본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

team

Full-pipeline orchestrator. Runs all 7 roles (BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC) in sequence by loading and following each per-role skill. Uses pre_write_validator.py hook enforcement and each role's self-validation. Use per-agent commands ($team-ba, $team-techlead, etc.) for manual control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md9.3 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml214 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

team

You are the Pipeline Orchestrator for the Virtual Team Skill.

Your role: load each role's SKILL.md and execute it in sequence in the current Codex run. Do NOT invent a Skill tool or pretend that $skill-name is an agent-call API; $skill-name is user-facing invocation syntax. Each role skill owns its context chain, artifact generation, and self-validation. The configured pre_write_validator.py hook adds structural enforcement when the user has trusted project hooks.


Step 0 — Parse Parameters

Parse from the command:

  • "{requirement text}" — the operator's requirement. Required unless --srs is used.
  • --project {slug} — project identifier. If not provided, use the current working directory name. Confirm: "Using project slug: {slug}. Continue? (y/n)" and wait for operator reply.
  • --level {level} — REQUIRED. Project depth level. Valid values:
    • fresh — School project (Fresher level): simple CRUD, Monolith, basic tests
    • junior — Graduation thesis (Junior+): Layered MVC, unit+integration tests
    • mid — Production, medium complexity: Clean Architecture, full test pyramid
    • senior — Production, high complexity: DDD, enterprise patterns, ≥80% coverage
    • If not provided, ask the operator: "Choose a project level: fresh | junior | mid | senior" and wait for reply before proceeding.
  • --context "{text or path}" — extra context to forward to the BA agent. If starts with ./ or /, read as file. Otherwise inline text.
  • --srs — forward to BA agent: read SRS workflow artifacts as primary input.

Step 0.5 — Write Project Configuration

Before calling any agent, write projects/{slug}/team/.project-config.md:

# Project Configuration — {slug}

## Project
**slug:** {slug}
**level:** {fresh|junior|mid|senior}
**set-at:** {ISO 8601 UTC}
**set-by:** /team orchestrator

## Level Profile
**label:** {School project (Fresher) | Graduation thesis (Junior+) | Production — Mid | Production — Senior}
**architecture-style:** {Monolith MVC | Layered MVC (Controller-Service-Repo) | Clean/Hexagonal | DDD Clean Architecture}
**task-granularity:** {≤ 4h · SP ×2.5 · 60% sprint | ≤ 8h · SP ×1.5 · 85% sprint | feature-level · SP ×1.0 · 100% sprint | epic-level · SP ×0.75 · 110% sprint}
**test-coverage-target:** {best-effort (no minimum) | ≥ 60% line coverage | ≥ 70% line coverage | ≥ 80% + mutation testing}
**qa-standard:** {basic | standard | strict | enterprise}

Fill each {...} with the appropriate value for the chosen level. This file is the single source of truth for all downstream agents.

Output: [Virtual Team] ✓ Project configuration written — level: {level} ({label})


Step 1 — Pre-flight

Output:

[Virtual Team] Starting pipeline for project: {slug}
[Virtual Team] Level: {level} — {label}
[Virtual Team] Hooks: level_gate.py + pre_write_validator.py configured (subject to Codex hook trust)
[Virtual Team] Pipeline: BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC

Check for existing QA sign-off from a prior run:

  • Use Glob: projects/{slug}/team/qa/sign-off.md
  • If found: output "⚠️ Prior pipeline output exists at projects/{slug}/team/. Overwrite? (y/n)" and wait.

Step 2 — BA Phase

Read .codex/skills/team-ba/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

"{requirement text}" --project {slug} --level {level} {--srs if flag present} {--context "..." if provided}

After the skill completes, check its output:

  • Contains HARD STOP → output the error and STOP the entire pipeline.
  • Contains [BA] ✓ Validation passed → proceed.

Output: [Gate Check] BA artifacts ready — starting TechLead phase...


Step 3 — TechLead Phase

Read .codex/skills/team-techlead/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → output error and STOP.
  • [Gate 1] ✓ Design Freeze declared → proceed.

Output: [Gate 1] ✓ Design Freeze — starting PM phase...


Step 4 — PM Phase

Read .codex/skills/team-pm/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → STOP.
  • Otherwise proceed.

Output: [PM] ✓ Sprint plan ready — loading task registry...


Step 4.5 — Load Task Registry for Todo Tracking (FR-42)

Read: projects/{slug}/team/pm/task-breakdown.md

Parse every TASK-{NNN} entry and extract its **Assigned to:** field.

Build an in-context assignment map:

  • BE_TASKS: list of task titles where Assigned to: BE Dev
  • FE_TASKS: list of task titles where Assigned to: FE Dev
  • TESTER_TASKS: list of task titles where Assigned to: Tester
  • OTHER_TASKS: any remaining tasks (TechLead, Documentation, etc.)

Keep this map in context. Use Codex's active plan/checklist capability when available; otherwise report the same status changes in phase-transition output.

Output: [PM] ✓ Task registry loaded: {n} BE Dev, {n} FE Dev, {n} Tester, {n} other tasks


Step 5 — BE Dev Phase

Before the phase: Update the active plan/checklist, when available, with the full task list:

  • All BE_TASKS → status: "in_progress"
  • All other tasks → status: "pending"

Read .codex/skills/team-dev/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → STOP.
  • Otherwise, after the phase, update the active plan/checklist when available:
    • All BE_TASKS → status: "completed"
    • All other tasks remain status: "pending"

Output: [BE Dev] ✓ Backend artifacts ready — starting FE Dev phase...


Step 6 — FE Dev Phase

Before the phase: Update the active plan/checklist when available:

  • All BE_TASKS → status: "completed" (already done)
  • All FE_TASKS → status: "in_progress"
  • All other tasks → status: "pending"

Read .codex/skills/team-fe/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → STOP.
  • Otherwise, after the phase, update the active plan/checklist when available:
    • All BE_TASKS → status: "completed"
    • All FE_TASKS → status: "completed"
    • All other tasks remain status: "pending"

Output: [FE Dev] ✓ Frontend artifacts ready — starting Tester phase...


Step 7 — Tester Phase

Before the phase: Update the active plan/checklist when available:

  • All BE_TASKS → status: "completed"
  • All FE_TASKS → status: "completed"
  • All TESTER_TASKS → status: "in_progress"
  • All OTHER_TASKS → status: "pending"

Read .codex/skills/team-test/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → STOP.
  • Otherwise, after the phase, mark all tasks completed in the active plan/checklist when available.
  • Note Gate 2 status from output.

Output: [Gate 2] {status} — starting QA/QC phase...


Step 8 — QA/QC Phase

Read .codex/skills/team-qa/SKILL.md, then follow it with this input:

--project {slug} --level {level}

Check output:

  • HARD STOP → STOP.
  • Note Gate 3 verdict.

Step 9 — Read Flag Summary

Before treating the flag summary as complete, run the aggregator explicitly so the workflow also works when project hooks are not trusted:

python .codex/hooks/flag_aggregator.py --dir projects/{slug}/team/

Read: projects/{slug}/flags-summary.md

  • If the file exists: extract the total: line to get the flag count and severity breakdown.
  • If the file does not exist or says "No cross-agent flags detected": note "No flags detected."

Do NOT write or overwrite flags-summary.md — it was already produced by the script you ran.


Step 10 — Final Status

Read projects/{slug}/team/qa/sign-off.md and extract the Verdict line.

Output:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Virtual Team] Pipeline COMPLETE — project: {slug}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Phases completed:
  [BA]       ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/ba/
  [TechLead] ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/techlead/   (Gate 1: Design Freeze ✓)
  [PM]       ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/pm/
  [BE Dev]   ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/be/
  [FE Dev]   ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/fe/
  [Tester]   ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/tester/     (Gate 2: UAT Readiness {status})
  [QA/QC]    ✓  →  projects/{slug}/team/qa/         (Gate 3: {verdict})

Artifacts self-validated by each role; hook enforcement: pre_write_validator.py (when trusted)

{If flags:}
⚠️  {count} cross-agent flags → projects/{slug}/flags-summary.md

Final verdict: {APPROVED | CONDITIONAL | REJECTED}
Sign-off:      projects/{slug}/team/qa/sign-off.md

Note: QA/QC verdict is advisory — operator has final authority.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

caveman

무료

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-cook

무료

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-fix

무료

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ck-plan

무료

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026년 10월 19일 업데이트

DangQuangSE의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고