Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when creating decision-complete plans through grounding, capped clarification, subagent delegation, and critic iteration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Use this workflow package for non-trivial planning work where the agent must produce a structured plan before implementation, handoff, or approval.
Ground first: inspect available repo files, docs, config, schemas, current GitHub state, or local system facts before asking the user. Do not ask questions that non-mutating inspection can answer.
Clarify only when it materially changes the plan. Ask at most three user questions total, one at a time, using the reverse decision-tree style from ls/docs/DECISION_TREE_WORKFLOW.md: A-D options, preferred choice, and rationale. Use available question/input/TUI tooling when supported; otherwise render clear markdown or plain-text choices. This three-question cap is local to this planning workflow and does not change the default ls-wf-spec-clarify-reverse protocol.
For non-trivial plans, use subagents when they reduce risk or context load: explorer for broad repo discovery, researcher for current external facts, tester for validation plans or long command logs, and reviewer as an independent critic when that materially improves evidence and is available and authorized. Keep the controller responsible for verification, checkpoints, and final plan quality. Do not force delegation for trivial direct tasks or when direct execution is the only useful route.
Review plans for requirement coverage, resolved decisions, grounding evidence, verification, safety, and scope. Use an independent critic when it materially improves evidence and is available and authorized. Repeat review after material corrections or when material findings remain; do not impose a minimum number of rounds or a numeric satisfaction quota. Turn unresolved prerequisites into explicit blockers, and keep the controller responsible for decision completeness. Submit the resulting plan through the active client's plan-submission mechanism; do not require literal <proposed_plan> output.
Primary references: ls/docs/DECISION_TREE_WORKFLOW.md, ls/docs/WORKFLOW_STANDARD.md, ls/docs/WORKFLOW_PACKAGES.md, and ls/docs/SKILLS_AND_RULES.md.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when choosing a LocalSetup Agent-* lane for exploration, research, bounded implementation, or review. Consult the static capability matrix; do not probe account or network availability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide agent email inbox workflows with prompt-injection defenses. Use for inbound email processing, webhooks, routing, and safety review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Navigate and understand codebases using agentlens hierarchical documentation. Use when exploring new projects, finding modules, locating symbols in large files, finding TODOs/warnings, or understanding code structure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for Agent Q signed encrypted file-drop or mail ship and ingest, private registry v2 setup, queue status, and transport maintenance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inventory wrapper for the alirezarezvani Claude skills bundle. Use when triaging its broad skill catalog and large script surface before any targeted import.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.