Handles customer situations that have exceeded normal support — severity assessment, incident communication, executive escalation, and recovering a relationship after a failure. Use this when a customer issue is escalating or has gone to leadership, during a customer-affecting outage, when a major account is at risk, when a relationship needs repairing after a failure, or to design the escalation path itself.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
An escalation is a signal that the normal path failed. Handling it well matters; the more useful question afterward is why it was needed.
Severity is what it costs them, not how alarming it looks internally. A cosmetic bug blocking a regulated filing is severe. A total outage of a feature nobody uses is not.
Ask: what can they not do, how many people, is there a workaround, and is there a deadline attached. That last one converts a medium into a critical more often than anything technical.
Own it visibly. One named person, introduced to the customer, who does not disappear. Escalations get worse when ownership is ambiguous — the customer starts re-explaining, which is its own insult.
Communicate on a stated cadence, and hold it even when there is nothing new. "No update yet, next update at three" preserves trust; silence destroys it faster than bad news does. Customers escalate again because they heard nothing, far more often than because of the underlying issue.
Separate acknowledgment from explanation. Acknowledge the impact immediately, in their terms. Explanation comes when you actually know. Leading with a cause you have not confirmed means retracting it later, and the retraction is what they remember.
Do not over-promise to end the conversation. Every commitment made under pressure to a frustrated customer is a commitment someone has to keep, and failing a recovery promise ends the relationship.
When a customer reaches your leadership, the relationship is already damaged — the escalation is the symptom.
Brief the executive properly before the call: what happened, what we have done, what we are committing to, and what not to promise. An executive walking in uninformed makes commitments the delivering team learns about afterward.
Recovery is not an apology. It is: acknowledge specifically what failed, say what changed so it cannot recur, and demonstrate it over time. Credits and discounts are compensation, not recovery — they close the ledger without addressing the trust.
The strongest recovery move is showing them the fix shipped.
Every escalation gets a short review: what made the normal path fail, was severity assessed correctly, did we communicate on time, and what would have prevented it.
Escalation volume is a health metric for the whole function. Rising escalations mean the normal path is failing more often, and that is the thing to fix.
references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.