본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Collision-Zone Thinking

Force unrelated concepts together to discover emergent properties - "What if we treated X like Y?"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Collision-Zone Thinking

Overview

Revolutionary insights come from forcing unrelated concepts to collide. Treat X like Y and see what emerges.

Core principle: Deliberate metaphor-mixing generates novel solutions.

Quick Reference

Stuck OnTry Treating AsMight Discover
Code organizationDNA/geneticsMutation testing, evolutionary algorithms
Service architectureLego bricksComposable microservices, plug-and-play
Data managementWater flowStreaming, data lakes, flow-based systems
Request handlingPostal mailMessage queues, async processing
Error handlingCircuit breakersFault isolation, graceful degradation
AuthorizationBorder controlZero-trust, least privilege, audit logs
CachingHuman memoryForgetting curves, tiered memory (L1/L2/L3)

Process

  1. Pick two unrelated concepts from different domains
  2. Force combination: "What if we treated [A] like [B]?"
  3. Explore emergent properties: What new capabilities appear?
  4. Test boundaries: Where does the metaphor break?
  5. Extract insight: What did we learn?

Example Collision

Problem: Complex distributed system with cascading failures

Collision: "What if we treated services like electrical circuits?"

Emergent properties:

  • Circuit breakers (disconnect on overload)
  • Fuses (one-time failure protection)
  • Ground faults (error isolation)
  • Load balancing (current distribution)

Where it works: Preventing cascade failures Where it breaks: Circuits don't have retry logic Insight gained: Failure isolation patterns from electrical engineering

Best Source Domains for Collisions

  • Physics (thermodynamics, electrical, fluid dynamics)
  • Biology (evolution, immune system, neural networks)
  • Economics (supply/demand, markets, incentives)
  • Psychology (cognitive load, memory, attention)
  • Urban planning (traffic flow, zoning, infrastructure)

Red Flags You Need This

  • "I've tried everything in this domain"
  • Solutions feel incremental, not breakthrough
  • Stuck in conventional thinking
  • Need innovation, not optimization

Remember

  • Wild combinations often yield best insights
  • Test metaphor boundaries rigorously
  • Document even failed collisions (they teach)
  • The goal is insight extraction, not perfect metaphor

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

caveman

무료

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-cook

무료

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-fix

무료

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-plan

무료

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

DangQuangSE의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고