본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Scale Game

Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Scale Game

Overview

Test your approach at extreme scales to find what breaks and what surprisingly survives.

Core principle: Extremes expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales.

Quick Reference

Scale DimensionTest At ExtremesWhat It Reveals
Volume1 item vs 1B itemsAlgorithmic complexity limits, index needs
SpeedInstant vs year-longAsync requirements, caching needs, timeouts
Users1 user vs 1B usersConcurrency issues, resource limits, auth bottlenecks
DurationMilliseconds vs yearsMemory leaks, state growth, data rot
Failure rateNever fails vs always failsError handling adequacy, retry logic
Data size1 byte vs 1TBStorage strategy, streaming vs buffering

Process

  1. Pick dimension — What could vary extremely?
  2. Test minimum — What if this was 1000x smaller/faster/fewer?
  3. Test maximum — What if this was 1000x bigger/slower/more?
  4. Note what breaks — Where do limits appear?
  5. Note what survives — What's fundamentally sound?

Examples

Example 1: Error Handling

Normal scale: "Handle errors when they occur" works fine At 1B scale: Error volume overwhelms logging, crashes system Reveals: Need to make errors impossible (type systems, contracts) or expect them (chaos engineering, circuit breakers)

Example 2: Synchronous APIs

Normal scale: Direct function calls work At global scale: Network latency makes synchronous calls unusable Reveals: Async/messaging becomes survival requirement, not optimization

Example 3: In-Memory State

Normal duration: Works for hours/days At years: Memory grows unbounded, eventual crash Reveals: Need persistence or periodic cleanup — cannot rely on process memory

Example 4: Single DB Write Path

Normal load: One writer, no contention At 10k concurrent writes: Deadlocks, lock contention, queue buildup Reveals: Need optimistic locking, write batching, or event sourcing

Red Flags You Need This

  • "It works in dev" (but will it work under production load?)
  • No idea where the limits are
  • "Should scale fine" (without testing or analysis)
  • Surprised by production behavior
  • First time this code will see real users

Remember

  • Extremes reveal fundamentals
  • What works at one scale often fails at another
  • Test both directions (bigger AND smaller)
  • Use insights to validate architecture early — cheaper to change now

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

caveman

무료

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-cook

무료

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-fix

무료

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-plan

무료

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

DangQuangSE의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고