본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ddd

Strategic DDD guide for this project. Use to split the domain into bounded contexts, define ubiquitous language, create new business modules, or analyze context boundaries. Tactical patterns follow Clean Architecture (see architecture skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Domain-Driven Design - Strategic Guide

Persona

Read .claude/roles/architect.md — adopt this profile and follow all its rules.

Activation

This skill activates for high-level domain decisions:

  • Splitting into Bounded Contexts
  • Defining the Ubiquitous Language
  • Creating a new business module
  • Analyzing relationships between contexts

Important clarification

Clean Architecture definitions take precedence over DDD tactical definitions.

We use DDD only at the strategic level (domain splitting, language). Tactical patterns (Entities, Use Cases, Gateways, Presenters) follow Clean Architecture.

What we take from DDDWhat we do NOT take
Bounded ContextsAggregates
Ubiquitous LanguageRepositories (we have Gateways)
Context MappingDomain Events
Module splittingComplex Value Objects

Bounded Context

"A Bounded Context delimits the applicability of a particular model." — Eric Evans

A Bounded Context = a module in modules/<context-name>/

Each BC is an autonomous package with its own public API.

Identifying a Bounded Context

Signs that a new BC is needed:

  • The same term has different meanings depending on context
  • A different team could manage this part
  • The model is becoming too complex
  • Business rules are diverging

ReviewFlow example:

Bounded ContextResponsibility
reviewCode review orchestration and result handling
trackingMR/PR assignment tracking and follow-up
webhookInbound webhook processing (GitLab/GitHub)
mcpModel Context Protocol server and tools
dashboardReview statistics and visualization
securitySecret detection and access control

Communication between Bounded Contexts

BCs communicate via their public APIs, like two independent packages.

// modules/tracking/index.ts (public API)
export { TrackAssignmentUseCase } from "./application/usecases/trackAssignment.usecase"
export { createTrackedMr } from "./domain/factories/trackedMrFactory"
export type { TrackingGateway } from "./application/ports/gateways/trackingGateway"

// modules/review/ imports from the public API
import { TrackAssignmentUseCase } from "@/modules/tracking"

Communication rules

AllowedForbidden
Import from another BC's index.tsDirectly import an internal file
Pass data (DTO, primitives)Share mutable entities
Call an exposed Use CaseAccess internal state

Concrete example

// modules/review/application/usecases/triggerReview.usecase.ts
import { TrackAssignmentUseCase } from "@/modules/tracking"  // Public API

export const triggerReview = async (data) => {
  const trackAssignment = new TrackAssignmentUseCase(trackingGateway);
  // ...
}
// FORBIDDEN - internal import
import { parseTrackingData } from "@/modules/tracking/domain/validators/trackingValidator"

Ubiquitous Language

"Use the model as the backbone of a language." — Eric Evans

Business vocabulary must be:

  • Consistent: same term = same concept within a given context
  • Explicit: no ambiguity
  • Shared: understood by devs AND business stakeholders

In code

// Ubiquitous Language respected
class ReviewContext { ... }
class TrackedMr { ... }
function triggerReview() { ... }
function trackAssignment() { ... }

// Technical or ambiguous vocabulary
class Data { ... }           // "Data" is not a business term
class ReviewRequest { }      // "Request" vs "ReviewContext"?
function doReview() { }      // "do" vs "trigger"?

Language documentation

Each BC maintains its glossary in /docs/business/glossary/<context>.md

# Glossary - Review

| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| ReviewContext | The full context for a code review (diff, MR metadata, threads) |
| TrackedMr | A merge request being tracked for review assignments |
| ReviewAction | An action to perform on the platform (comment, resolve, reply) |
| DiffMetadata | Parsed metadata from a merge request diff |

Workflow: Creating a new Bounded Context

Step 1: Identify the domain

DDD - Identification

New domain identified: [name]

Questions to validate:
1. What business problem does it solve?
2. What are the specific terms?
3. What are the main entities?
4. Which existing BCs will use it?

Shall we explore these questions?

Step 2: Define the language

DDD - Ubiquitous Language

Proposed glossary for [context]:

| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| ... | ... |

Are these terms aligned with the business vocabulary?

Step 3: Define the public API

DDD - Public API

Planned exports for [context]:

Entities: [list]
Use Cases: [list]
Types: [list]

Which other BCs will consume this API?

Step 4: Create the structure

DDD - Structure

I will create:
modules/[context]/
├── index.ts           # Public API
├── entities/
├── use-cases/
├── interface-adapters/
└── testing/

+ Glossary: docs/business/glossary/[context].md

Shall we create this structure?

After validation -> Switch to the Architecture skill for tactical details.


Anti-patterns to avoid

  • A single catch-all "domain" module
  • Mixing vocabulary from multiple contexts
  • Circular dependencies between contexts
  • Importing internal files from another BC
  • Naming modules by technical aspect ("services", "models")

References

  • Domain-Driven Design (Eric Evans, 2003) - Chapters 1-4 (strategic)
  • For tactical patterns -> see architecture skill (Clean Architecture)

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Guide for creating optimized Claude Code agents. Use to design a new specialized agent, a swarm sub-agent, or a multi-agent workflow. Follows the Skill → Agent (preloaded skills) → Skill orchestration pattern.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Anti-overengineering guide based on YAGNI. Use before adding an architectural pattern, during code review, or to challenge an overly complex implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Clean Architecture (Uncle Bob) guide for this project. Use when creating modules, entities, use cases, presenters, controllers, gateways, guards, services. Contains tactical patterns and structure conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Audit documentation for duplication, staleness, language issues, and verbosity. Read-only — produces an actionable report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Local auto-review of modified code (no GitLab/GitHub). Runs 5 sequential audits and generates a local report. Ideal for validating code before creating a MR/PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Clean Code (Robert C. Martin) guide to produce and challenge code that is readable, durable, simple, and consistent. Covers naming, functions, comments, smells, and refactor heuristics. Complements `/solid` (SOLID principles) and `/anti-overengineering` (YAGNI/KISS). Activate during the REFACTOR phase of the TDD cycle and during implementation self-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DGouron/review-flow442026년 10월 18일 업데이트

DGouron의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고