본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

voice-of-customer

Turn customer comments from support, surveys, interviews, and reviews into tracked themes, clear ownership, and product or service changes. Use it to interpret CSAT or NPS trends, prioritize recurring problems, and report back to customers and internal teams.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Builds the loop from what customers say to what gets changed — collecting feedback, distinguishing signal from noise, routing it to owners, and closing the loop back to the customer. Use this to set up a feedback program, design or interpret CSAT/NPS, decide what customer feedback deserves action, get product to act on recurring issues, or diagnose why feedback is collected but nothing changes.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Build a customer feedback program
  • Interpret CSAT or NPS with context
  • Prioritize recurring customer problems
  • Close the loop with customers and support

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Voice of customer

Most feedback programs collect diligently and change nothing. The collection is the easy half; the loop is the whole value.

Sources, weighted honestly

  • Support contacts — the highest-volume and least prompted source, and the most under-used. People contacting you have a real problem nobody asked them about. But the sample is strongly self-selected: it excludes everyone who silently churned, worked around the problem, or would never contact you. Treat it as operational evidence to be normalized per active account and triangulated against churn and behavioral data — never as representative of the customer base.
  • Churn and loss reasons — the most valuable and most under-sampled. People leaving have no reason to be polite.
  • Interviews — depth, small n, best for understanding why something in the data is happening.
  • Surveys — breadth, and only meaningful once you know what to ask.
  • Public reviews and forums — biased toward extremes, useful for what people say when you are not in the room.

Anything a customer built a workaround for outranks anything they merely said in a survey.

On CSAT and NPS

Both are useful as trends and misleading as targets. The moment a team is measured on a score, the score improves faster than the experience does — asking at the favorable moment, coaching for the rating, excluding difficult segments.

Treat the score as a prompt for the free-text answer, which is where the information is. Segment before concluding: an overall score is an average of experiences that have nothing in common.

Never target a number without also watching the behavior it is supposed to predict.

Turning feedback into change

The failure is not collection, it is triage. Feedback needs:

  • Categorization against a stable taxonomy, so volume per cause is countable across periods.
  • Quantification. "Several customers mentioned" loses every argument. "Eighty-one contacts this quarter, four percent of active accounts, twelve of them on enterprise plans" wins.
  • A named owner per theme, outside the feedback function. A theme owned by the team collecting it goes nowhere.
  • A standing review where product, support, and success look at the same list together.

Distinguish requests from problems. Customers describe solutions; your job is to recover the problem underneath, because the request is often not the best fix for it.

Closing the loop

Tell the customer what changed and that they prompted it. Almost nobody does this, which is exactly why it works — it converts a complainer into someone who reports the next issue instead of leaving.

Also close it internally: show the support team what shipped because of what they escalated, or they stop escalating.

Tooling

Survey and feedback: Qualtrics, Medallia, Delighted, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, and similar.

In-product feedback and micro-surveys: Pendo, Sprig, Chameleon, and similar — usually a better signal than emailed surveys because they reach people mid-task rather than after the fact.

Aggregating unstructured feedback across tickets, calls and reviews is where the platforms differ most. Whatever collects it, the theme has to be traceable back to individual verbatims, or nobody downstream will believe the count.

Never

  • Report themes without volume.
  • Let one loud enterprise account set the roadmap without checking how widely the problem is shared.
  • Run a program with no mechanism for anything to change as a result. That is a survey habit, not a feedback loop.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design a repository’s multi-agent structure by assigning exclusive file areas, defining builder and reviewer roles, and checking ownership rules with a CI script. Use it to divide work, prevent overlapping edits, and decide whether another agent is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Dividing repository work among agents
  • Defining agent roles and file ownership
  • Auditing overlapping agent responsibilities
cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Use this skill to define an AI system’s intended use, evaluate its errors across user groups, plan monitoring and meaningful human review, and document its limits. It supports deployment and retirement decisions, especially when AI could affect consequential outcomes for people.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set evaluation criteria before deployment
  • Investigate model behavior drift
  • Plan monitoring and human review
cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Use this skill to analyze markets, map competitors, assess trends, and compare strategic options such as market entry or build versus buy. It produces a cited research brief that separates established facts from inferences and estimates, states confidence, and connects findings to a decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Sizing a market or analyzing an industry
  • Mapping competitors and buyer differences
  • Comparing market entry or build versus buy
cbrock84/headcount2.1천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

cbrock84의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고