본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ui-ux-pro-max

Turn a broad UI request into concrete design rules for colors, typography, layout, and interactions. The skill provides accessibility checks and implementation guidance for the chosen framework, with saved design notes to keep multiple pages consistent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

This skill should be used when the user asks to design or review a UI, create a landing page or dashboard, choose colors or typography, improve accessibility, or implement polished frontend interfaces with a clear design system.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Define a design direction for a landing page
  • Choose dashboard colors and typography
  • Review UI accessibility and interactions
  • Keep design rules consistent across multiple pages

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • data/ui-reasoning.csv2.0 KB
  • references/USAGE.md727 B
  • scripts/search.py12.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

UI/UX Pro Max

Use this skill to turn a vague UI request into a concrete design system plus implementation guidance.

Role

This skill is for:

  • design-system selection,
  • palette and typography choices,
  • UX review and remediation,
  • stack-aware frontend implementation guidance,
  • lightweight design-system persistence for multi-page work.

It is not a replacement for product strategy or user research. Use it to make execution sharper after the product direction is already roughly known.

Core workflow

1. Infer the request shape

Extract the minimum design signals first:

  • product type,
  • industry,
  • style keywords,
  • target platform,
  • implementation stack.

If the user does not specify a stack, default to html-tailwind.

2. Generate the design system first

Use the helper script to produce a compact design recommendation:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "<product_type> <industry> <keywords>" --design-system -p "Project Name"

This produces:

  • recommended style direction,
  • palette family,
  • typography direction,
  • interaction / visual effects,
  • landing or layout bias,
  • anti-patterns to avoid.

If the work spans multiple turns or pages, persist the design system:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "<query>" --design-system --persist -p "Project Name"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "<query>" --design-system --persist -p "Project Name" --page "dashboard"

This creates:

  • design-system/MASTER.md
  • optional page-level override notes under design-system/pages/

3. Pull targeted guidance only when needed

Use a focused search instead of loading everything at once:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "glassmorphism dark" --domain style
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "animation accessibility" --domain ux
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "real-time dashboard" --domain chart
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "elegant luxury serif" --domain typography

Supported domains:

  • product
  • style
  • color
  • typography
  • landing
  • chart
  • ux

4. Add stack-specific guidance before coding

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py" "forms table responsive" --stack html-tailwind

Supported stacks:

  • html-tailwind
  • react
  • nextjs
  • vue
  • svelte
  • swiftui
  • react-native
  • flutter
  • shadcn
  • jetpack-compose

5. Synthesize before implementation

After gathering the design system, convert it into:

  • layout structure,
  • component rules,
  • visual tokens,
  • interaction rules,
  • accessibility constraints,
  • implementation notes for the chosen stack.

Do not dump raw search output into the final answer. Use it to justify a coherent design direction.

Default output shape

A good response should usually include:

  1. product and UI framing,
  2. recommended style system,
  3. palette and typography,
  4. component and layout rules,
  5. accessibility and interaction checks,
  6. stack-aware implementation notes.

Safety rules

  • Do not hardcode a design language without connecting it to the product type.
  • Do not use emoji as primary UI iconography.
  • Do not weaken text contrast for visual flair.
  • Do not scale interactive cards on hover if it destabilizes layout.
  • Do not use animation that violates prefers-reduced-motion.
  • Do not invent unsupported helper scripts or datasets; use the bundled search.py and data/ui-reasoning.csv only.

References

Load only what is needed:

  • references/USAGE.md - recommended command patterns and retrieval flow
  • data/ui-reasoning.csv - compact product-to-design heuristics used by the helper script
  • scripts/search.py - deterministic helper for design-system, domain, and stack lookup

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고