본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

advmat-length-management

Use when an Advanced Materials manuscript must be fit to its article-type format — Communication versus Research Article — where word count and display items are budgeted together against a typeset page limit. Manages the length budget; does not restructure the science or polish prose line by line.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Advanced Materials Length Management (advmat-length-management)

When to trigger

  • You are unsure whether the work is a Communication or a full Research Article
  • The manuscript overruns the typeset page limit for its article type
  • Figures/schemes are large and you must trade display items against text
  • A reviewer or editor asked you to condense to a Communication, or expand to an Article
  • You are in late polish, after the science and figures are stable

Article type sets the budget

Advanced Materials counts length in typeset published pages, not manuscript pages — a double-spaced 25-page manuscript may typeset to far fewer pages in the two-column layout. Word count and display items (figures, schemes, tables) count together against the page budget. Approximate targets (verify current limits on the author page):

Article typeTypeset budget (approx.)AbstractDisplay items (approx.)
Communication~4 published pages (~3500 words)none — opening paragraph acts as abstract~4 figures/tables
Research Article~10 published pages (~3000–8000 words)short abstract (~200 words) + 3–7 keywords~3–8 display items
Review / Progresslonger, by invitation/agreementstructured per typemany

A large or multi-panel figure consumes a disproportionate slice of the page budget: adding a panel can cost a paragraph of text.

Choosing Communication vs. Article

  • Communication — one sharp, urgent advance that a specialist audience needs now; concise, high-impact, no room for exhaustive characterization in the body (it goes to the SI).
  • Research Article — the same class of advance but requiring the full structure → property → function story, multiple device configurations, or a mechanism study that a Communication cannot hold.
  • If your "Communication" needs eight figures to be believed, it is an Article. If your "Article" has one figure and one claim, it is a Communication.

Trimming order (cut in this sequence)

Trim only after the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, so you cut padding, not evidence:

  1. Hype and boilerplate — delete "novel/unprecedented/facile/remarkable"; collapse background paragraphs to one sentence (see advmat-writing-style).
  2. Redundant prose — remove sentences that transcribe figure values; interpret instead.
  3. Optimization and secondary data — move process sweeps, extra samples, and control experiments to the SI (see advmat-supplementary).
  4. Display items — merge panels that prove one link; move non-essential figures to the SI; avoid double-column figures unless the data demand it.
  5. Reference pruning — keep the citations that establish novelty and support trust; drop padding.

Never trim: the decisive characterization, the benchmarking, or the headline metric's statistics.

Fit-check routine

  • Typeset a draft in the Wiley template to see real page count, not manuscript pages.
  • Budget each figure by its printed area; tally figures + text together.
  • Leave a margin under the limit so revision additions do not overrun.
  • If still over after trimming padding, the honest fixes are: promote to a Research Article, or move a supporting result wholesale to the SI — not shrinking fonts or figures below legibility.

Checklist

  • Article type chosen deliberately (Communication vs. Research Article) and matches the content
  • Length measured as typeset pages in the Wiley template, not manuscript pages
  • Display items counted together with text against the budget
  • Hype words and background padding removed first
  • Optimization/secondary data moved to the SI, not deleted
  • No double-column figure unless the data require it
  • Abstract/keywords conform to the article type
  • Decisive characterization, benchmarking, and statistics untouched

Anti-patterns

  • Trimming characterization or benchmarking to hit the page limit
  • Counting manuscript pages instead of typeset pages and being surprised at proof
  • Shrinking figures below legibility to save space
  • Forcing a full study into a Communication by hiding the evidence in the SI
  • Padding a thin Communication into an Article with filler characterization
  • Discovering the overrun only at production, after acceptance

Output format

【Article type】Communication / Research Article — matches content?  yes / reconsider
【Typeset page estimate】within budget?  yes / over by ~X
【Display items】counted with text?  N figures + M tables
【Trim done】hype / prose / secondary-data-to-SI / figures / refs
【Untouched】characterization + benchmarking + statistics intact?  yes
【Next】advmat-cover-letter or advmat-submission

Page limits, word counts, abstract/keyword rules, and display-item allowances differ by article type and change — verify all on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고