본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

concurrency-review

Review Java concurrency code for thread safety, race conditions, deadlocks, and modern patterns (Virtual Threads, CompletableFuture, @Async). Use when user asks "check thread safety", "concurrency review", "async code review", or when reviewing multi-threaded code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md12.0 KB
  • README.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Concurrency Review Skill

Review Java concurrent code for correctness, safety, and modern best practices.

Why This Matters

Nearly 60% of multithreaded applications encounter issues due to improper management of shared resources. - ACM Study

Concurrency bugs are:

  • Hard to reproduce - timing-dependent
  • Hard to test - may only appear under load
  • Hard to debug - non-deterministic behavior

This skill helps catch issues before they reach production.

When to Use

  • Reviewing code with synchronized, volatile, Lock
  • Checking @Async, CompletableFuture, ExecutorService
  • Validating thread safety of shared state
  • Reviewing Virtual Threads / Structured Concurrency code
  • Any code accessed by multiple threads

Modern Java (21/25): Virtual Threads

When to Use Virtual Threads

// ✅ Perfect for I/O-bound tasks (HTTP, DB, file I/O)
try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
    for (Request request : requests) {
        executor.submit(() -> callExternalApi(request));
    }
}

// ❌ Not beneficial for CPU-bound tasks
// Use platform threads / ForkJoinPool instead

Rule of thumb: If your app never has 10,000+ concurrent tasks, virtual threads may not provide significant benefit.

Java 25: Synchronized Pinning Fixed

In Java 21-23, virtual threads became "pinned" when entering synchronized blocks with blocking operations. Java 25 fixes this (JEP 491).

// In Java 21-23: ⚠️ Could cause pinning
synchronized (lock) {
    blockingIoCall();  // Virtual thread pinned to carrier
}

// In Java 25: ✅ No longer an issue
// But consider ReentrantLock for explicit control anyway

ScopedValue Over ThreadLocal

// ❌ ThreadLocal problematic with virtual threads
private static final ThreadLocal<User> currentUser = new ThreadLocal<>();

// ✅ ScopedValue (Java 21+ preview, improved in 25)
private static final ScopedValue<User> CURRENT_USER = ScopedValue.newInstance();

ScopedValue.where(CURRENT_USER, user).run(() -> {
    // CURRENT_USER.get() available here and in child virtual threads
    processRequest();
});

Structured Concurrency (Java 25 Preview)

// ✅ Structured concurrency - tasks tied to scope lifecycle
try (StructuredTaskScope.ShutdownOnFailure scope = new StructuredTaskScope.ShutdownOnFailure()) {
    Subtask<User> userTask = scope.fork(() -> fetchUser(id));
    Subtask<Orders> ordersTask = scope.fork(() -> fetchOrders(id));

    scope.join();            // Wait for all
    scope.throwIfFailed();   // Propagate exceptions

    return new Profile(userTask.get(), ordersTask.get());
}
// All subtasks automatically cancelled if scope exits

Spring @Async Pitfalls

1. Forgetting @EnableAsync

// ❌ @Async silently ignored
@Service
public class EmailService {
    @Async
    public void sendEmail(String to) { }
}

// ✅ Enable async processing
@Configuration
@EnableAsync
public class AsyncConfig { }

2. Calling Async from Same Class

@Service
public class OrderService {

    // ❌ Bypasses proxy - runs synchronously!
    public void processOrder(Order order) {
        sendConfirmation(order);  // Direct call, not async
    }

    @Async
    public void sendConfirmation(Order order) { }
}

// ✅ Inject self or use separate service
@Service
public class OrderService {
    @Autowired
    private EmailService emailService;  // Separate bean

    public void processOrder(Order order) {
        emailService.sendConfirmation(order);  // Proxy call, async works
    }
}

3. @Async on Non-Public Methods

// ❌ Non-public methods - proxy can't intercept
@Async
private void processInBackground() { }

@Async
protected void processInBackground() { }

// ✅ Must be public
@Async
public void processInBackground() { }

4. Default Executor Creates Thread Per Task

// ❌ Default SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor - creates new thread each time!
// Can cause OutOfMemoryError under load

// ✅ Configure proper thread pool
@Configuration
@EnableAsync
public class AsyncConfig {

    @Bean
    public Executor taskExecutor() {
        ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
        executor.setCorePoolSize(10);
        executor.setMaxPoolSize(50);
        executor.setQueueCapacity(100);
        executor.setThreadNamePrefix("async-");
        executor.setRejectedExecutionHandler(new CallerRunsPolicy());
        executor.initialize();
        return executor;
    }
}

5. SecurityContext Not Propagating

// ❌ SecurityContextHolder is ThreadLocal-bound
@Async
public void auditAction() {
    // SecurityContextHolder.getContext() is NULL here!
    String user = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getName();
}

// ✅ Use DelegatingSecurityContextAsyncTaskExecutor
@Bean
public Executor taskExecutor() {
    ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
    // ... configure ...
    return new DelegatingSecurityContextAsyncTaskExecutor(executor);
}

CompletableFuture Patterns

Error Handling

// ❌ Exception silently swallowed
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> riskyOperation());
// If riskyOperation throws, nobody knows

// ✅ Always handle exceptions
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> riskyOperation())
    .exceptionally(ex -> {
        log.error("Operation failed", ex);
        return fallbackValue;
    });

// ✅ Or use handle() for both success and failure
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> riskyOperation())
    .handle((result, ex) -> {
        if (ex != null) {
            log.error("Failed", ex);
            return fallbackValue;
        }
        return result;
    });

Timeout Handling (Java 9+)

// ✅ Fail after timeout
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> slowOperation())
    .orTimeout(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);  // Throws TimeoutException

// ✅ Return default after timeout
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> slowOperation())
    .completeOnTimeout(defaultValue, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

Combining Futures

// ✅ Wait for all
CompletableFuture.allOf(future1, future2, future3)
    .thenRun(() -> log.info("All completed"));

// ✅ Wait for first
CompletableFuture.anyOf(future1, future2, future3)
    .thenAccept(result -> log.info("First result: {}", result));

// ✅ Combine results
future1.thenCombine(future2, (r1, r2) -> merge(r1, r2));

Use Appropriate Executor

// ❌ CPU-bound task in ForkJoinPool.commonPool (default)
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> cpuIntensiveWork());

// ✅ Custom executor for blocking/I/O operations
ExecutorService ioExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(20);
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> blockingIoCall(), ioExecutor);

// ✅ In Java 21+, virtual threads for I/O
ExecutorService virtualExecutor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor();
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> blockingIoCall(), virtualExecutor);

Classic Concurrency Issues

Race Conditions: Check-Then-Act

// ❌ Race condition
if (!map.containsKey(key)) {
    map.put(key, computeValue());  // Another thread may have added it
}

// ✅ Atomic operation
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> computeValue());

// ❌ Race condition with counter
if (count < MAX) {
    count++;  // Read-check-write is not atomic
}

// ✅ Atomic counter
AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger();
count.updateAndGet(c -> c < MAX ? c + 1 : c);

Visibility: Missing volatile

// ❌ Other threads may never see the update
private boolean running = true;

public void stop() {
    running = false;  // May not be visible to other threads
}

public void run() {
    while (running) { }  // May loop forever
}

// ✅ Volatile ensures visibility
private volatile boolean running = true;

Non-Atomic long/double

// ❌ 64-bit read/write is non-atomic on 32-bit JVMs
private long counter;

public void increment() {
    counter++;  // Not atomic!
}

// ✅ Use AtomicLong or synchronization
private AtomicLong counter = new AtomicLong();

// ✅ Or volatile (for single-writer scenarios)
private volatile long counter;

Double-Checked Locking

// ❌ Broken without volatile
private static Singleton instance;

public static Singleton getInstance() {
    if (instance == null) {
        synchronized (Singleton.class) {
            if (instance == null) {
                instance = new Singleton();  // May be seen partially constructed
            }
        }
    }
    return instance;
}

// ✅ Correct with volatile
private static volatile Singleton instance;

// ✅ Or use holder class idiom
private static class Holder {
    static final Singleton INSTANCE = new Singleton();
}

public static Singleton getInstance() {
    return Holder.INSTANCE;
}

Deadlocks: Lock Ordering

// ❌ Potential deadlock
// Thread 1: lock(A) -> lock(B)
// Thread 2: lock(B) -> lock(A)

public void transfer(Account from, Account to, int amount) {
    synchronized (from) {
        synchronized (to) {
            // Transfer logic
        }
    }
}

// ✅ Consistent lock ordering
public void transfer(Account from, Account to, int amount) {
    Account first = from.getId() < to.getId() ? from : to;
    Account second = from.getId() < to.getId() ? to : from;

    synchronized (first) {
        synchronized (second) {
            // Transfer logic
        }
    }
}

Thread-Safe Collections

Choose the Right Collection

Use CaseWrongRight
Concurrent reads/writesHashMapConcurrentHashMap
Frequent iterationConcurrentHashMapCopyOnWriteArrayList
Producer-consumerArrayListBlockingQueue
Sorted concurrentTreeMapConcurrentSkipListMap

ConcurrentHashMap Pitfalls

// ❌ Non-atomic compound operation
if (!map.containsKey(key)) {
    map.put(key, value);
}

// ✅ Atomic
map.putIfAbsent(key, value);
map.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> createValue());

// ❌ Nested compute can deadlock
map.compute(key1, (k, v) -> {
    return map.compute(key2, ...);  // Deadlock risk!
});

Concurrency Review Checklist

🔴 High Severity (Likely Bugs)

  • No check-then-act on shared state without synchronization
  • No synchronized calling external/unknown code (deadlock risk)
  • volatile present for double-checked locking
  • Non-volatile fields not read in loops waiting for updates
  • ConcurrentHashMap.compute() doesn't call other map operations
  • @Async methods are public and called from different beans

🟡 Medium Severity (Potential Issues)

  • Thread pools properly sized and named
  • CompletableFuture exceptions handled (exceptionally/handle)
  • SecurityContext propagated to async tasks if needed
  • ExecutorService properly shut down
  • Lock.unlock() in finally block
  • Thread-safe collections used for shared data

🟢 Modern Patterns (Java 21/25)

  • Virtual threads used for I/O-bound concurrent tasks
  • ScopedValue considered over ThreadLocal
  • Structured concurrency for related subtasks
  • Timeouts on CompletableFuture operations

📝 Documentation

  • Thread safety documented on shared classes
  • Locking order documented for nested locks
  • Each volatile usage justified

Analysis Commands

# Find synchronized blocks
grep -rn "synchronized" --include="*.java"

# Find @Async methods
grep -rn "@Async" --include="*.java"

# Find volatile fields
grep -rn "volatile" --include="*.java"

# Find thread pool creation
grep -rn "Executors\.\|ThreadPoolExecutor\|ExecutorService" --include="*.java"

# Find CompletableFuture without error handling
grep -rn "CompletableFuture\." --include="*.java" | grep -v "exceptionally\|handle\|whenComplete"

# Find ThreadLocal (consider ScopedValue in Java 21+)
grep -rn "ThreadLocal" --include="*.java"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Review REST API contracts for HTTP semantics, versioning, backward compatibility, and response consistency. Use when user asks "review API", "check endpoints", "REST review", or before releasing API changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

Analyze Java project architecture at macro level - package structure, module boundaries, dependency direction, and layering. Use when user asks "review architecture", "check structure", "package organization", or when evaluating if a codebase follows clean architecture principles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

Generate changelogs from git commits. Use when user says "generate changelog", "update changelog", "what changed since last release", or before preparing a new release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

Clean Code principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), naming, function design and readability. Use when code is hard to read, with long methods, unclear names, duplication or deep nesting. For how responsibilities are split across classes and which way dependencies point, use solid-principles instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

Common design patterns with Java examples (Factory, Builder, Strategy, Observer, Decorator, etc.). Use when user asks "implement pattern", "use factory", "strategy pattern", or when designing extensible components.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

Generate conventional commit messages for Java projects. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", "commit changes", or after completing code changes that need to be committed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

decebals/claude-code-java7582026년 9월 7일 업데이트

decebals의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고