본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ols-regression

Plan, run, and interpret linear regression with guidance on model choices, diagnostic checks, and reporting. Python, R, and Stata examples help examine coefficients, assess assumptions, and choose standard errors that account for different error patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Specify a regression model for an empirical study
  • Check residuals and correlations among explanatory variables
  • Choose robust or clustered standard errors
  • Interpret and report regression results

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/ols-reference.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

OLS Regression Skill

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for OLS regression and linear models in empirical research. It covers model specification, assumption testing, diagnostic checks, and result interpretation, with code examples in Python, R, and Stata.

Core Workflow

When assisting with OLS regression, follow this sequence:

  1. Clarify the research question and data — understand dependent variable, key regressors, and sample
  2. Specify the model — choose functional form, control variables, fixed effects if needed
  3. Run the regression — provide code in the user's preferred language
  4. Check assumptions — run diagnostics systematically (see references)
  5. Interpret and report — explain coefficients, significance, fit, and caveats

Key Concepts

Model Specification

  • Write the regression equation explicitly: Y = β₀ + β₁X₁ + ... + βₖXₖ + ε
  • Consider log transformations for skewed variables or elasticity interpretation
  • Include relevant controls to reduce omitted variable bias
  • Watch for irrelevant variables inflating standard errors

The Gauss-Markov Assumptions

  1. Linearity in parameters
  2. Random sampling
  3. No perfect multicollinearity
  4. Zero conditional mean of errors: E(ε|X) = 0
  5. Homoskedasticity: Var(ε|X) = σ²
  6. (For inference) Normally distributed errors

Violation of assumptions 4–5 does not bias OLS but affects standard errors. Violation of assumption 4 (endogeneity) biases estimates — recommend IV methods.

Standard Error Options

  • Default OLS SE: valid only under homoskedasticity
  • HC robust SE (White): use when heteroskedasticity is suspected; always safe for cross-section data
  • Clustered SE: use when observations are grouped (e.g., by firm, region, year)
  • Newey-West SE: use for time series with autocorrelation

Quick Code Templates

Python (statsmodels)

import statsmodels.api as sm
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

# With robust standard errors
model = smf.ols('y ~ x1 + x2 + x3', data=df).fit(cov_type='HC3')
print(model.summary())

R

library(lmtest)
library(sandwich)

model <- lm(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = df)
coeftest(model, vcov = vcovHC(model, type = "HC3"))

Stata

reg y x1 x2 x3, robust

Diagnostics Checklist

Run all diagnostics after fitting. See references/ols-reference.md for full test details.

IssueTestQuick Fix
HeteroskedasticityBreusch-Pagan, White testRobust SE
AutocorrelationDurbin-Watson, Breusch-GodfreyNewey-West SE
MulticollinearityVIF > 10Drop/combine variables
Non-normality of errorsJarque-BeraCheck outliers; large N mitigates
Omitted variable biasRamsey RESETRespecify model

Reporting Standards (Academic)

  • Report coefficients with standard errors in parentheses (or t-stats)
  • Use asterisks for significance: * p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01
  • Always state which standard errors are used (robust, clustered, etc.)
  • Report R², adjusted R², N, and F-statistic
  • Describe the identification strategy and potential endogeneity concerns

For detailed test formulas, code, and extended examples, see references/ols-reference.md.

Common Pitfalls

  • Claiming causality without identification: OLS with controls does not establish causality — use IV, DID, or RDD for causal claims
  • Using default SE with clustered data: Always cluster SE at the group level when observations are grouped
  • Including "bad controls": Don't control for post-treatment variables (mediators) — they introduce collider bias
  • Log-transforming variables with zeros: ln(0) is undefined; use asinh(x) or ln(x+1) with appropriate interpretation
  • Reporting R² as evidence of a good model: High R² does not mean the model is correctly specified or causal

Related Skills & Commands

  • panel-data: If your data has repeated observations on the same units
  • iv-estimation: If you suspect endogeneity in your key regressor
  • stats: Generate summary statistics before running regressions
  • /diagnose: Run comprehensive diagnostic tests on your OLS model
  • /robustness: Design robustness checks for your specifications
  • /interpret: Get help interpreting regression output
  • table: Format regression results for publication

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고