본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Science

Structure problem solving around clear goals, competing explanations, experiments, and measurable results. Use the cycle to diagnose bugs, validate features, compare prompts, or evaluate an early product, then choose the next step based on evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

The scientific method as a universal problem-solving algorithm — goal-first, plural falsifiable hypotheses, designed experiments, and honest measurement, scaling from TDD to feature validation to MVP launch. USE WHEN think about, figure out, experiment, iterate, optimize, hypothesis, science, full cycle, quick diagnosis, structured investigation, how do we test, analyze results. NOT FOR multi-angle lens passes (use IterativeDepth).

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Diagnosing a bug with a quick investigation
  • Comparing prompt structures through experiments
  • Defining success criteria for a feature
  • Evaluating an early product and planning improvements

포함된 파일(14)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • Examples.md4.4 KB
  • Methodology.md16.2 KB
  • Protocol.md11.0 KB
  • Templates.md3.4 KB
  • Workflows/AnalyzeResults.md6.2 KB
  • Workflows/DefineGoal.md4.7 KB
  • Workflows/DesignExperiment.md8.4 KB
  • Workflows/FullCycle.md10.4 KB
  • Workflows/GenerateHypotheses.md5.9 KB
  • Workflows/Iterate.md7.6 KB
  • Workflows/MeasureResults.md6.4 KB
  • Workflows/QuickDiagnosis.md3.6 KB
  • Workflows/StructuredInvestigation.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Customization

Before executing, check for user customizations at: ~/.claude/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Science/

If this directory exists, load and apply any PREFERENCES.md, configurations, or resources found there. These override default behavior. If the directory does not exist, proceed with skill defaults.

🚨 MANDATORY: Voice Notification (REQUIRED BEFORE ANY ACTION)

You MUST send this notification BEFORE doing anything else when this skill is invoked.

  1. Send voice notification:

    curl -s -X POST http://localhost:31337/notify \
      -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
      -d '{"message": "Running the WORKFLOWNAME workflow in the Science skill to ACTION"}' \
      > /dev/null 2>&1 &
    
  2. Output text notification:

    Running the **WorkflowName** workflow in the **Science** skill to ACTION...
    

This is not optional. Execute this curl command immediately upon skill invocation.

Science - The Universal Algorithm

What It Does

Applies the scientific method as a general problem-solving algorithm: define the goal first, generate multiple hypotheses, design experiments that can fail, measure honestly, analyze against the goal, iterate. Seven core workflows plus two diagnostic shortcuts (quick 15-minute debugging and structured multi-factor investigation). It scales from micro (TDD) to meso (feature validation) to macro (MVP launch).

The Problem

Most problem-solving is guessing dressed up as work. You pick the first idea that comes to mind, change something, and call it done when it "seems better" — which is confirmation bias, not progress. Without a clear definition of success you can't tell whether a change helped, so you keep tweaking forever or stop too early. Single-hypothesis thinking means you only ever test the idea you already believed. This skill forces the discipline that fixes all of that: a stated goal, at least three competing hypotheses, falsifiable tests, and measurement that compares to the goal rather than to your hopes.

How It Works

The whole thing is one repeating cycle, and the goal anchors it — without clear success criteria you cannot judge results:

GOAL -----> What does success look like?
   |
OBSERVE --> What is the current state?
   |
HYPOTHESIZE -> What might work? (Generate MULTIPLE)
   |
EXPERIMENT -> Design and run the test
   |
MEASURE --> What happened? (Data collection)
   |
ANALYZE --> How does it compare to the goal?
   |
ITERATE --> Adjust hypothesis and repeat
   |
   +------> Back to HYPOTHESIZE

The answer emerges from the cycle, not from guessing.


Workflow Routing

Output when executing: Running the **WorkflowName** workflow in the **Science** skill to ACTION...

Core Workflows

WorkflowTriggerFile
DefineGoal"define the goal", "what are we trying to achieve"Workflows/DefineGoal.md
GenerateHypotheses"what might work", "ideas", "hypotheses"Workflows/GenerateHypotheses.md
DesignExperiment"how do we test", "experiment design"Workflows/DesignExperiment.md
MeasureResults"what happened", "measure", "results"Workflows/MeasureResults.md
AnalyzeResults"analyze", "compare to goal"Workflows/AnalyzeResults.md
Iterate"iterate", "try again", "next cycle"Workflows/Iterate.md
FullCycleFull structured cycleWorkflows/FullCycle.md

Diagnostic Workflows

WorkflowTriggerFile
QuickDiagnosisQuick debugging (15-min rule)Workflows/QuickDiagnosis.md
StructuredInvestigationComplex investigationWorkflows/StructuredInvestigation.md

Resource Index

ResourceDescription
Methodology.mdDeep dive into each phase
Protocol.mdHow skills implement Science
Templates.mdGoal, Hypothesis, Experiment, Results templates
Examples.mdWorked examples across scales

Domain Applications

DomainManifestationRelated Skill
CodingTDD (Red-Green-Refactor)Development
ProductsMVP -> Measure -> IterateDevelopment
ResearchQuestion -> Study -> AnalyzeResearch
PromptsPrompt -> Eval -> IterateEvals
DecisionsOptions -> Council -> ChooseCouncil

Scale of Application

LevelCycle TimeExample
MicroMinutesTDD: test, code, refactor
MesoHours-DaysFeature: spec, implement, validate
MacroWeeks-MonthsProduct: MVP, launch, measure PMF

Integration Points

PhaseSkills to Invoke
GoalCouncil for validation
ObserveResearch for context
HypothesizeCouncil for ideas, RedTeam for stress-test
ExperimentDevelopment (Worktrees) for parallel tests
MeasureEvals for structured measurement
AnalyzeCouncil for multi-perspective analysis

Anti-Patterns

BadGood
"Make it better""Reduce load time from 3s to 1s"
"I think X will work""Here are 3 approaches: X, Y, Z"
"Prove I'm right""Design test that could disprove"
"Pretend failure didn't happen""What did we learn?"
"Keep experimenting forever""Ship and learn from production"

Gotchas

  • Minimum 3 hypotheses before testing. Single-hypothesis testing is confirmation bias — going straight to a single test is trial-and-error, not science.
  • Measurements must be specific and reproducible. "It seems better" is not a measurement.
  • Full cycle is for systematic investigation. For quick debugging, use quick diagnosis mode.

Examples

Example 1: Quick diagnosis

User: "figure out why Surface time filters show stale items"
→ Quick diagnosis mode
→ Hypothesis: timestamp format mismatch in D1
→ Test: query D1 for actual stored format
→ Analyze: compare stored vs expected format
→ Result: ISO string vs Unix timestamp mismatch

Example 2: Full systematic investigation

User: "experiment with different prompt structures for better output"
→ Full cycle mode
→ 3+ hypotheses generated
→ Controlled experiments with measurements
→ Analysis identifies winning approach
→ Iterates until convergence

Execution Log

After completing any workflow, append a single JSONL entry:

echo '{"ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","skill":"Science","workflow":"WORKFLOW_USED","input":"8_WORD_SUMMARY","status":"ok|error","duration_s":SECONDS}' >> ~/.claude/LIFEOS/MEMORY/SKILLS/execution.jsonl

Replace WORKFLOW_USED with the workflow executed, 8_WORD_SUMMARY with a brief input description, and SECONDS with approximate wall-clock time. Log status: "error" if the workflow failed.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Compare a component's own design needs with the goals of the larger system through three structured passes. The result identifies conflicts, recommends an appropriate scope, and assesses whether the proposed design fits the whole.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Choosing between a service, a library, and inline code
  • Comparing feature requests with product goals
  • Checking how new components fit an existing system
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Aphorisms

무료

Find quotes that fit a text’s themes, with attribution and a short reason for each suggestion. Add sourced quotes, research thinkers, and organize a quote collection by theme and usage history to avoid repetition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Finding a fitting quote for a newsletter
  • Saving sourced quotes without duplicates
  • Researching a thinker’s quotes by theme
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Apify

무료

Collect social posts, business listings, and product reviews through Apify actors, ready-made data collection tools. Filter results by date, rating, or engagement in code before sending relevant records to the AI for research or lead generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Find competitors' most popular social posts
  • Build a contact list of local businesses
  • Extract recent negative Amazon reviews
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Art

무료

Create blog illustrations, technical diagrams, comparisons, comics, and icons through workflows tailored to each format. The skill guides composition, color, and model selection, then stages generated images for review before they are used in a project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating blog header illustrations
  • Explaining a system with a technical diagram
  • Visualizing comparisons and timelines
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

ArXiv

무료

Find arXiv papers by topic, research category, or paper ID. Retrieve titles, authors, abstracts, and links, check new submissions, and add AlphaXiv's AI-generated overviews when available to help decide which papers to read.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking new AI and machine learning papers
  • Finding papers on a specific research topic
  • Looking up a paper by its ID or arXiv URL
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

Clean spoken recordings by transcribing words, identifying filler and false starts, and joining cuts with short audio fades. Preview proposed edits, reduce breaths, repair noise-gate clicks, and optionally use Cleanvoice for additional cloud processing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Removing filler words and long silences from a podcast
  • Reviewing proposed edits before applying them
  • Repairing clicks caused by a noise gate
danielmiessler/LifeOS2만2026년 9월 4일 업데이트

danielmiessler의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고