본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

conducting-infrastructure-due-diligence

Structures infrastructure DD with technical assessment, regulatory review, environmental analysis, and community impact evaluation. Use when conducting infra DD, evaluating asset condition, or assessing regulatory risk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Conducting Infrastructure Due Diligence

When To Use

  • Evaluating an infrastructure asset (toll road, airport, port, power plant, water/wastewater system, broadband network) for acquisition, concession bid, or refinancing
  • Assessing condition and remaining useful life of physical assets before capital commitment
  • Reviewing regulatory and permitting frameworks for greenfield or brownfield projects
  • Conducting pre-close DD for PPP/P3 transactions or infrastructure fund investments
  • Evaluating environmental liabilities, community impact, or social license risks tied to an asset

Inputs To Gather

  • Asset description: asset type, location, age, original construction specs, and current operator
  • Financial model / base case: projected revenues, O&M budgets, capex reserves, and debt service coverage
  • Concession or contract documents: concession agreement, offtake/PPA, EPC/O&M contracts, government support agreements
  • Technical reports: independent engineer (IE) reports, condition assessments, traffic/demand studies
  • Regulatory filings: permits, licenses, tariff orders, rate-case history, environmental compliance records
  • Insurance program: current policies, loss history, and pending claims
  • Environmental / social data: Phase I/II ESA reports, EIS/EIA, community engagement records, land acquisition status
  • Title and real property: ownership chain, easements, rights-of-way, encroachments

Workflow

1. Scope & Organize the DD Workstreams

Define workstreams aligned to key risk categories:

  • Technical / Engineering: physical condition, design adequacy, deferred maintenance backlog, remaining useful life, seismic/climate resilience
  • Regulatory & Permitting: current permits and expiration dates, pending proceedings, tariff/rate-setting mechanism, political/sovereign risk [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific regulatory bodies and approval timelines]
  • Environmental & Social: contamination history, remediation obligations, emissions compliance, community opposition, resettlement or land acquisition disputes
  • Legal & Contractual: concession terms (duration, handback conditions, termination triggers), EPC/O&M contractor performance, step-in rights, lender consent requirements
  • Financial & Commercial: demand/traffic risk, revenue model sensitivity, counterparty creditworthiness, capex waterfall adequacy

Assign each workstream an owner, timeline, and materiality threshold for flagging findings.

2. Technical Asset Assessment

  • Review IE report for asset condition ratings; cross-check against O&M logs and capital expenditure history
  • Identify deferred maintenance items and estimate cost-to-cure vs. remaining concession or hold period
  • Assess lifecycle capex needs — compare sponsor's base case assumptions against IE recommendations
  • Evaluate technology obsolescence risk (e.g., toll collection systems, generation equipment, signaling)
  • Check climate/natural hazard exposure: flood zones, seismic classification, wildfire risk, sea-level rise projections [VERIFY local climate adaptation requirements]

3. Regulatory & Permitting Review

  • Map all required permits and licenses; confirm current status and renewal timelines
  • Identify pending or anticipated regulatory proceedings that could affect tariffs, rates, or operating authority
  • For PPP assets: review government payment mechanisms, availability payment formulas, and termination compensation clauses [VERIFY sovereign immunity and dispute resolution forum]
  • Assess political risk — changes in government policy, re-nationalization precedent, local content requirements
  • Confirm compliance with sector-specific regulations (e.g., FERC for US energy, OSHA for construction safety, FAA for airports) [VERIFY applicable regulatory regime by jurisdiction]

4. Environmental & Community Impact

  • Review Phase I/II ESA findings; quantify known or potential remediation liabilities
  • Check emissions permits, discharge limits, and compliance history against current regulations
  • Evaluate community and stakeholder sentiment — review public comment records, media coverage, pending litigation
  • For greenfield: confirm EIA/EIS approval status, land acquisition completion percentage, and resettlement plan adequacy
  • Assess ESG alignment with investor mandates (GRESB score, TCFD disclosure readiness, IFC Performance Standards)

5. Contractual & Counterparty Analysis

  • Abstract key terms from concession agreement: duration, handback conditions, performance benchmarks, force majeure, change-in-law protections
  • Review EPC contract — liquidated damages adequacy, warranty periods, defects liability
  • Evaluate O&M contract scope, KPIs, penalty/bonus mechanisms, and termination-for-convenience provisions
  • Assess counterparty credit: offtaker/government creditworthiness, guarantor standing, political risk insurance coverage
  • Confirm lender consent and intercreditor requirements for any change of control or refinancing

6. Synthesize Findings & Risk Matrix

  • Compile workstream findings into a consolidated risk register with severity (high/medium/low) and likelihood ratings
  • Quantify material risks in financial terms — impact on IRR, DSCR, and equity value
  • Identify deal-breakers vs. mitigable risks vs. acceptable risks with pricing adjustments
  • Prepare a DD summary memo suitable for investment committee presentation

Output

Produce a structured DD report containing:

  • Executive summary with go/no-go recommendation and key risk flags
  • Workstream reports (technical, regulatory, environmental, legal, financial) with detailed findings
  • Risk matrix mapping each identified risk to severity, likelihood, mitigation strategy, and responsible party
  • Condition precedent / closing checklist items flowing from DD findings (e.g., required consents, remediation escrows, insurance endorsements)
  • Appendix of source documents reviewed, site visit notes, and expert interview summaries

Quality Checks

  • Every material finding is traced to a source document or expert opinion — no unsupported conclusions
  • Financial impacts are quantified where possible; qualitative risks include a clear rationale for severity rating
  • All jurisdiction-dependent points (permit regimes, regulatory bodies, environmental standards) are marked [VERIFY]
  • Concession/contract abstracts have been cross-checked against the actual executed documents, not summaries
  • Handback and termination provisions are stress-tested against downside scenarios
  • Report distinguishes between confirmed findings and areas requiring further investigation
  • ESG/community risk section reflects current investor standards and is not treated as a checkbox exercise

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 22일 업데이트

CaseMark의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고