본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

web-design-reviewer

Inspect a running website at different screen sizes to find layout problems, inconsistent styling, and accessibility issues such as poor contrast. Fix the relevant source code, recheck the results, and report changes with before-and-after screenshots.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.

연동 도구Playwright

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Finding and fixing broken mobile layouts
  • Reviewing spacing, fonts, and color consistency
  • Checking contrast and keyboard focus visibility
  • Comparing screenshots before and after fixes

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • references/framework-fixes.md7.3 KB
  • references/visual-checklist.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Web Design Reviewer

This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.

Scope of Application

  • Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
  • SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
  • Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
  • CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
  • Any other web application

Prerequisites

Required

  1. Target website must be running

    • Local development server (e.g., http://localhost:3000)
    • Staging environment
    • Production environment (for read-only reviews)
  2. Browser automation must be available

    • Screenshot capture
    • Page navigation
    • DOM information retrieval
  3. Access to source code (when making fixes)

    • Project must exist within the workspace

Workflow Overview

flowchart TD
    A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
    B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
    C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
    D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
    E -->|Yes| B
    E -->|No| F[Completion Report]

Step 1: Information Gathering Phase

1.1 URL Confirmation

If the URL is not provided, ask the user:

Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g., http://localhost:3000)

1.2 Understanding Project Structure

When making fixes, gather the following information:

ItemExample Question
FrameworkAre you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.?
Styling MethodCSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc.
Source LocationWhere are style files and components located?
Review ScopeSpecific pages only or entire site?

1.3 Automatic Project Detection

Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:

Detection targets:
├── package.json     → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json    → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config  → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config      → Next.js
├── vite.config      → Vite
├── nuxt.config      → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/     → Source directory

1.4 Identifying Styling Method

MethodDetectionEdit Target
Pure CSS*.css filesGlobal CSS or component CSS
SCSS/Sass*.scss, *.sassSCSS files
CSS Modules*.module.cssModule CSS files
Tailwind CSStailwind.config.*className in components
styled-componentsstyled. in codeJS/TS files
Emotion@emotion/ importsJS/TS files
CSS-in-JS (other)Inline stylesJS/TS files

Step 2: Visual Inspection Phase

2.1 Page Traversal

  1. Navigate to the specified URL
  2. Capture screenshots
  3. Retrieve DOM structure/snapshot (if possible)
  4. If additional pages exist, traverse through navigation

2.2 Inspection Items

Layout Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Element OverflowContent overflows from parent element or viewportHigh
Element OverlapUnintended overlapping of elementsHigh
Alignment IssuesGrid or flex alignment problemsMedium
Inconsistent SpacingPadding/margin inconsistenciesMedium
Text ClippingLong text not handled properlyMedium

Responsive Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Non-mobile FriendlyLayout breaks on small screensHigh
Breakpoint IssuesUnnatural transitions when screen size changesMedium
Touch TargetsButtons too small on mobileMedium

Accessibility Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Insufficient ContrastLow contrast ratio between text and backgroundHigh
No Focus StateCannot determine state during keyboard navigationHigh
Missing alt TextNo alternative text for imagesMedium

Visual Consistency

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Font InconsistencyMixed font familiesMedium
Color InconsistencyNon-unified brand colorsMedium
Spacing InconsistencyNon-uniform spacing between similar elementsLow

2.3 Viewport Testing (Responsive)

Test at the following viewports:

NameWidthRepresentative Device
Mobile375pxiPhone SE/12 mini
Tablet768pxiPad
Desktop1280pxStandard PC
Wide1920pxLarge display

Step 3: Issue Fixing Phase

3.1 Issue Prioritization

block-beta
    columns 1
    block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
        P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
        P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
        P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
    end

3.2 Identifying Source Files

Identify source files from problematic elements:

  1. Selector-based Search

    • Search codebase by class name or ID
    • Explore style definitions with grep_search
  2. Component-based Search

    • Identify components from element text or structure
    • Explore related files with semantic_search
  3. File Pattern Filtering

    Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/*
    Components: src/components/**/*
    Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
    

3.3 Applying Fixes

Framework-specific Fix Guidelines

See references/framework-fixes.md for details.

Fix Principles

  1. Minimal Changes: Only make the minimum changes necessary to resolve the issue
  2. Respect Existing Patterns: Follow existing code style in the project
  3. Avoid Breaking Changes: Be careful not to affect other areas
  4. Add Comments: Add comments to explain the reason for fixes where appropriate

Step 4: Re-verification Phase

4.1 Post-fix Confirmation

  1. Reload browser (or wait for development server HMR)
  2. Capture screenshots of fixed areas
  3. Compare before and after

4.2 Regression Testing

  • Verify that fixes haven't affected other areas
  • Confirm responsive display is not broken

4.3 Iteration Decision

flowchart TD
    A{Issues Remaining?}
    A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
    A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]

Iteration Limit: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user


Output Format

Review Results Report

# Web Design Review Results

## Summary

| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |

## Detected Issues

### [P1] {Issue Title}

- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After

### [P2] {Issue Title}
...

## Unfixed Issues (if any)

### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}

## Recommendations

- {Suggestions for future improvements}

Required Capabilities

CapabilityDescriptionRequired
Web Page NavigationAccess URLs, page transitions✅
Screenshot CapturePage image capture✅
Image AnalysisVisual issue detection✅
DOM RetrievalPage structure retrievalRecommended
File Read/WriteSource code reading and editingRequired for fixes
Code SearchCode search within projectRequired for fixes

Reference Implementation

Implementation with Playwright MCP

Playwright MCP is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.

CapabilityPlaywright MCP ToolPurpose
Navigationbrowser_navigateAccess URLs
Snapshotbrowser_snapshotRetrieve DOM structure
Screenshotbrowser_take_screenshotImages for visual inspection
Clickbrowser_clickInteract with interactive elements
Resizebrowser_resizeResponsive testing
Consolebrowser_console_messagesDetect JS errors

Configuration Example (MCP Server)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwright": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
    }
  }
}

Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools

ToolFeatures
SeleniumBroad browser support, multi-language support
PuppeteerChrome/Chromium focused, Node.js
CypressEasy integration with E2E testing
WebDriver BiDiStandardized next-generation protocol

The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.


Best Practices

DO (Recommended)

  • ✅ Always save screenshots before making fixes
  • ✅ Fix one issue at a time and verify each
  • ✅ Follow the project's existing code style
  • ✅ Confirm with user before major changes
  • ✅ Document fix details thoroughly

DON'T (Not Recommended)

  • ❌ Large-scale refactoring without confirmation
  • ❌ Ignoring design systems or brand guidelines
  • ❌ Fixes that ignore performance
  • ❌ Fixing multiple issues at once (difficult to verify)

Troubleshooting

Problem: Style files not found

  1. Check dependencies in package.json
  2. Consider the possibility of CSS-in-JS
  3. Consider CSS generated at build time
  4. Ask user about styling method

Problem: Fixes not reflected

  1. Check if development server HMR is working
  2. Clear browser cache
  3. Rebuild if project requires build
  4. Check CSS specificity issues

Problem: Fixes affecting other areas

  1. Rollback changes
  2. Use more specific selectors
  3. Consider using CSS Modules or scoped styles
  4. Consult user to confirm impact scope

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

a1

무료

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a2

무료

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

a5

무료

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고