본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

analyzing-equity-market-breadth

Evaluates market breadth with advance-decline analysis, new high/low tracking, and sector participation assessment. Use when analyzing market breadth, assessing rally quality, or identifying divergences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Analyzing Equity Market Breadth

When To Use

  • Assessing whether a rally or selloff is broad-based or narrow (e.g., concentrated in mega-cap tech)
  • Identifying breadth divergences that precede trend reversals (index making new highs while fewer stocks participate)
  • Evaluating sector rotation patterns and capital flow shifts across market segments
  • Screening for deteriorating internals beneath a stable headline index level
  • Supporting risk-on / risk-off allocation decisions with participation data

Inputs To Gather

  • Advance-decline data: Daily advancers vs. decliners for the target index or exchange (NYSE, NASDAQ, or composite) [VERIFY exchange-specific data source and reporting cutoff time]
  • Cumulative A/D line: Running sum of net advances to establish trend direction
  • New 52-week highs and lows: Daily counts, ideally broken out by exchange
  • Sector-level performance: Returns and A/D ratios for each GICS sector (or equivalent classification)
  • Volume breadth: Up-volume vs. down-volume ratios to weight participation by capital commitment
  • Index composition details: Number of constituents, weighting scheme (cap-weighted, equal-weighted), top-N concentration
  • Time horizon: Intraday, daily, weekly, or multi-week lookback depending on the analysis purpose

Workflow

  1. Establish baseline context

    • Identify the index or universe under analysis (S&P 500, Russell 2000, NASDAQ Composite, etc.)
    • Note the weighting methodology — cap-weighted indices can mask breadth weakness when a handful of large names drive returns
    • Record the analysis date range and comparison periods
  2. Compute advance-decline metrics

    • Calculate daily net advances (advancers minus decliners) and the cumulative A/D line
    • Compare A/D line trend to the price trend of the headline index — flag divergences where the index rises but the A/D line flattens or declines
    • Compute the A/D ratio (advancers / decliners) and note readings above 2:1 (strong breadth) or below 0.5:1 (weak breadth)
  3. Analyze new high / new low data

    • Track the daily count of new 52-week highs minus new 52-week lows (NH-NL differential)
    • A rising index with a shrinking NH-NL differential signals narrowing leadership
    • Sustained negative NH-NL readings during an index advance are a classic bearish divergence signal
  4. Assess sector participation

    • Determine how many of the 11 GICS sectors are trading above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages
    • Identify which sectors are leading vs. lagging — defensive sector leadership (utilities, staples, healthcare) during a rally often signals fragile breadth
    • Flag any single sector contributing a disproportionate share of index returns
  5. Evaluate volume breadth

    • Compare up-volume to down-volume; readings above 90% up-volume ("breadth thrust") are historically bullish confirmation signals [VERIFY specific threshold definitions per the indicator variant used]
    • Persistent low up-volume ratios during price advances suggest lack of conviction
  6. Synthesize and classify breadth regime

    • Classify the current environment: broad participation, narrowing breadth, divergence, or breadth thrust
    • Identify the most actionable signal (e.g., "A/D line divergence persisting for 3+ weeks while index is within 1% of highs")
    • Note any historical analogs if relevant

Output

  • Breadth Summary Table: Date range, index, A/D ratio, cumulative A/D line trend, NH-NL differential, sectors above 50-DMA / 200-DMA, up-volume ratio
  • Divergence Flags: Explicit callouts where breadth metrics conflict with headline index direction, with severity rating (early, developing, confirmed)
  • Sector Participation Map: Heatmap or ranked list showing sector-level breadth contribution
  • Signal Classification: Current breadth regime label with supporting evidence
  • Actionable Implications: What the breadth picture suggests for position sizing, hedging, or sector rotation — framed for trading and execution desks

Quality Checks

  • Confirm data covers the full trading session (not partial or pre-market only) [VERIFY data source timestamp conventions]
  • Cross-check A/D data against at least one independent source to catch reporting errors
  • Ensure new high/low counts use a consistent lookback window (52-week standard; some sources use shorter periods)
  • Verify that sector breakdowns use the same index universe — mixing S&P 500 sector data with Russell 2000 index-level data produces misleading conclusions
  • Flag any days with unusual market structure events (half-days, index rebalances, options expiration) that distort breadth readings
  • Do not present breadth signals as predictive with certainty — note historical base rates and false-positive frequency where available

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

CaseMark의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고