본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

analyzing-great-expectations

Use when working with Great Expectations — great Expectations data quality framework analysis. Covers expectation suite management, validation result review, data docs generation, checkpoint execution, datasource configuration, and batch analysis. Use when reviewing data quality results, managing expectation suites, investigating validation failures, or auditing data quality configurations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Great Expectations Analysis Skill

Analyze and manage Great Expectations data quality suites, validations, and checkpoints.

MANDATORY: Discovery-First Pattern

Always discover project structure and available suites before querying specific validation results.

Phase 1: Discovery

#!/bin/bash

GE_DIR="${GE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}"

echo "=== Great Expectations Project Structure ==="
ls -la "${GE_DIR}/great_expectations/" 2>/dev/null || echo "No GE directory found at ${GE_DIR}"

echo ""
echo "=== Expectation Suites ==="
ls "${GE_DIR}/great_expectations/expectations/" 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo ""
echo "=== Checkpoints ==="
ls "${GE_DIR}/great_expectations/checkpoints/" 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo ""
echo "=== Datasources (from config) ==="
python3 -c "
import yaml
with open('${GE_DIR}/great_expectations/great_expectations.yml') as f:
    config = yaml.safe_load(f)
for name, ds in config.get('datasources', {}).items():
    print(f'{name}\t{ds.get(\"class_name\", \"?\")}\t{ds.get(\"execution_engine\", {}).get(\"class_name\", \"?\")}')
" 2>/dev/null | column -t

echo ""
echo "=== Validation Results (recent) ==="
ls -lt "${GE_DIR}/great_expectations/uncommitted/validations/" 2>/dev/null | head -10

Core Helper Functions

#!/bin/bash

GE_DIR="${GE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}"
GE_BASE="${GE_DIR}/great_expectations"

# Run GE CLI command
ge_cmd() {
    cd "${GE_DIR}" && great_expectations "$@" 2>/dev/null
}

# Parse validation result JSON
ge_parse_validation() {
    local result_file="$1"
    jq '{
        suite: .meta.expectation_suite_name,
        success: .success,
        evaluated: (.results | length),
        passed: ([.results[] | select(.success == true)] | length),
        failed: ([.results[] | select(.success == false)] | length),
        run_time: .meta.run_id.run_time
    }' "$result_file"
}

# List all expectation suites
ge_list_suites() {
    find "${GE_BASE}/expectations" -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | \
        sed "s|${GE_BASE}/expectations/||;s|\.json$||;s|/|.|g"
}

Output Rules

  • TOKEN EFFICIENCY: Target ≤50 lines per output
  • Parse JSON validation results with jq — never dump full expectation configs
  • Summarize pass/fail counts, not individual expectation details

Common Operations

Expectation Suite Analysis

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== All Expectation Suites ==="
ge_list_suites | while read suite; do
    SUITE_FILE="${GE_BASE}/expectations/$(echo $suite | tr '.' '/').json"
    COUNT=$(jq '.expectations | length' "$SUITE_FILE" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
    echo -e "${suite}\t${COUNT} expectations"
done | column -t

echo ""
echo "=== Suite Detail ==="
SUITE="${1:-}"
if [ -n "$SUITE" ]; then
    SUITE_FILE="${GE_BASE}/expectations/$(echo $SUITE | tr '.' '/').json"
    jq -r '.expectations[] | "\(.expectation_type)\t\(.kwargs | to_entries | map("\(.key)=\(.value)") | join(", ") | .[0:60])"' \
        "$SUITE_FILE" | column -t | head -20
fi

Validation Results Review

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Recent Validation Results ==="
find "${GE_BASE}/uncommitted/validations" -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | \
    sort -r | head -10 | while read vfile; do
    jq -r '"Suite: \(.meta.expectation_suite_name)\tSuccess: \(.success)\tPassed: \([.results[] | select(.success)] | length)/\(.results | length)\tTime: \(.meta.run_id.run_time[0:16] // "?")"' "$vfile" 2>/dev/null
done | column -t

echo ""
echo "=== Failed Validations ==="
find "${GE_BASE}/uncommitted/validations" -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | \
    sort -r | head -20 | while read vfile; do
    FAILED=$(jq 'select(.success == false) | .meta.expectation_suite_name' "$vfile" 2>/dev/null)
    if [ -n "$FAILED" ]; then
        jq -r '"\(.meta.expectation_suite_name)\t\(.meta.run_id.run_time[0:16] // "?")\t\([.results[] | select(.success == false)] | length) failed"' "$vfile"
    fi
done | column -t

Failed Expectation Details

#!/bin/bash
VALIDATION_FILE="${1:?Validation result file path required}"

echo "=== Validation Summary ==="
ge_parse_validation "$VALIDATION_FILE"

echo ""
echo "=== Failed Expectations ==="
jq -r '
    .results[] | select(.success == false) |
    "\(.expectation_config.expectation_type)\t\(.expectation_config.kwargs.column // "table-level")\tObserved: \(.result.observed_value // "N/A")"
' "$VALIDATION_FILE" | column -t | head -20

echo ""
echo "=== Unexpected Values (sample) ==="
jq -r '
    .results[] | select(.success == false) |
    select(.result.partial_unexpected_list != null) |
    "\(.expectation_config.kwargs.column): \(.result.partial_unexpected_list[:5] | join(", "))"
' "$VALIDATION_FILE" | head -10

Checkpoint Execution

#!/bin/bash
CHECKPOINT="${1:?Checkpoint name required}"
DRY_RUN="${2:-true}"

if [ "$DRY_RUN" = "true" ]; then
    echo "=== Checkpoint Config: $CHECKPOINT ==="
    CKPT_FILE="${GE_BASE}/checkpoints/${CHECKPOINT}.yml"
    python3 -c "
import yaml
with open('${CKPT_FILE}') as f:
    config = yaml.safe_load(f)
print(f'Class: {config.get(\"class_name\", \"?\")}')
for vc in config.get('validations', []):
    print(f'  Suite: {vc.get(\"expectation_suite_name\", \"?\")}\tBatch: {vc.get(\"batch_request\", {}).get(\"datasource_name\", \"?\")}')
" 2>/dev/null
    echo ""
    echo "To execute, call with dry_run=false"
else
    echo "=== Running Checkpoint: $CHECKPOINT ==="
    cd "${GE_DIR}" && great_expectations checkpoint run "$CHECKPOINT" 2>&1 | tail -20
fi

Data Docs and Documentation

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Data Docs Sites ==="
python3 -c "
import yaml
with open('${GE_BASE}/great_expectations.yml') as f:
    config = yaml.safe_load(f)
for name, site in config.get('data_docs_sites', {}).items():
    store = site.get('store_backend', {})
    print(f'{name}\t{store.get(\"class_name\", \"?\")}\t{store.get(\"base_directory\", store.get(\"bucket\", \"?\"))}')
" 2>/dev/null | column -t

echo ""
echo "=== Build Data Docs ==="
echo "Run: great_expectations docs build --no-view"

echo ""
echo "=== Expectation Coverage ==="
ge_list_suites | while read suite; do
    SUITE_FILE="${GE_BASE}/expectations/$(echo $suite | tr '.' '/').json"
    TYPES=$(jq -r '[.expectations[].expectation_type] | unique | join(", ")' "$SUITE_FILE" 2>/dev/null)
    echo -e "${suite}\t${TYPES}"
done | column -t | head -15

Output Format

Present results as a structured report:

Analyzing Great Expectations Report
═══════════════════════════════════
Resources discovered: [count]

Resource       Status    Key Metric    Issues
──────────────────────────────────────────────
[name]         [ok/warn] [value]       [findings]

Summary: [total] resources | [ok] healthy | [warn] warnings | [crit] critical
Action Items: [list of prioritized findings]

Target ≤50 lines of output. Use tables for multi-resource comparisons.

Anti-Hallucination Rules

  1. NEVER assume resource names — always discover via CLI/API in Phase 1 before referencing in Phase 2.
  2. NEVER fabricate metric names or dimensions — verify against the service documentation or --help output.
  3. NEVER mix CLI commands between service versions — confirm which version/API you are targeting.
  4. ALWAYS use the discovery → verify → analyze chain — every resource referenced must have been discovered first.
  5. ALWAYS handle empty results gracefully — an empty response is valid data, not an error to retry.

Counter-Rationalizations

ShortcutCounterWhy
"I'll skip discovery and check known resources"Always run Phase 1 discovery firstResource names change, new resources appear — assumed names cause errors
"The user only asked for a quick check"Follow the full discovery → analysis flowQuick checks miss critical issues; structured analysis catches silent failures
"Default configuration is probably fine"Audit configuration explicitlyDefaults often leave logging, security, and optimization features disabled
"Metrics aren't needed for this"Always check relevant metrics when availableAPI/CLI responses show current state; metrics reveal trends and intermittent issues
"I don't have access to that"Try the command and report the actual errorAssumed permission failures prevent useful investigation; actual errors are informative

Common Pitfalls

  • Project root: GE expects to be run from the project root containing great_expectations/ directory
  • Suite naming: Suite names use dots as separators that map to directory structure — my_suite.orders maps to expectations/my_suite/orders.json
  • Validation storage: Results in uncommitted/validations/ are gitignored by default — use a configured validations store for persistence
  • Config versions: GE has had major config format changes (v2 vs v3) — check config_version in great_expectations.yml
  • Batch request: V3 API uses batch requests with datasource/data_connector/data_asset — all three must match
  • Runtime vs stored: Expectations can be created at runtime (not persisted) — only suites saved to disk appear in file listing
  • Checkpoint vs suite: Checkpoints orchestrate validation runs against specific data batches — suites define the rules only
  • Data docs staleness: Data docs are static HTML and must be rebuilt after new validations — they don't auto-update
  • Cloud vs OSS: Great Expectations Cloud has its own API — OSS relies on file-based configuration and CLI

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Cloudflare GraphQL Analytics for zone traffic, firewall events, Workers metrics, and schema exploration. Use when querying Cloudflare analytics data or exploring the GraphQL API.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

Use when working with Alloydb — google AlloyDB instance analysis, query insights, columnar engine optimization, maintenance windows, and cluster health.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

Use when working with Aqua — aqua Security platform analysis. Covers container runtime protection, image assurance policies, compliance frameworks, vulnerability management, workload protection, and registry scanning. Use when analyzing container security posture, reviewing image compliance, investigating runtime alerts, or auditing security policies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

Use when working with Bigquery — google BigQuery job analysis, slot utilization, cost analysis, dataset management, and query optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

Use when working with Cassandra — apache Cassandra keyspace analysis, compaction strategies, repair status, nodetool operations, and cluster health monitoring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

Use when working with Checkov — checkov infrastructure-as-code security scanning. Covers Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Dockerfile scanning, policy management, custom checks, compliance frameworks, and suppression management. Use when scanning IaC for security misconfigurations, evaluating compliance, managing custom policies, or reviewing scan results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026년 4월 5일 업데이트

cloudthinker-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고