본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

modeling-credit-fund-portfolios

Builds credit fund portfolio models with yield attribution, default/recovery scenarios, and portfolio-level return analysis. Use when modeling credit funds, projecting portfolio returns, or analyzing yield components.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Modeling Credit Fund Portfolios

Builds credit fund portfolio models with yield attribution, default/recovery scenarios, and portfolio-level return analysis for direct lending, broadly syndicated loan, and private credit strategies.

When To Use

  • Projecting net returns for a credit fund across base, stress, and downside scenarios
  • Decomposing portfolio yield into coupon, OID, fee income, and PIK components
  • Modeling default waterfalls with recovery timing and severity assumptions
  • Evaluating the impact of leverage (subscription lines, asset-level facilities) on equity returns
  • Preparing LP reporting models or IC memoranda that require portfolio-level return attribution

Inputs To Gather

  • Portfolio composition: loan tape or representative pool (borrower, commitment size, drawn %, spread, floor, OID, maturity, asset type)
  • Fund terms: management fee rate, incentive fee / carried interest structure, hurdle rate, preferred return, catch-up, GP commitment %
  • Leverage assumptions: advance rate, cost of borrowing on credit facility, commitment fee on undrawn, covenant headroom
  • Credit assumptions: annual default rate, loss given default (LGD) or recovery rate, recovery lag (months), prepayment rate (CPR or voluntary)
  • Deployment schedule: ramp period, reinvestment period end, harvest / wind-down timeline
  • Fee income: upfront origination fees, amendment/waiver fees, prepayment penalties, LIBOR/SOFR floor benefit [VERIFY: confirm current reference rate and transition status]

Workflow

  1. Build the loan tape model

    • Populate each position with par amount, spread (S + margin), SOFR floor, OID amortization schedule, maturity, and PIK toggle if applicable
    • Calculate weighted-average spread, weighted-average life (WAL), and cash vs. PIK yield split
    • Flag any floating-rate mismatches between assets and liabilities
  2. Construct yield attribution

    • Separate gross portfolio yield into: (a) cash coupon, (b) OID accretion, (c) origination/amendment fee amortization, (d) PIK accrual, (e) SOFR floor benefit
    • Sum to gross asset yield; subtract cost of fund-level leverage to arrive at net asset yield
    • Layer in management fees and fund expenses to compute net investment income (NII)
  3. Model default and recovery scenarios

    • Define scenarios — e.g., base (1–2% annual default, 60–70% recovery), stress (4–5% default, 40–50% recovery), severe (8%+ default, 25–35% recovery) [VERIFY: adjust ranges to match fund vintage and asset class norms]
    • Apply defaults as random or front-loaded timing vectors across the portfolio life
    • Model recovery cash flows with a lag (typically 12–24 months post-default) and haircut to par
    • Calculate net credit losses per period and cumulative loss rate
  4. Layer leverage and compute equity returns

    • Model subscription-line draws during ramp, converting to term asset-level leverage post-ramp
    • Calculate interest expense on drawn leverage, undrawn commitment fees, and facility amortization
    • Compute levered vs. unlevered returns: gross ROA → levered gross return → net-of-fee return to LPs
    • Derive gross and net IRR, MOIC, and DPI across the fund life for each scenario
  5. Build the waterfall and carried interest schedule

    • Map cash flows through the distribution waterfall: return of capital → preferred return → GP catch-up → carried interest split
    • Compute GP economics (management fees + carry) and LP net returns separately
    • Sensitivity-test the waterfall on deployment pace, default timing, and prepayment speed
  6. Run sensitivity and scenario tables

    • Two-way tables: default rate vs. recovery rate → net IRR to LPs
    • Two-way tables: spread compression vs. prepayment speed → gross yield
    • Toggle leverage on/off to isolate leverage contribution to returns
    • Stress-test SOFR path scenarios (parallel shift, inversion) on floating-rate NIM

Output

  • Portfolio summary: position count, total commitments, drawn balance, WAL, WA spread, WA OID, cash/PIK mix
  • Yield attribution table: line-item decomposition from gross asset yield to LP net return
  • Scenario matrix: base / stress / severe cases showing gross IRR, net IRR, MOIC, DPI, cumulative loss rate
  • Leverage impact summary: unlevered vs. levered returns with advance rate and borrowing cost shown
  • Waterfall schedule: period-by-period cash flows to LP and GP, with carry crystallization timing
  • Sensitivity tables: two-way grids on key drivers (default/recovery, spread/prepay, SOFR path)

Quality Checks

  • Confirm WAL and WA spread match the loan tape; reconcile any differences from PIK or OID treatment
  • Verify that gross-to-net bridge is fully traceable (no unexplained leakage between gross yield and LP net return)
  • Ensure default timing vectors sum to the stated cumulative default rate over fund life
  • Check that recovery cash flows are lagged correctly and do not exceed par
  • Validate waterfall math: LP preferred return accrues correctly; catch-up and carry split match fund LPA terms [VERIFY: confirm specific waterfall mechanics against the fund's LPA]
  • Cross-check levered return math — leverage should amplify both upside and downside symmetrically relative to the advance rate and spread-over-borrow differential
  • Confirm SOFR floor benefit is calculated only when reference rate falls below the contractual floor
  • Test edge cases: 100% prepayment in year 1, zero defaults, and full portfolio wipeout to ensure model stability

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CaseMark/skills462026년 10월 23일 업데이트

CaseMark의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고