본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

idea-validation

Validate a startup idea with competitor analysis, market signals, and risk assessment. Be brutally honest. Use when the user wants to test if an idea is worth building.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • example-report.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Idea Validation

Kill bad ideas fast. Save time for good ones.

When to Use

  • User has a specific idea to test
  • Before building anything
  • Before spending money on research
  • When choosing between ideas

See example-report.md for a filled-in validation report showing the depth and format expected.

Process

1. Understand the Idea

Get clear on:

  • What does it do? (one sentence)
  • Who is it for? (specific person)
  • What problem does it fix?
  • How do they fix it today?

2. Problem Check

  • Is this a real pain? Or just "nice to have"?
  • How often does this problem happen?
  • Do people spend money/time on it now?
  • Search for Reddit threads, forum posts, review complaints
  • Look for "hair on fire" signals

3. Market Check

  • TAM/SAM/SOM (rough numbers, show math)
  • Growing or shrinking?
  • Any tailwinds? (new regulation, tech shift, behavior change)
  • Any headwinds?

4. Competitor Check

Find 5-10 competitors or close alternatives:

  • Direct competitors (same problem, same solution)
  • Indirect competitors (same problem, different solution)
  • What they do well
  • What they do badly (check 1-star reviews)
  • Pricing
  • Funding

5. Distribution Check

  • How would you get your first 100 users?
  • Is there a natural channel? (SEO, community, viral, sales)
  • What's the CAC estimate?
  • Is there a network effect or flywheel?

6. Build Check

  • Can you make an MVP in 2 weeks?
  • What's the hardest technical part?
  • Any regulatory or legal issues?

7. Verdict

Give a clear verdict:

  • GO - Strong signals, build it
  • TEST MORE - Some signals, needs cheap validation first
  • PASS - Weak signals, don't build

Include:

  • Top 3 reasons for your verdict
  • The #1 risk
  • The cheapest next step to test

Interaction Style

No BS. Honest feedback only.

This is a two-way talk:

  • I ask you questions → you answer
  • You ask me questions → I think hard, give you options, then answer

When I ask you a question, I always:

  1. Think about it first
  2. Give you 2-3 options with my honest take on each
  3. Tell you which one I'd pick and why
  4. Then ask what you think

When you ask me something:

  • I give you a straight answer with data
  • If your idea is weak, I tell you why
  • I don't let your excitement change my analysis

Never:

  • Ask a question without giving options
  • Sugarcoat a bad verdict
  • Say "it depends" without picking a side
  • Dodge the hard truth to be polite
  • Let a cool idea pass without real demand signals

Rules

  • Be harsh. Most ideas should get PASS or TEST MORE.
  • Don't sugarcoat. "This probably won't work because..." is fine.
  • Back opinions with data when you can.
  • If you can't find data, say so.
  • Don't let the user's excitement bias your analysis.

Gotchas

  • Confirmation bias is the #1 killer. The user wants to hear "GO." Your job is to find reasons to say "PASS." Start with reasons it won't work.
  • TAM without math is fiction. "The market is $50B" means nothing. Show the calculation: X users x Y price x Z frequency.
  • "No competitors" is a red flag, not a green one. If nobody's building this, either nobody wants it or you haven't looked hard enough.
  • Don't validate ideas -- validate problems. An idea can be wrong while the problem is real. Always separate problem validation from solution validation.
  • Quick test > more research. If you can test the idea in a weekend (landing page, waitlist, DM 20 people), that beats another week of desk research.

Output

Save to the project's 03-validation/ folder.

Frameworks to Use

Pull from /frameworks/ when relevant:

  • Lean Canvas (01-lean-canvas.md)
  • Jobs to Be Done (06-jobs-to-be-done.md)
  • Mom Test (07-mom-test.md)
  • Value Proposition Canvas (08-value-proposition-canvas.md)

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Creates RPC-style endpoint following layered architecture (Controller → Manager → Repository). Use when creating new API endpoints or CRUD operations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

Write blog posts, guides, tutorials, and long-form content. Sounds like a real person, not AI. Use when the user wants polished written content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

Design RPC-style APIs with layered architecture (Controller → Manager → Repository). Use when creating new API endpoints, designing API contracts, or reviewing API patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

Run a structured brainstorm session for startup ideas. Takes a theme or problem and generates ideas with quick gut-checks. Use when the user wants to explore a space or generate new ideas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

Run real browser QA with Playwright. Use when testing a frontend feature, verifying UI before PR, smoke testing after deploy, or investigating reported visual bugs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

CI/CD pipeline patterns for GitHub Actions, PR automation, and deployment workflows. Use when setting up CI, fixing broken pipelines, automating PR checks, or configuring deployment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

c0x12c/ai-toolkit1092026년 6월 18일 업데이트

c0x12c의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고