본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

agentic-app-architecture

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(15)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • agents/INDEX.md164 B
  • agents/openai.yaml676 B
  • CHANGELOG.md181 B
  • examples/expected-output.md1.2 KB
  • examples/INDEX.md223 B
  • examples/sample-input.json1.5 KB
  • README.md1.2 KB
  • references/capabilities-and-execution-substrate.md1.8 KB
  • references/evidence-scope.md1013 B
  • references/interaction-surface-and-transparency.md1.8 KB
  • references/state-memory-and-context.md1.9 KB
  • schemas/agentic-app-spec.schema.json3.7 KB
  • scripts/agentic_app_audit.mjs10.0 KB
  • templates/output-template.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Agentic App Architecture

Make five design choices explicit before implementation: what a reviewer sees, which state exists and survives restore, how context is bounded, which powers and secret paths apply, and which controls govern effects. A declaration and its audit are static design evidence only; they do not establish shipped enforcement, provider behavior, account state, or a completed effect.

Five-axis procedure

flowchart TD
  Q[State app objective and effect class] --> T[Disclosure: actions evidence uncertainty; private reasoning stays private]
  T --> S[State: transcript task state user memory provenance retention restore/fork]
  S --> C[Context: bounded input cache eviction or memory promotion with rationale]
  C --> P[Capabilities: tools skills MCP and scoped secret custody]
  P --> E[Execution: isolation authority control and receipt policy]
  E --> V{Declared shape coherent?}
  V -->|no| R[Repair scope or rationale]
  V -->|yes| A[Static audit result only]
  1. Disclosure. Choose an action, evidence, and uncertainty disclosure level for the stated scope. Show useful summaries, proposed actions, evidence, and uncertainty where a reviewer needs them. Do not request or expose private chain-of-thought. Set an interrupt mode and explain when it applies.
  2. State. Declare separately whether conversation transcript, durable task state, user memory, and provenance evidence are used. For each app, state retention/deletion and restore/fork lineage. A feature marked not-applicable needs a scope rationale; it is not silently absent.
  3. Context. Choose one or more of bounded input, a versioned provider cache, eviction/summary, and memory promotion. A provider-cache declaration includes provider, model/family, primary documentation URL, and checked date. It is an input to cost evaluation, not a cross-provider rule.
  4. Capabilities. State whether tools, skills, and MCP are used. MCP is a protocol/topology choice, not a framework. For required secrets, declare the actual scope and custody path. argv and inline are exposure risks; a secret-store reference, scoped environment, or stdin may be appropriate only after reviewing process and logging boundaries.
  5. Effects. Classify effects as none, reversible local, or external/irreversible. Declare isolation, the authorization/control type, approval authority where relevant, receipt policy, and replay/compensation boundary. Low-risk or inapplicable controls require rationale; external/irreversible effects cannot declare control inapplicable.

Static-audit contract

Use the schema, template, and auditor. The CLI returns nonzero for an invalid declaration or an unresolved applicable high/critical finding. It never performs an effect or reads an account.

sequenceDiagram
  participant D as declared spec
  participant A as static auditor
  participant R as reviewer
  D->>A: validate shape and applicable controls
  A-->>R: findings, rationale gaps, scope statement
  R->>R: decide implementation and evidence plan
  Note over A,R: pass does not prove enforcement or execution

Worked scope check

A read-only local summarizer can declare effectClass: none, control.kind: not-applicable, no secrets, no MCP, and interruptMode: before-dispatch, each with a written rationale. It must still declare bounded input or another context strategy, state retention, and what action/evidence/uncertainty summary the reviewer receives.

A service that posts externally declares effectClass: external-or-irreversible, an isolation boundary, authority, a non-inapplicable control, provenance evidence, and a receipt/replay policy. The auditor checks that these claims cohere; an inert fixture can test unauthorized, stale, duplicate, or receipt-failure branches without sending anything.

Diagnostics

FindingMeaningRepair
invalid declarationRequired field, type, enum, non-finite MCP count, or cross-field shape is invalid.Repair JSON before interpreting scores.
missing action/evidence/uncertainty disclosureA tool or consequential effect lacks reviewer-facing disclosure.Select a proportionate disclosure level and rationale.
secret exposure pathRequired secret is argv, inline, or inapplicable.Change custody or narrow the stated scope.
missing consequential controlExternal/irreversible effect declares no applicable control.Declare authority and automated policy or human approval.
missing restore/provenance stateEffectful work cannot state restore/replay evidence.Add durable task state/provenance or revise the effect claim.

References

Bundle navigation

agents index, examples index.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

curiositech의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고