본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Searching Scientific Literature

Find scientific papers in PubMed by turning a research question into targeted search terms and synonyms. Collect titles, authors, abstracts, and identifiers into a structured paper list ready for relevance evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

PubMed search with keyword optimization, result parsing, and metadata extraction

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Finding an initial paper set for a research question
  • Searching for methods, compounds, or diseases
  • Filtering papers by date, journal, or author
  • Collecting paper metadata for relevance evaluation

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02 声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->

Searching Scientific Literature

Overview

Search PubMed for scientific literature using optimized queries. Extract metadata and prepare papers for relevance evaluation.

Core principle: Cast a wide enough net to find relevant papers, but use targeted keywords to keep results manageable.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new research question
  • User asks "find papers about..."
  • Need initial paper set for evaluation
  • Searching for specific methods, compounds, diseases, techniques

Search Strategy

1. Parse User Query

Extract:

  • Keywords: Main concepts (e.g., "BTK inhibitor", "selectivity", "kinase")
  • Data types: What user needs (IC50 values, methods, structures, results)
  • Constraints: Date ranges, specific journals, author names
  • Synonyms: Alternative terms (e.g., "Bruton's tyrosine kinase" = "BTK")

2. Construct PubMed Query

Boolean operators:

  • AND - narrow results (must have both terms)
  • OR - broaden results (either term)
  • NOT - exclude terms

Example queries:

"BTK inhibitor"[Title/Abstract] AND selectivity[Title/Abstract]

("kinase inhibitor" OR "protein kinase") AND (selectivity OR "off-target")

"ibrutinib"[Title/Abstract] AND ("IC50" OR "inhibitory concentration")

Field tags:

  • [Title/Abstract] - search title and abstract only
  • [Title] - title only (more precise)
  • [Author] - specific author
  • [Journal] - specific journal
  • [Date] - date range

3. Execute Search

API endpoint:

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?\
db=pubmed&\
term=YOUR_QUERY&\
retmax=100&\
retmode=json&\
sort=relevance

Parameters:

  • db=pubmed - search PubMed database
  • term= - your query (URL encode spaces and special chars)
  • retmax=100 - max results (start with 100)
  • retmode=json - return JSON
  • sort=relevance - most relevant first (or pub_date for newest)

Example bash:

curl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=BTK+inhibitor+selectivity&retmax=100&retmode=json&sort=relevance"

Response format:

{
  "esearchresult": {
    "count": "156",
    "retmax": "100",
    "idlist": ["12345678", "87654321", ...]
  }
}

4. Fetch Paper Metadata

API endpoint:

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?\
db=pubmed&\
id=12345678,87654321&\
retmode=json

Extract from response:

  • Title
  • Authors (list)
  • Journal name
  • Publication date
  • Abstract (via separate efetch call or use esummary)
  • PMID
  • DOI (if available in articleids)

Getting DOI from PMID:

"articleids": [
  {"idtype": "pubmed", "value": "12345678"},
  {"idtype": "doi", "value": "10.1234/example.2023"}
]

If DOI missing:

  • Use PMID as fallback identifier
  • Try to resolve DOI via PubMed Central or publisher APIs later

Output Format

Create list of paper objects:

[
  {
    "pmid": "12345678",
    "doi": "10.1234/example.2023",
    "title": "Selective BTK inhibitors for autoimmune diseases",
    "authors": ["Smith J", "Doe A", "Johnson B"],
    "journal": "Nature Chemical Biology",
    "year": "2023",
    "abstract": "We developed a series of...",
    "source": "pubmed_search"
  }
]

Error Handling

Rate limits (CRITICAL - shared across all processes/subagents):

  • No API key: 3 requests/second (official limit)
  • With API key: 10 requests/second
  • Single agent/script: Use 500ms delays (2 req/sec, safe margin)
    • 350ms is theoretically sufficient but causes ~20% HTTP 429 errors in practice
  • Multiple parallel subagents: Use longer delays to share capacity
    • 2 parallel: 1 second each (2 total req/sec)
    • 3 parallel: 1.5 seconds each (2 total req/sec)
    • 5 parallel: 2.5 seconds each (2 total req/sec)
    • Formula: delay_seconds = (num_parallel / rate_limit) + safety_margin
  • If you get HTTP 429 errors: Wait 5 seconds, resume with doubled delays

Empty results:

  • Try broader terms
  • Remove field tags
  • Check for typos
  • Use OR to add synonyms

Too many results (>500):

  • Add more specific terms
  • Use field tags to narrow
  • Add date constraints
  • Consider splitting into sub-queries

Integration with Other Skills

After search completes:

  1. Save results to research folder as initial-search-results.json
  2. For each paper, call evaluating-paper-relevance skill
  3. Track in papers-reviewed.json (use DOI as key, fallback to PMID)

Quick Reference

TaskCommand
Search PubMedcurl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=QUERY&retmax=100&retmode=json"
Get metadatacurl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=PMID1,PMID2&retmode=json"
URL encode queryReplace spaces with +, special chars with %XX
Narrow resultsUse AND, add field tags, more specific terms
Broaden resultsUse OR, remove field tags, add synonyms

Common Mistakes

Too narrow: Only 5 results → Use OR, remove constraints Too broad: 5000 results → Add AND terms, use field tags Missing abstracts: Use efetch instead of esummary for full abstract text DOI not found: Many older papers lack DOI - use PMID as fallback Rate limiting: Add 500ms delays (single agent) or longer (parallel subagents sharing rate limit)

Next Steps

After completing search:

  • Announce: "Found N papers matching query"
  • Begin evaluation using skills/research/evaluating-paper-relevance
  • Update user with progress as papers are screened

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고