본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

obsidian-project-memory

Organize research project knowledge in an Obsidian vault, a folder of notes. Summarize existing repository materials, maintain paper, experiment, result, and writing notes, and synchronize daily progress without MCP or API keys.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

This skill should be used when the user asks to maintain an Obsidian knowledge base for a research project, import an existing research repository into Obsidian, keep project memory or daily notes synchronized, summarize project context into durable notes, or update experiments, results, papers, writing, and plans in an Obsidian vault without requiring MCP.

연동 도구Obsidian

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Import existing research materials into Obsidian as summaries
  • Keep daily progress and project memory synchronized
  • Connect paper notes with experiments, results, and writing
  • Archive outdated research notes and repair their links

포함된 파일(12)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB
  • references/AGENT-FIRST-IMPORT.md1.6 KB
  • references/KNOWLEDGE-CRUD.md3.8 KB
  • references/NEW-MD-INGESTION.md2.4 KB
  • references/NOTE-ROUTING.md4.4 KB
  • references/NOTE-TEMPLATES.md4.3 KB
  • references/PAPERS-TO-WRITING.md4.4 KB
  • references/SCHEMA.md2.0 KB
  • references/SCRIPT-VS-AGENT.md1.7 KB
  • references/WORKFLOW.md4.8 KB
  • scripts/project_kb.py72.6 KB
  • scripts/project_views.py7.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Obsidian Project Memory

Maintain a filesystem-first, agent-driven Obsidian knowledge base for a research project.

Default note output language follows the project's configured note_language; if no note language is configured, default to English. Keep technical terms, paper titles, and established folder names in their original form when that is clearer. Only switch note prose to another language when the user explicitly asks.

Prefer this skill when working inside a repository that:

  • already contains .claude/project-memory/registry.yaml, or
  • clearly looks like a research project and should be bound to an Obsidian vault.

Core principles

  • Use scripts for project state management.
  • Use agents for project understanding and synthesis.
  • Write only durable research knowledge into a small vault structure.
  • Do not require MCP, API keys, REST plugins, or .base artifacts.
  • Do not depend on .canvas globally, but allow literature workflows to maintain Maps/literature.canvas as a default literature graph artifact.
  • Treat internal experiment summary reports as durable result-facing notes under Results/Reports/, not as Writing/ notes.

Default vault structure

Write into this project layout only:

Research/{project-slug}/
  00-Hub.md
  01-Plan.md
  Knowledge/
  Papers/
  Experiments/
  Results/
    Reports/
  Writing/
  Daily/
  Archive/

Read references/SCHEMA.md for the exact structure and note roles.

Deterministic helper script

Use scripts/project_kb.py only for low-freedom operations such as detect, bootstrap, sync, and lifecycle management:

python3 scripts/project_kb.py detect --cwd "$PWD"
python3 scripts/project_kb.py bootstrap --cwd "$PWD" --vault-path "$OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH"
python3 scripts/project_kb.py sync --cwd "$PWD" --scope auto
python3 scripts/project_kb.py lifecycle --cwd "$PWD" --mode archive
python3 scripts/project_kb.py query-context --cwd "$PWD" --kind broad
python3 scripts/project_kb.py query-context --cwd "$PWD" --kind experiment --query freezing
python3 scripts/project_kb.py find-canonical-note --cwd "$PWD" --kind experiment --query freezing
python3 scripts/project_kb.py note-lifecycle --cwd "$PWD" --mode archive --note "Results/Old-Result.md"

Do not expect the script to understand project meaning. It manages state; it does not replace synthesis.

Read references/SCRIPT-VS-AGENT.md when deciding whether a task belongs in the script or must stay agent-driven.

Default workflow

1. Detect and bind

  1. Run scripts/project_kb.py detect --cwd "$PWD".
  2. If the repo is already bound, continue with the existing project.
  3. If the repo is not yet bound but is a strong research-project candidate, bootstrap it with project_kb.py bootstrap.

For the detailed lifecycle, read references/WORKFLOW.md.

2. Read the minimum context

Before writing anything, read only the minimum stable context:

  • .claude/project-memory/<project_id>.md
  • 00-Hub.md
  • 01-Plan.md
  • today's Daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md if it exists

If the task is about project understanding, existing docs, or historical results, load more context selectively using the references below.

3. Classify the knowledge delta

Route the current turn into one or more of these buckets:

  • knowledge
  • paper
  • experiment
  • result
  • writing
  • daily
  • project-structure

Read references/NOTE-ROUTING.md before writing.

4. Follow the default durable research path

Default path for substantive research work:

  • Papers/ -> extract reusable ideas, baselines, and project relevance
  • Experiments/ -> turn those into testable hypotheses, runbooks, or ablations
  • Results/ -> promote stable findings with evidence and interpretation
  • Results/Reports/ -> store one round or one batch's internal experiment report when a complete retrospective has been written
  • Writing/ -> externalize durable claims into reviews, proposals, drafts, slides, or rebuttal notes

Use Daily/ as chronology and staging, not the final home for durable research knowledge.

Read references/PAPERS-TO-WRITING.md when deciding how a turn should advance along this path.

5. Decide whether agent-first synthesis is required

Use agent-first import/synthesis when:

  • importing an existing repository for the first time,
  • the user says the knowledge base is empty or lacks background,
  • multiple source documents must be synthesized into stable project knowledge,
  • the project needs a durable overview, research questions, experiment map, or results summary.

In these cases, first use an agent to read key sources, then write the synthesized result back into Obsidian.

Read references/AGENT-FIRST-IMPORT.md for the recommended source-reading order.

6. Write back minimally

Always keep write-back conservative.

Write back at least:

  • today's Daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md when this turn changes project state,
  • 00-Hub.md only when recent progress or top-level status truly changes,
  • .claude/project-memory/<project_id>.md when project state changes.

Then write only the durable note that matches the bucket:

  • knowledge -> Knowledge/
  • paper -> Papers/
  • experiment -> Experiments/
  • result -> Results/
  • writing -> Writing/
  • daily -> Daily/
  • project-structure -> usually Knowledge/Project-Overview.md or Knowledge/Source-Inventory.md

Internal experiment round reports should default to:

  • Results/Reports/YYYY-MM-DD--{experiment-line}--r{round}--{purpose}.md

Read references/NOTE-TEMPLATES.md when a note needs a stable shape.

Knowledge CRUD rules

Treat the vault as a small set of canonical notes plus supporting daily context.

Create

  • Ingest new knowledge deliberately; do not equate every new Markdown file with a durable note.
  • Keep one canonical note per durable object whenever possible:
    • one stable project overview,
    • one stable experiment note per experiment line,
    • one stable result note per durable finding,
    • one stable paper note per paper.
  • For new Markdown files, default to summarize first, then route:
    • promote directly only when the file is already stable and self-contained,
    • otherwise merge into an existing canonical note or stage it in Daily/.
  • If the new durable object is a full internal experiment report, store it under Results/Reports/ and link the matching Experiments/ and canonical Results/ notes.

Read

  • Query narrowly first:
    • broad project questions -> 00-Hub.md + key Knowledge/ notes,
    • active work questions -> 01-Plan.md + today's Daily/ + project memory,
    • specific experiment/result/paper questions -> the matching canonical note first,
    • specific internal experiment retrospective -> the matching note in Results/Reports/ first.
  • Use agent synthesis only when the answer spans multiple durable sources or still depends on repo material after reading canonical notes.

Update

  • Prefer updating an existing canonical note over creating a sibling note.
  • Treat raw material as input, not as a final vault object.
  • Allow fast append-only logging in Daily/, but keep durable knowledge in Knowledge/, Papers/, Experiments/, Results/, Results/Reports/, or Writing/.

Delete

  • Treat “remove”, “delete”, or “stop using” as archive by default.
  • Purge only when the user explicitly asks for permanent deletion.
  • When archiving or purging a durable note, repair direct links in 00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, and explicit index notes so the main working surface does not point to missing files.

Safety rules

  • Do not mirror the whole repository into the vault.
  • Do not generate empty folder taxonomies or placeholder notes without real content.
  • Do not write every repo delta into a new note.
  • Do not treat every code change as a knowledge update.
  • Do not create .base files unless the user explicitly asks for them.
  • Do not create arbitrary .canvas sprawl; the main default exception is Maps/literature.canvas for literature workflows.
  • For engineering-only turns, prefer Daily/ plus project memory unless there is a real experiment, result, or planning impact.
  • Treat “remove project knowledge” as archive by default; purge only when the user explicitly asks for permanent deletion.

Reference files

Load only what is needed:

  • references/SCHEMA.md - vault structure and note roles
  • references/WORKFLOW.md - detect/bootstrap/sync/archive workflow
  • references/PAPERS-TO-WRITING.md - default handoff from literature to experiments, results, and writing
  • references/SCRIPT-VS-AGENT.md - boundary between low-freedom script operations and agent-only reasoning
  • references/KNOWLEDGE-CRUD.md - create/read/update/delete rules for durable research knowledge
  • references/NOTE-ROUTING.md - where each kind of knowledge should go
  • references/NEW-MD-INGESTION.md - how to ingest a newly created Markdown file
  • references/AGENT-FIRST-IMPORT.md - how to import an existing project with agent synthesis
  • references/NOTE-TEMPLATES.md - lightweight note shapes for common note types

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고