본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

setup

Set up Diverga through an interactive researcher profile wizard. It records your discipline, experience, statistical tools, database access, and collaboration preferences, then saves configuration that guides explanations, code suggestions, and database recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Diverga v12.0 setup wizard. 4-step researcher profile setup. Captures discipline, experience, tools, database access, and Agent Teams + VS Arena preference. Triggers: setup, configure, 설정, install

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Setting up a Diverga researcher profile
  • Updating statistical software preferences
  • Recording available academic databases
  • Choosing multi-agent collaboration and debate modes

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md11.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/diverga:setup

Version: 12.0.0 Trigger: /diverga:setup

Description

Diverga setup wizard. 4 steps: Researcher Profile, Tools & Access, Agent Teams + VS Arena, Config Generation. Captures information that genuinely changes agent behavior.

Design Principles

  1. Only ask what agents actually use — no dead config fields
  2. Lazy config for rare features — OpenAlex email, citation format, qual software are asked when the relevant agent runs for the first time
  3. Researcher profile is stable — discipline and tools don't change per project; checkpoints handle project-specific decisions

Workflow

When user invokes /diverga:setup, execute this interactive wizard:

Step 0: Project Detection

Check for existing config:

  • If ~/.claude/plugins/diverga/config/diverga-config.json exists with researcher field → "Existing profile detected. Update?"
  • Otherwise → "New profile setup"

Step 1: Welcome + Researcher Profile

Display welcome message, then ask TWO questions using a single AskUserQuestion call:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                    Welcome to Diverga v12.0                     ║
║   AI Research Assistant - 29 Agents (24 core + 5 VS Arena)      ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║                                                                  ║
║  Diverga adapts to your background.                             ║
║  A doctoral student gets more scaffolding.                      ║
║  An experienced faculty gets concise recommendations.           ║
║  Your preferred tools determine code and database suggestions.  ║
║                                                                  ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
questions:
  - question: "What is your primary research discipline?"
    header: "Discipline"
    multiSelect: false
    options:
      - label: "Education"
        description: "Educational Technology, Curriculum, Higher Ed, STEM Ed, etc."
      - label: "Psychology"
        description: "Clinical, Developmental, Social, Cognitive, I/O, etc."
      - label: "Health Sciences"
        description: "Public Health, Nursing, Medicine, Rehabilitation, etc."
      - label: "Social Sciences"
        description: "Sociology, Political Science, Communication, Business, etc."
    # User can also type a custom discipline via "Other"

  - question: "What is your research experience level?"
    header: "Experience"
    multiSelect: false
    options:
      - label: "Doctoral Student"
        description: "Currently pursuing PhD/EdD. More guidance on methodology and analysis."
      - label: "Postdoc / Early Career"
        description: "Completed doctorate. Familiar with research process."
      - label: "Faculty / Senior Researcher"
        description: "Experienced researcher. Concise recommendations preferred."

How this affects agents:

  • Doctoral Student → A1 explains PICO/SPIDER, C1 scaffolds power analysis, E1 adds interpretation guidance
  • Faculty → Agents skip explanations, go straight to options and trade-offs
  • Discipline → G1 prioritizes field-specific journals, I1 leads with field-appropriate databases

Step 2: Tools & Institutional Access

Ask TWO questions using a single AskUserQuestion call:

questions:
  - question: "Which statistical software do you use?"
    header: "Stats Tools"
    multiSelect: true
    options:
      - label: "R"
        description: "tidyverse, lavaan, lme4, etc."
      - label: "Python"
        description: "pandas, statsmodels, scikit-learn, etc."
      - label: "SPSS"
        description: "IBM SPSS Statistics"
      - label: "Stata"
        description: "Stata/SE or Stata/MP"

  - question: "Which academic databases can you access?"
    header: "DB Access"
    multiSelect: true
    options:
      - label: "Scopus"
        description: "Elsevier Scopus (institutional subscription)"
      - label: "Web of Science"
        description: "Clarivate WoS (institutional subscription)"
      - label: "PsycINFO"
        description: "APA PsycINFO (institutional subscription)"
      - label: "ERIC + Semantic Scholar (free)"
        description: "Always available, no subscription needed"

How this affects agents:

  • Stats tools → E1 generates code ONLY in selected languages (no more 4-language output)
  • DB access → I1/I0 recommends only accessible databases at SCH_DATABASE_SELECTION checkpoint

Step 3: Agent Teams and VS Arena

question: "Configure multi-agent collaboration mode"
header: "Agent Teams"
options:
  - label: "Agent Teams + VS Arena (Recommended)"
    description: "Full parallel execution with inter-agent communication. VS Arena debates use real cross-critique between personas. Requires Claude Code v2.1.32+. Higher token usage."
  - label: "Subagents + Classic VS (Default)"
    description: "Agents run as subagents. VS Arena generates options from single agent (no cross-critique). Lower cost."
  - label: "Disabled"
    description: "No multi-agent features. Single agent execution only."

If "Agent Teams + VS Arena" selected, add to config:

{
  "agent_teams": { "enabled": true },
  "vs_arena": { "enabled": true, "team_size": 3, "cross_critique": true }
}

Also set CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 in user's settings.json env:

  1. Write to ~/.claude/settings.json:
    { "env": { "CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1" } }
    
    (merge with existing settings, don't overwrite)

If "Subagents + Classic VS" selected, add to config:

{
  "agent_teams": { "enabled": false },
  "vs_arena": { "enabled": true, "team_size": 3, "cross_critique": false }
}

If "Disabled" selected, add to config:

{
  "agent_teams": { "enabled": false },
  "vs_arena": { "enabled": false }
}

Step 4: Generate Configuration & Complete

After collecting all preferences, generate config/diverga-config.json at ~/.claude/plugins/diverga/config/:

{
  "version": "12.0.0",
  "researcher": {
    "discipline": "Education",
    "experience": "doctoral_student",
    "stats_software": ["R", "SPSS"],
    "db_access": ["Scopus", "ERIC", "Semantic Scholar"]
  },
  "agent_teams": { "enabled": true },
  "vs_arena": { "enabled": true, "team_size": 3, "cross_critique": true }
}

Experience level mapping:

  • "Doctoral Student" → "doctoral_student"
  • "Postdoc / Early Career" → "early_career"
  • "Faculty / Senior Researcher" → "faculty"

Display completion:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                  Diverga v12.0 Setup Complete!                  ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║                                                                  ║
║  Profile saved:                                                  ║
║    Discipline: Education                                        ║
║    Experience: Doctoral Student                                  ║
║    Stats: R, SPSS                                               ║
║    Databases: Scopus, ERIC, Semantic Scholar                    ║
║    Agent Teams: Enabled                                          ║
║    VS Arena: Cross-critique enabled                              ║
║                                                                  ║
║  29 agents (24 core + 5 VS Arena)                               ║
║  Agent Teams orchestrator — unified parallel and debate workflows║
║                                                                  ║
║  Quick Start:                                                    ║
║  - Just describe your research in natural language               ║
║  - "I want to conduct a systematic review on AI in education"    ║
║  - Diverga adapts to your profile automatically                  ║
║                                                                  ║
║  Commands:                                                       ║
║  - /diverga:help     - View all 29 agents                       ║
║  - /diverga:memory   - Memory system commands                    ║
║  - /diverga:setup    - Update your profile anytime               ║
║                                                                  ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Lazy Config (Agent-Level)

These settings are NOT asked during setup. Each agent asks when first needed:

SettingAgentWhen AskedStorage
OpenAlex emailG1 (Journal Matcher)First journal_search_by_field call.omc/config.json
Citation formatG2 (Publication)First manuscript generationresearcher.citation_format in config
Qualitative softwareE2 (Coding)First qualitative coding taskresearcher.qual_software in config

Lazy config prompt template (for agents to use):

When an agent needs a lazy config value that isn't set yet:

  1. Explain WHY the information is needed (1 sentence, tied to the current task)
  2. Ask via AskUserQuestion with relevant options
  3. Save to config/diverga-config.json under the researcher object
  4. Continue with the task — do NOT restart or re-prompt

Example (G1 first call):

"Journal search uses OpenAlex API. Registering your email enables
faster responses (polite pool). This is optional."
→ AskUserQuestion: [Enter email] [Skip]
→ If email: save to .omc/config.json

First-Run Detection

When a Diverga plugin session starts:

  1. Check if ~/.claude/plugins/diverga/config/diverga-config.json exists with researcher field
  2. If missing → display:
    Welcome to Diverga! Run /diverga:setup to set up your researcher profile (1 minute).
    
  3. Do NOT auto-run — only display the suggestion once.

Config Schema Reference

{
  "version": "12.0.0",
  "researcher": {
    "discipline": "string",
    "experience": "doctoral_student | early_career | faculty",
    "stats_software": ["R", "Python", "SPSS", "Stata", "Mplus"],
    "db_access": ["Scopus", "Web of Science", "PsycINFO", "ERIC", "Semantic Scholar"],
    "qual_software": "NVivo | ATLAS.ti | MAXQDA | Dedoose | manual",
    "citation_format": "APA | Chicago | Vancouver | Harvard"
  },
  "agent_teams": {
    "enabled": "boolean"
  },
  "vs_arena": {
    "enabled": "boolean",
    "team_size": "number (default 3)",
    "cross_critique": "boolean"
  }
}

Fields are added incrementally:

  • researcher.discipline, experience, stats_software, db_access — set during /diverga:setup
  • researcher.qual_software, citation_format — added by lazy config when relevant agent runs
  • agent_teams, vs_arena — set during /diverga:setup Step 3

Error Handling

If config directory doesn't exist, create it:

mkdir -p ~/.claude/plugins/diverga/config

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고