본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

agent-visual-evidence-manifest

Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구Playwright
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(11)

  • SKILL.md12.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml1.0 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md210 B
  • examples/expected-output.md7.2 KB
  • examples/sample-input.json3.0 KB
  • README.md1.3 KB
  • references/control-panel-state-coverage.md3.5 KB
  • references/manifest-field-semantics.md4.4 KB
  • schemas/proof-manifest-spec.schema.json3.6 KB
  • scripts/proof_manifest_audit.mjs10.1 KB
  • templates/output-template.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Agent Visual Evidence Manifest

Prove a PR's screenshots, GIFs, and recordings are bound to a real, branch-current, daemon-backed run — not a reused mock wearing a "LIVE" label.

Use This For

  • Gating a PR's visual-evidence artifacts before merge: does every screenshot/GIF/recording carry a complete provenance manifest?
  • Catching a stale or reused artifact whose manifest commit no longer matches the PR's branch HEAD.
  • Catching an artifact whose manifest never says whether its data is real, fixture, or mock.
  • Verifying an operator-control-panel PR's proof set actually covers the required state inventory, not just the happy path.
  • Deciding whether a fixture/mock-labeled artifact is acceptable (it is, if honestly declared) versus an undeclared one (it never is).

Do Not Use This For

  • How to capture a screenshot without interrupting the operator's desktop — headless Playwright, screencapture -x -l, capture harnesses (port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine).
  • Designing the shape of the Work Receipt an artifact ultimately attaches to (agent-work-receipt-designer).
  • The broad product-level question of whether a multi-agent authoring surface clears a dogfood/Potemkin bar (multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).

The Proof-Manifest Gate

flowchart TD
  A[PR carries visual artifacts] --> B{Any artifacts attached?}
  B -->|No| Z[FAIL: no-artifacts]
  B -->|Yes| C[Check each manifest's six fields]
  C --> D{All fields present?}
  D -->|No| E[FAIL: manifest-missing-provenance-field]
  D -->|Yes| F{sourceLabel declared?}
  F -->|No| G[FAIL: undeclared-source-label]
  F -->|Yes, real/fixture/mock| H{manifest.commit == branch HEAD?}
  H -->|No| I[FAIL: commit-mismatch]
  H -->|Yes| J{isControlPanelPr?}
  J -->|Yes| K{All 7 states covered?}
  K -->|No| L[FAIL: control-panel-state-coverage-incomplete]
  K -->|Yes| M[PASS]
  J -->|No| M
  1. Collect every artifact's manifest. For each screenshot, GIF, or recording attached to the PR, gather daemonPort, runId, transcriptHeadHash, agentNodeId, commit, and sourceLabel. An empty artifact set is never safe — it fails closed, not open.
  2. Check field completeness per artifact. Any of the six fields missing, null, or empty-string means the artifact cannot yet count as proof; see references/manifest-field-semantics.md for what each field proves and why partial credit isn't a thing.
  3. Check the source label specifically. real, fixture, and mock are all acceptable answers — an absent one is not. This gets its own check because it is the single field that separates honest illustration from disguised fakery.
  4. Check every manifest's commit against the PR's branch HEAD. A manifest bound to an earlier commit is stale proof, even if every other field is filled in — the surface it depicts may no longer exist.
  5. If the PR touches the operator control-panel surface, check state coverage. Union every artifact's demonstrated state against the required set (active, historical, blocked, stale, gate, interrupt, receipt); see references/control-panel-state-coverage.md for what each state must show and why partial coverage hides the bugs that matter most.
  6. Score and gate. Any critical finding blocks pass regardless of score; score below 75 also blocks even with zero criticals (defense in depth for medium/high accumulation).
  7. Route capture-technique and receipt-schema questions elsewhere. This gate only judges the manifest's structure and consistency — it does not (and cannot, on its own) prove a real-labeled artifact wasn't staged; that needs the adversarial canary described in sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness.

Output Contract

A passing proof-manifest audit reads a spec with:

  • branchCommit: the PR branch's current HEAD commit, checked against every artifact.
  • isControlPanelPr: whether full state coverage applies.
  • statesCovered: the union of states this PR's artifacts demonstrate.
  • artifacts[]: each { file, manifest: { daemonPort, runId, transcriptHeadHash, agentNodeId, commit, sourceLabel } }.

Use scripts/proof_manifest_audit.mjs to audit a proof-manifest-spec JSON and return { pass, score, findings, recommendations }.

Anti-Patterns

Zero Or Incomplete Provenance

Novice: Open the PR with "see attached" screenshots and no manifest at all, or a manifest that only bothers to name the file path. Expert: Every artifact carries all six provenance fields before the PR is marked ready — an empty artifact set or a half-filled manifest is treated as a hole in the proof, not a formality to backfill later. Detection: proof_manifest_audit.mjs fires no-artifacts (critical) when the artifact list is empty, and manifest-missing-provenance-field (critical) per artifact missing any of daemonPort/runId/transcriptHeadHash/agentNodeId/commit/sourceLabel.

The Undeclared Mock

Novice: Ship a polished screenshot of a stubbed UI state without saying so — it reads as "LIVE" because nothing says otherwise. Expert: Label every artifact real, fixture, or mock honestly. A mock-labeled illustration is legitimate; a real-shaped manifest with the label silently missing is not — that omission is the exact failure mode a red-team review calls "a mock or visual artifact fak[ing] the hardest part." Detection: proof_manifest_audit.mjs fires undeclared-source-label (critical) whenever an artifact's sourceLabel is missing, independent of whether its other five fields are complete.

Stale Commit Or Partial State Coverage

Novice: Reuse last week's "it's live" GIF because recapturing feels slower than shipping, or attach five polished happy-path screenshots and call a control-panel PR done. Expert: Every manifest's commit matches the PR's current branch HEAD, and a control-panel PR's artifact set is checked against the full required-state list — active, historical, blocked, stale, gate, interrupt, receipt — not just the states that happened to screenshot well. Detection: proof_manifest_audit.mjs fires commit-mismatch (critical) when manifest.commit !== branchCommit, and control-panel-state-coverage-incomplete (critical) when isControlPanelPr is true but statesCovered is missing any required state.

References

FileLoad When
references/manifest-field-semantics.mdNeed to know what each of the six manifest fields proves, or whether a fixture/mock label is acceptable versus an absent one.
references/control-panel-state-coverage.mdNeed to decide whether a PR is control-panel-scoped, or which of the seven required states it still hasn't demonstrated.
examples/expected-output.mdNeed to see a bad manifest set audited, then the same set fixed and passing.
templates/output-template.mdNeed a reusable per-artifact manifest template to fill in while assembling a PR body.
schemas/proof-manifest-spec.schema.jsonNeed to validate a proof-manifest-spec JSON payload's structure before auditing it.
scripts/proof_manifest_audit.mjsNeed deterministic scoring of a PR's visual-evidence proof-manifest completeness and coverage.
agents/openai.yamlNeed a subagent descriptor for delegated proof-manifest auditing.

Layout QA gate (mechanical — run before shipping)

Before calling any rendered page, artifact, dashboard, deck, or component done, run the mechanical overflow/collision checker. It renders the page headlessly and flags text-vs-text collisions, clipped/ellipsis-truncated elements, text escaping its container, and horizontal page scroll — the visual defects a screenshot hides and that only appear at a specific width or in one theme.

Resolve layout-overflow-guard from the active skill catalog before running it. The command below shows the standard Claude install path; use the path reported by your harness. If the skill is absent, install or sync it instead of skipping this gate.

python3 ~/.claude/skills/layout-overflow-guard/scripts/check_layout.py <file-or-url> \
  --widths 1280,1100,860,720,390 --themes light,dark

You do not need to read check_layout.py — invoke it with the Bash tool and act on its report and exit code (non-zero = a defect). The script's source never enters your context; only its findings do. Drive it to zero violations across every width and both themes before you ship. Full detail: the layout-overflow-guard skill.

<!-- BEGIN BUNDLE INDEX (auto: index_references.py) -->

Skill Bundle Index

Every file in this skill, and when to open it. Auto-generated; run scripts/index_references.py --fix.

root

  • CHANGELOG.md — Agent Visual Evidence Manifest — Changelog — - Initial skill creation - Core proof-manifest-gate process defined - Reference files and deterministic proof_manifest_audit script added
  • README.md — Agent Visual Evidence Manifest — Verify that every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daem

agents/

examples/

  • examples/expected-output.md — Example Output: Agent Visual Evidence Manifest — Scenario: an agent finishes a control-panel change, attaches two screenshots to the PR, and reuses a GIF from last week's branch for the "li
  • examples/sample-input.json — sample input (data/schema)

references/

  • references/control-panel-state-coverage.md — Control-Panel State Coverage — Use this when you need to know which states a control-panel PR's proof-artifact set must cover, and why partial coverage (e.g.
  • references/manifest-field-semantics.md — Manifest Field Semantics — Use this when you need to know what each provenance field actually proves, why all six are required, and why an honest mock/fixture labe

schemas/

scripts/

templates/

  • templates/output-template.md — Proof Manifest Template — Fill in one block per artifact before opening or marking ready a PR that carries visual evidence.
<!-- END BUNDLE INDEX -->

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

curiositech의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고