Akademisches Studien- und Fristenmanagement mit Quellenprüfung, Datenschutz und realistischer Handlungsplanung.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
8-phase development cycle: Feature requests, current state, functional planning, frontend, backend planning, backend code, tests, use cases. Iterative framework for systematic software development.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Deutsch — Offizielle Deutsch-Version / Documento Oficial en Deutsch.
Goal: Structured process from feature request to validated system. Every development goes through these 8 phases.
📐 Beilage:
SCHALTPLAN-SOFTWAREENTWICKLUNG.html— menschlich lesbarer „Schaltplan der Softwareentwicklung" (HTML, im Browser öffnen): recherchierte Gesamtkarte aus Phasen, Regelkreisen, Rollen, Prozessketten und Test-Gates (Webrecherche 08/2026), in die sich dieser 8-Phasen-Zyklus einordnet.
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| DEVELOPMENT CYCLE |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| Phase 1 Feature Requests (functional requirements) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 2 Check Current State (What already exists?) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 3 Functional Planning |
| (Workflows, Agents, Experts, Skills, Services) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 4 Implement Functional Frontend |
| (Skill files, workflow markdown, agent profiles) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 5 Plan and Align Backend |
| (CLI handlers, DB schema, API endpoints) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 6 Implement Backend Tasks |
| (Python code, tools, DB migrations) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 7 Test Execution, Review Gate and Bugfixes |
| (B/O/E tests, bugfix protocol, code review) |
| | |
| v |
| Phase 8 Functional and Feature Test: USE CASES |
| (End-to-end validation from user perspective) |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
Core principles throughout:
- Functional description first (before code)
- CLI First (everything controllable via terminal)
- Clear separation of user data and system data
- Shift-Left: tests are DESIGNED early (phases 1/3/5) and WRITTEN
with the code (phase 6) - phase 7 only EXECUTES them
What: Collect and formulate functional requirements.
Input:
Output:
Rules:
What: Inventory existing functionality.
Checklist:
[ ] Search existing tools/scripts
[ ] Check documentation/help on the topic
[ ] Check existing skills/agents/services
[ ] Check DB schema (if relevant)
[ ] Check use cases - has something similar been tested?
Output:
What: Plan at the functional level - do NOT write code immediately.
Planning Levels:
| Level | Question | Artifact |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow | WHEN/HOW is coordination done? | workflows/*.md |
| Agent | WHO executes? | agents/*.txt |
| Expert | WHO has domain knowledge? | experts/*/ |
| Skill | WHAT is done? | skills/*.md |
| Service | HOW is it done technically? | services/*/ |
Rules:
What: Create skill files, workflow markdown, agent profiles.
The "frontend" here is the functional description layer:
Output:
What: Align technical architecture to the functional frontend.
Planning Areas:
| Area | Question | Location |
|---|---|---|
| CLI Handlers | Which commands? | handlers/*.py |
| DB Schema | Which tables/columns? | schema/*.sql |
| API Endpoints | Which GUI endpoints? | server.py |
| Tools | Which Python scripts? | tools/*.py |
Output:
What: Write Python code, DB migrations, CLI handlers.
Checklist (per task):
[ ] Unit tests written (TDD: test before code) and green locally?
[ ] Works without user data (empty DB)?
[ ] CLI command available?
[ ] Input can come from files/folders?
[ ] Output goes to structured DB?
[ ] Scan/import is repeatable (idempotent)?
[ ] No hardcoded path?
[ ] Tool registered and documented?
[ ] Help file created?
What: Ensure technical correctness. Tests were DESIGNED in phases 1/3/5 and WRITTEN in phase 6 (Shift-Left) — phase 7 EXECUTES them in staged, blocking gates: fast tests on every commit, expensive tests (full regression, E2E, load) nightly or pre-release. Gate mapping and test selection: software-testing.
Test Types (B/O/E):
| Type | Perspective | Description |
|---|---|---|
| B-Tests | External/Automated | Automated tests, CI/CD |
| O-Tests | Functional (Input->Output) | Manual functional verification |
| E-Tests | Subjective/Experience | UX evaluation, ergonomics |
Review Gate (before Phase 8):
On bugs:
What: End-to-end validation from user perspective.
Use cases serve BOTH purposes:
Use Case Format:
USECASE_NNN: Short Title
PRECONDITION: What must be in place?
INPUT: What does the user enter / what data?
EXPECTED: What should the result be?
TESTS: Which components are tested?
Feedback Loop:
Phase 8 (Use Cases)
|
| New requirements / bugs
v
Phase 1 (Feature Requests) --> Phase 2 (Current State)
^ |
| v
Phase 7 (Tests/Bugs) Phase 3 (Functional Planning)
^ |
| v
Phase 6 (Backend Code) Phase 4 (Functional Frontend)
^ |
| v
+──────────────────── Phase 5 (Backend Planning)
The cycle is a loop: Use cases validate features and simultaneously generate new requirements.
The 8-phase cycle is the OUTER control loop. Inside it, faster loops run concurrently — the further in a loop sits, the faster its takt and the cheaper the fix:
| Loop | Takt | Where in the cycle |
|---|---|---|
| TDD (Red–Green–Refactor) | seconds–minutes | inside Phase 6 |
| Test execution / CI gates | < 10 min per commit | Phase 7 → Phase 6 on red |
| Review gate (4 eyes) | hours | between Phase 7 and Phase 8 |
| Bugfix loop | hours | Phase 7 → Phase 6 (bugfix protocol) |
| Use-case loop | per cycle | Phase 8 → Phase 1 |
| Operations feedback | continuous | monitoring/incidents → Phase 1 |
Rule of thumb: keep commit-to-feedback under 10 minutes — a slow loop gets
bypassed. Visual map of all loops with timings: enclosed
SCHALTPLAN-SOFTWAREENTWICKLUNG.html, sheet BL-2.
| Phase | Specialized skill | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Phases 1-3 | Project bootstrapper (if available) | Create a new project (greenfield) |
| Phase 2 | project-onboarding | Take on an existing project |
| Phases 2-3 | docs-analysis | Check requirement documents against code |
| Phases 5-6 | pipeline-optimizer | Renovate existing structures |
| Phase 7 | bugfix-protocol | Systematic 6-phase debugging |
| Phases 7-8 | bugsweep | Converging bug sweep before a release |
| Phases 1, 3, 7 | software-testing | Choose test levels, types and design techniques; CI/CD gate mapping |
| After Phase 8 | github-repo-care | Release: publish and maintain the repository |
If your skill collection has a skill index, search it for further phase-specific skills.
SCHALTPLAN-SOFTWAREENTWICKLUNG.html (menschlich lesbare Gesamtkarte: Phasen,
Regelkreise, Rollen, Prozessketten, Test-Gates — Synthese einer Webrecherche 08/2026)
plus Verweis im Kopf der DateiCreated: 2026-01-28 | Ported: 2026-03-12
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Akademisches Studien- und Fristenmanagement mit Quellenprüfung, Datenschutz und realistischer Handlungsplanung.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Aktives Lernen, Erarbeitung von Fachinhalten und strukturierte Erstellung von Synthesen.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prüfungsvorbereitung, Selbsttests, Probeklausuren und systematische Fehleranalyse.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT) Стивенса Хейса: модель Гексафлекс с шестью ключевыми процессами психологической гибкости.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) nach Steven Hayes: Hexaflex-Modell mit den sechs Kernprozessen psychischer Flexibilität.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (ACT) según Steven Hayes: modelo Hexaflex con los seis procesos nucleares de la flexibilidad psicológica.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.