본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

coordination-verb-broker-migration

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(11)

  • SKILL.md12.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml860 B
  • CHANGELOG.md266 B
  • examples/expected-output.md8.8 KB
  • examples/sample-input.json1.9 KB
  • README.md1.3 KB
  • references/compliance-mode-gate-ladder.md3.8 KB
  • references/verb-collapse-migration-paths.md4.1 KB
  • schemas/broker-migration-spec.schema.json3.0 KB
  • scripts/broker_migration_audit.mjs11.0 KB
  • templates/output-template.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Coordination Verb Broker Migration

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has really shrunk — not grown — its legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools, with a real migration path and a hard compliance gate.

Use This For

  • Reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan before it ships, confirming every legacy verb maps to exactly one of work/act/ask/recall/status.
  • Verifying each of the 5 enforced tools carries one denial shape and one transcript event before advisory bodies are asked to depend on it.
  • Gating a body's promotion from advisory coordination (C0-C3) to enforced coordination (C4+) against the IT-018 Broker Collapse requirement of zero legacy-verb calls.
  • Catching a "parallel runtime truth" migration — a legacy verb kept alive as a second live code path instead of being retired to metadata, an alias, or documented history.
  • Producing a deterministic pass/fail signal for CI or a governance review, not a prose opinion about how the migration "feels."

Do Not Use This For

  • Deciding whether an inbound event should be allowed to spawn an agent at all (fleet-event-spawn-trust).
  • Specifying the cryptographic mechanism (signed capability token, macaroon, etc.) behind a broker tool's denial (agentic-zero-trust-security).
  • Designing how agents discover and invoke each other or shard work across a swarm (swarm-invocation-designer).

Collapse Gate

flowchart TD
  A[Enumerate every legacy etiquette verb] --> B{mappedTo one of work/act/ask/recall/status?}
  B -->|null or unrecognized| C[verb-unmapped: FAIL]
  B -->|yes| D{migrationPath is intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history?}
  D -->|anything else, incl. parallel-runtime| E[parallel-runtime-migration: FAIL]
  D -->|yes| F{Broker tool surface is exactly the 5?}
  F -->|extra tool| G[broker-grew: FAIL]
  F -->|missing tool| G2[broker-tool-missing: FAIL]
  F -->|exactly the 5| H{Every tool has denialShape AND transcriptEvent?}
  H -->|no| I[broker-tool-no-denial-or-transcript: FAIL]
  H -->|yes| J{complianceMode is C4 or above?}
  J -->|yes, and emitsLegacyVerbCalls| K[c4plus-emits-legacy-verbs: FAIL]
  J -->|no, or yes with zero legacy calls| L[PASS: broker has actually shrunk]
  1. Enumerate the full legacy-verb inventory. The documented collapse expects ~19 verbs; reconcile the spec's legacyVerbs list against that inventory before trusting anything downstream.
  2. Confirm every verb's mappedTo target. A null mapping, or a value that isn't one of the 5 canonical tools, means an old client can still call that verb forever with no enforced counterpart.
  3. Confirm every verb's migrationPath is a real retirement. Only intake-metadata, alias, and doc-history count. Anything else — named "parallel-runtime" or not — means a second live implementation still answers the same question as the new tool.
  4. Confirm the broker tool surface is exactly the 5. No bridge/shim/compat tool, and none of the 5 missing — a legacy verb mapped to a tool that doesn't exist is not actually migrated.
  5. Confirm every one of the 5 tools declares a denial shape and a transcript event. A tool that can't reject a call in one documented shape, or can't be proven to have run via one documented event, isn't auditable as enforced.
  6. Check the declared complianceMode. C0-C3 may still emit legacy-verb calls without penalty; C4 and above must prove emitsLegacyVerbCalls: false (see references/compliance-mode-gate-ladder.md for how to prove it from a transcript, not source code).
  7. Run scripts/broker_migration_audit.mjs and treat any critical finding as a hold on calling the migration done.

Output Contract

The scorer reads a JSON spec with these fields:

  • brokerTools[]: { name, denialShape: bool, transcriptEvent: bool } — should be exactly work/act/ask/recall/status.
  • legacyVerbs[]: { name, mappedTo: 'work'|'act'|'ask'|'recall'|'status'|null, migrationPath: 'intake-metadata'|'alias'|'doc-history'|'parallel-runtime' }.
  • complianceMode: 'C0'..'C6'.
  • emitsLegacyVerbCalls: boolean.

Use scripts/broker_migration_audit.mjs to audit that spec and return { pass, score, findings, recommendations }.

Anti-Patterns

The Silent Unmapped Verb

Novice: Ship a migration plan where a legacy verb is just... left off the mapping table, on the assumption someone will get to it later. Expert: Every legacy verb needs an explicit, valid mappedTo target before the plan counts as done — an absent or unrecognized mapping is exactly the verb an old client keeps calling forever with no enforced counterpart. Detection: broker_migration_audit.mjs fires verb-unmapped (critical) when a legacy verb's mappedTo is null or is not one of the 5 canonical tools, and legacy-inventory-incomplete (high) when the total verb count doesn't match the documented ~19.

The Bridge Tool ("just for now")

Novice: Add a 6th tool (legacy_bridge, verb_router, a "compat layer") to shim old callers over to new tools temporarily, and let it become permanent — or quietly drop one of the 5 while adding it. Expert: The broker surface is exactly 5 tools, forever, each fully equipped. Any 6th tool is the collapse failing to happen; any missing one of the 5 means legacy verbs are mapped to a tool that doesn't exist. Detection: Fires broker-grew (critical) when brokerTools contains a name outside work/act/ask/recall/status, broker-tool-missing (critical) when one of the 5 is absent, and broker-tool-no-denial-or-transcript (critical) when a present tool lacks a denial shape or a transcript event.

Parallel Runtime Truth

Novice: Keep a legacy verb's original implementation live "just in case," routing some callers to it and some to the new tool — and call that the migration. Then declare enforced compliance while the old calls quietly keep flowing. Expert: A legacy verb's real retirement path is intake-metadata, an alias, or documented history — never a second live code path. And a body claiming C4+ must prove, from its own transcript, that it makes zero legacy-verb calls — not just that its source code intends to stop. Detection: Fires parallel-runtime-migration (critical) when any legacy verb's migrationPath isn't intake-metadata/alias/doc-history, and c4plus-emits-legacy-verbs (critical) when a C4+ body's emitsLegacyVerbCalls is still true.

References

FileLoad When
references/verb-collapse-migration-paths.mdBuilding or reviewing the legacy-verb-to-tool mapping table, or deciding which of the 3 real retirement paths a verb should take.
references/compliance-mode-gate-ladder.mdGating a body's compliance-mode claim, or figuring out how to actually prove emitsLegacyVerbCalls: false.
examples/expected-output.mdNeed to see a bad migration audited, then the same migration fixed and passing.
examples/sample-input.jsonNeed a complete, passing broker-migration spec to start from.
templates/output-template.mdNeed a reusable migration gap report template to fill in.
schemas/broker-migration-spec.schema.jsonNeed to validate a broker-migration-spec JSON payload's structure before auditing it.
scripts/broker_migration_audit.mjsNeed deterministic scoring of a broker-collapse migration's completeness.
agents/openai.yamlNeed a subagent descriptor for delegated broker-migration auditing.
README.mdNeed the quick-start path through this skill's files.
CHANGELOG.mdNeed this skill's version history.
<!-- BEGIN BUNDLE INDEX (auto: index_references.py) -->

Skill Bundle Index

Every file in this skill, and when to open it. Auto-generated; run scripts/index_references.py --fix.

root

  • CHANGELOG.md — Coordination Verb Broker Migration — Changelog — - Initial skill creation - Core process defined: mapping → migration path → tool surface → compliance-mode gate - Reference files and determ
  • README.md — Coordination Verb Broker Migration — Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask

agents/

examples/

  • examples/expected-output.md — Example Output: Coordination Verb Broker Migration — Scenario: a team ships a "broker collapse" migration plan that looks done — it has a mapping table and a compliance-mode declaration — but o
  • examples/sample-input.json — sample input (data/schema)

references/

  • references/compliance-mode-gate-ladder.md — Compliance Mode Gate Ladder — Use this when you need to decide what a body's declared compliance mode (C0-C6) actually obligates it to, or when you're gating a body's
  • references/verb-collapse-migration-paths.md — Verb Collapse & Migration Paths — Use this when you need to build or review the legacy-verb-to-broker-tool mapping itself: which of the ~19 legacy etiquette verbs maps to whi

schemas/

scripts/

templates/

  • templates/output-template.md — Broker Migration Gap Report — Fill in every section before declaring a broker-collapse migration complete.
<!-- END BUNDLE INDEX -->

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 19일 업데이트

curiositech의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고