivariate_logrank_test(df['days'], df['group'], df['died'])
print(results.p_value)

Parametric Models

from lifelines import WeibullFitter, ExponentialFitter

# When you need to extrapolate beyond observed data
wf = WeibullFitter()
wf.fit(df['days'], df['died'])
wf.plot()

Lifelines transforms complex survival data into actionable medical insights, enabling evidence-based decisions in clinical research and practice.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고