본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

buyer-job-intent-analysis

Recover source-bound buyer jobs, struggling moments, desired progress, forces, workarounds, information acts, journey states, criteria, constraints, roles, locales, and authentic language. Use on approved ICP hypotheses plus customer, search, review, forum, procurement, support, or public-market evidence before designing an AI-visibility prompt architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Buyer Job Intent Analysis

Recover what people are trying to accomplish and how they express it. Do not turn product features into imagined demand.

This skill inherits the ethical floor from skills/ETHICS.md. It enforces anti-hallucination, permission, provenance, and decay-aware handling of current market evidence. Anti-spray and human-send are not applicable.

Inputs

Require:

  • approved icp_hypotheses.json;
  • source_manifest.json with permission and provenance;
  • any user-supplied transcripts, queries, reviews, support material, or market sources.

Research missing public-market language when permitted. Prefer evidence in this order:

  1. lawfully collected relevant AI conversations with collection metadata;
  2. customer or prospect interviews and calls;
  3. on-site search, support, chat, sales, and win/loss evidence;
  4. paid-search, Search Console, marketplace, and site-search queries;
  5. public reviews, forums, communities, RFPs, procurement guides, and competitor reviews;
  6. broad search and People Also Ask proxies;
  7. company copy;
  8. LLM expansion.

Public conversational corpora may inform style, turn count, and multilingual naturalness. They must not supply category prevalence or copied prompts.

Grade evidence

GradeMeaningEligible use
ADirect relevant behavior or verbatim customer/prospect language with provenanceWording and exposure-weight inputs
BCredible public-market behavior or search proxy with provenanceWording with an explicit proxy label
CCompany assertion or expert hypothesisResearch hypothesis; approval required
DLLM-generated expansion without independent supportRotating discovery only

A count is a count within the supplied corpus. Never relabel it market frequency.

Extract jobs and language

For each supported ICP, extract:

  • struggling moment or trigger;
  • desired progress or outcome;
  • current workaround;
  • push, pull, anxiety, and habit forces;
  • requested action or information need;
  • decision criteria, constraints, and proof sought;
  • exploration/evaluation state;
  • authentic source-language samples;
  • role/persona and locale when known;
  • contradictory, negative, or post-purchase evidence.

Keep these axes independent:

  • buyer_job;
  • information_act: explain, diagnose, plan, generate, compare, recommend, verify, navigate, buy, implement, troubleshoot;
  • journey_state: problem_identification, exploration, requirements_building, supplier_selection, adoption, post_purchase;
  • optional funnel: TOFU, MOFU, BOFU, or null.

Do not infer funnel from a keyword. A direct-brand support question can be post-purchase; an urgent problem can be close to transaction.

Split a source that asks two materially different things into two candidate jobs or flag it for review. Do not collapse user, champion, buyer, approver, blocker, and post-purchase user.

Build jobs

A job statement should identify the situation, progress, constraints, and affected actor without naming the target product:

When [situation], help [actor] make [progress] while [material constraints].

Link every component to source IDs. If the model adds a plausible force, criterion, or act, mark it grade D, confidence low, and hypothesis_only.

Output

Give the human a readable Markdown report first:

  • strongest jobs by ICP;
  • evidence and exact language worth preserving;
  • conflicts, negative cases, and post-purchase jobs;
  • missing roles/locales/acts;
  • Gate 2 decision: ready_for_human_review, needs_research, or stop_permission_failure.

Then write buyer_jobs.json:

{
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "artifact_id": "jobs-<stable-slug>",
  "created_at": "RFC3339",
  "created_by": "declared agent or human",
  "source_manifest_hash": null,
  "warnings": ["hash_not_computed: compute source_manifest_hash before freeze"],
  "gate_status": "ready_for_human_review",
  "jobs": [
    {
      "job_id": "stable-id",
      "icp_ids": ["icp-001"],
      "statement": "When ..., help ...",
      "struggling_moment": "Evidence-bound trigger",
      "desired_progress": "Evidence-bound outcome",
      "workarounds": [],
      "forces": {"push": [], "pull": [], "anxiety": [], "habit": []},
      "information_acts": ["diagnose", "compare"],
      "journey_states": ["problem_identification", "requirements_building"],
      "criteria": [],
      "constraints": [],
      "roles": [],
      "language_samples": [
        {
          "text": "Short source language",
          "source_id": "source-001",
          "span": "locatable span",
          "locale": "en-CA",
          "evidence_grade": "A"
        }
      ],
      "supporting_source_ids": ["source-001"],
      "counterevidence_source_ids": [],
      "evidence_grade": "A",
      "confidence": "high",
      "status": "supported | hypothesis_only"
    }
  ]
}

Handoff

After human Gate 2, pass only approved jobs, source-language fragments, roles, locales, constraints, grades, and evidence IDs into the blind-design step. Do not pass target names, slogans, desired target pages, current AI answers, or visibility scores.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Select QA-approved canonical intent cells into a versioned AI-visibility tracking panel with partitions, variants, lanes, surfaces, locales, repetitions, separate exposure and priority weights, randomization, uncertainty, refresh rules, and campaign controls. Use after prompt QA or when revising an existing panel.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit, question, suggest, or fact-preservingly revise a press release, blog post, contributed article, or expert explainer so AI answer systems can more easily retrieve, understand, quote, and cite its useful information. Use when someone asks for AI visibility, AI search, answer-engine, AEO, GEO, AI Overview, or ChatGPT citation optimization of supplied writing; when they want an evidence-aware pre-publication audit; or when another Newsjack workflow needs a prose-level AI-discoverability pass. Do not use as a technical SEO audit, rank tracker, publishing system, or promise of rankings, mentions, citations, traffic, or coverage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Research any company, product, or service from a URL plus description and build a comprehensive, evidence-bound AEO/GEO/AI-visibility prompt panel across buyer jobs, information acts, journey states, B0-B5 proximity, aided status, roles, locales, variants, partitions, surfaces, and measurement lanes. Use when a user wants prompts to track in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI search, or answer engines; wants an AI-visibility measurement design; or needs a versioned panel rather than an SEO keyword list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Turn a user-owned coverage CSV and reviewed press-clip captures into an honest, source-linked earned-media dashboard and a motion-designed highlight reel (MP4) that scrolls each real article to the client's sentence and highlights it. Use for coverage reports, earned-media dashboards, campaign recaps, or coverage videos; requires local files and composes press-clip instead of scraping articles itself.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Run a Google Alerts-style keyword coverage tracker. Uses news-search for recent keyword queries, lets the LLM dedupe and classify real features versus junk, stores decisions in SQLite, and alerts only on new real coverage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elvisun/newsjack1.6천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

elvisun의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고