본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

advmat-supplementary

Use when partitioning content between an Advanced Materials main text and its Supporting Information, ensuring the paper stands alone while extended data, full experimental detail, and secondary characterization live in the SI. Organizes the Supporting Information; does not write the main text.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Advanced Materials Supporting Information (advmat-supplementary)

When to trigger

  • The manuscript is over the Communication/Article format and detail must move out of the body
  • A reader cannot judge the material without opening the SI
  • You have extended datasets, full recipes, or control experiments with no home
  • You are unsure what belongs in the SI versus what must stay in the main text
  • Reviewers of a prior version asked for data that would bloat the body

The stand-alone rule (non-negotiable)

The main text must be fully understandable and convincing on its own. The Supporting Information supports the paper; it must never be load-bearing for the central advance. A reader who never opens the SI should still grasp the material, the decisive evidence that it is what you claim, the property, and the benchmarked function.

  • The central advance, the decisive characterization, and the headline benchmarked metric live in the main text.
  • The SI holds the exhaustive backup a skeptical referee or a group trying to reproduce the work will want.
  • Every SI item is cited from the main text at the point it becomes relevant.

If removing the SI collapses the argument, the partition is wrong — pull the essential piece back into the main text (and trim elsewhere via advmat-length-management).

What belongs in Supporting Information

ContentHome
Full synthesis recipes, optimization sweepsSI
Extended characterization (more samples, techniques)SI
Full device fabrication protocols, control devicesSI
Complete benchmarking table with all referencesSI
Per-sample statistics, histograms, batch dataSI
Additional figures, movies, large data tablesSI
DFT/computational details, input filesSI
The central advance and its decisive evidenceMain text
The property mechanism linking structure to functionMain text
The headline benchmarked metric with n and spreadMain text

SI organization

  • Mirror the main text's logic: order SI sections to match the order they are cited.
  • Give SI sections clear headings and self-contained captions; label SI figures/tables distinctly (Figure S1, Table S1).
  • Include an SI Experimental Section detailed enough to reproduce the material if the main-text version is condensed.
  • Keep the SI honest: it is peer-reviewed alongside the paper — not a place to bury weak or contradictory data.
  • Provide computational and raw-data availability per current Wiley policy (repository + DOI where required).

Checklist

  • The main text is convincing without ever opening the SI
  • No decisive evidence for the advance lives only in the SI
  • Every SI item is cited from the main text at the relevant point
  • SI sections ordered to match their citation order
  • SI figures/tables labeled S1, S2, ... distinctly from main-text items
  • The full reproducible recipe/protocol is in the SI if condensed in the body
  • Nomenclature and units are consistent between main text and SI
  • Data/computational availability handled per current Wiley policy

Anti-patterns

  • A paper that silently depends on the SI to be believed
  • Burying the decisive characterization or the benchmarking in the SI
  • An SI that is a disorganized data dump rather than a structured appendix
  • SI figures referenced out of order or never cited from the body
  • Nomenclature/unit drift between main text and SI
  • Using the SI to smuggle in claims the referees did not scrutinize

Output format

【Main text stands alone】yes / fix (pull back: ...)
【SI sections】S1: ... / S2: ... (cited from body?)
【Decisive evidence only in SI?】none / move back: ...
【SI figure/table labels】S-prefixed?  yes / fix
【Reproducible recipe present】yes / fix
【Nomenclature consistent body↔SI】yes / fix
【Next】advmat-writing-style or advmat-length-management

SI scope, file formats, and data-deposition rules are set by Wiley and evolve — verify on the official Advanced Materials author page.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3천2026년 9월 27일 업데이트

brycewang-stanford의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고