Review existing R scripts for code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and coding standards. Produce a separate report for each script, plus a severity-based summary of findings and the three most critical issues, without changing source files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Run the comprehensive R code review protocol.
Identify scripts to review:
$ARGUMENTS is a specific .R filename: review that file only$ARGUMENTS is a name pattern (e.g., model_name): glob for matching .R files. If multiple matches, use AskUserQuestion:
$ARGUMENTS is all: review all R scripts in scripts/R/ and Figures/*/$ARGUMENTS is empty, glob for all .R files. If multiple found, use AskUserQuestion as above.For each script, launch the r-reviewer agent with instructions to:
rules/r-code-conventions.md for current standardsquality_reports/[script_name]_r_review.mdAfter all reviews complete, present a summary:
IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any R source files. Only produce reports. Fixes are applied after user review.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.