본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

dsh-archive-agent-notes

Use when adding, auditing, pruning, archiving, restoring, or reviewing Agent Notes in deepseek-harness; checks every new note for superseded active records, classifies implemented notes by future decision value, deletes rejected notes that no longer prevent a tempting fallacy, and applies the frozen archived/{kind} triplet and manifest rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml267 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Archive DeepSeek Harness Agent Notes

Reduce the active decision corpus without erasing history that can still guide work. Judge every note semantically; word count and age are discovery aids, never archive criteria.

Read the contracts

Read the Agent Note rules, the archive instructions, and the applicable active lifecycle instructions before classifying. Use current code, configuration, package docs, generated catalogs, newer Agent Notes, and inbound links to establish whether a rationale still owns or constrains anything.

Check supersession when adding a note

Every new Agent Note triggers a scoped audit of active notes covering the same decision, mechanism, or rejected alternative. Classify each full or partial supersession while writing the new note: archive qualifying implemented triplets in the same PR, retain and cross-link partial supersessions or independently useful rationale, reject obsolete proposals, and delete rejected notes that no longer prevent a plausible mistake. Apply the Agent Note consolidation rule when the new owner absorbs every unique proposition; do not defer a known match to a later corpus audit.

Classify by future value

Apply these lifecycle-specific outcomes:

  • Implemented — keep active: retain a note when its rationale, alternatives, negative guarantees, durable/wire semantics, ownership boundary, security rule, or reintroduction condition is likely to guide a future change. Length does not matter.
  • Implemented — archive: archive a note when the shipped decision is complete and its body is unlikely to guide future work, such as one-off UI chrome, a narrow adapter, a minor closed bug, superseded implementation detail, or process history whose current behavior is obvious elsewhere.
  • Proposed — never archive: keep a live proposal active; if it is no longer worth pursuing, reject it with an honest reason and satisfy the rejected lifecycle format.
  • Rejected — keep only as a guardrail: retain a rejection only when the losing proposal remains a tempting, meaningful mistake and the note explains why it loses.
  • Rejected — delete: delete the whole triplet when the rejected idea is obsolete, superseded, no longer plausible, or unlikely to prevent re-litigation. Repair or delete inbound links.

Do not archive toward a quota. Inspect every note in scope, classify analogous groups under one principle, use best judgment for close cases, and record genuinely borderline decisions for the handoff.

Calibrated examples

These examples set the bar; the word counts demonstrate that size is not the test.

Archive implemented notes such as:

  • collapsed sidebar control rail — 533 words: closed, minor UI behavior;
  • Commander argument adapter — 1,498 words: substantial implementation detail with little future design leverage;
  • documentation graph atlas — 920 words: completed documentation machinery whose current generators are authoritative.

Keep implemented notes such as:

  • event-sourced sessions — 248 words: foundational authority and durability boundary;
  • single Harness-home resolver — 596 words: cross-product ownership rule;
  • project session directories — 628 words: durable storage and identity policy;
  • parallel pre-push gates — 400 words: borderline, but still guides gate scheduling and resource tuning;
  • dropped image content block — 334 words: keep until multimodal support lands, because it states the coordinated reintroduction condition.

For rejected notes:

  • keep folding the compaction package split — 426 words: the temptation to merge the packages remains meaningful;
  • delete streaming workflow progress through tool calls — 972 words: its ACP/UI premise is obsolete;
  • delete dropping ACP terminal metadata — 362 words: the later automation-only ACP decision resolved the question.

Archive one implemented triplet

  1. Move the complete foo.md, foo.zh.md, and foo.i18n.yaml triplet from implemented/<kind>/ to archived/<kind>/; implemented is deliberately absent from the archive path.
  2. Make no body edits. Insert only Archived: YYYY-MM-DD immediately below Status: implemented in both language files, using the archival date and the same value on both sides.
  3. Re-record the sidecar hashes mechanically for the two metadata-only edits. Do not translate, reformat, update facts, or repair links inside the note.
  4. Search for inbound links from active prose. Redirect them to current authority, retarget them to the archived path only when the historical snapshot is intentionally cited, or delete them. Never verify or repair links out of the archived note.
  5. Run pnpm run verify-archived-agent-notes --write. Its append-only mode first proves every existing seal still matches, then adds only the new triplet hashes. Run the normal verifier afterward.

After the triplet is sealed, never edit, move, translate, reformat, or delete it. Archived notes remain valid inbound-link targets but are historical snapshots, not authority for current behavior.

Validate and report

Run the archive verifier's focused test, pnpm run verify-archived-agent-notes, pnpm run doc-sync, pnpm run lint, and git diff --check; select any additional evidence through dsh-pre-push-checks.

Report active implemented notes kept, implemented notes archived, rejected notes kept/deleted, proposed notes rejected if any, and every genuinely borderline case with its word count and chosen outcome. Do not claim archived outbound links are valid: the archive verifier intentionally never checks them.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

使用 AACT (Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov) PostgreSQL 数据库进行大批量临床试验历史分析与数据挖掘。触发场景包括:AACT 查询、临床试验批量分析、PostgreSQL 试验数据、全量 NCT 检索、试验数据挖掘、clinical trials data warehouse、疾病领域全景分析、设计相似试验匹配、跨年度试验趋势聚合。本 skill 通过 SQL 接口处理百万级试验记录,支持云端公共 PostgreSQL 服务(aact-db.ctti-clinicaltrials.org)和每日 dump 本地还原两种连接方式,自动检测并优先使用本地高性能模式。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

使用 AACT (Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov) PostgreSQL 数据仓库进行批量、历史、聚合性临床试验数据挖掘。Use this skill when the user requests bulk SQL analysis over the full clinical trials data warehouse — historical trial trends, disease landscapes, similar-design matching, or multi-year aggregations across hundreds of thousands of NCT records. 触发场景包括:AACT 查询、临床试验批量分析、PostgreSQL 试验数据、全量 NCT 检索、试验数据挖掘、历史试验分析、clinical trials data warehouse、SQL trials、bulk trial analysis、disease landscape、试验设计相似性匹配、跨年度聚合、sponsor/phase/country 多维统计。**与 clinical-trials-v2 差异**:本 skill 走批量 SQL · 离线大数据(PostgreSQL);v2 走实时 API · 单查询。两者互补:单条 NCT 实时状态用 v2,百万级历史挖掘用本 skill。支持云端公共 PostgreSQL(aact-db.ctti-clinicaltrials.org · 零部署)和每日 dump 本地还原(高性能 · 离线)两种连接方式,自动检测优先用本地。跨平台(macOS/Linux/Windows)参数化 SQL 防注入,read-only 强制保护。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Create a changeset file in .changeset/ that describes a user-facing change for the release notes

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Add a new competitor to the AI Visibility Tool Directory — researches the tool, generates data, takes a screenshot, and inserts into the codebase

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

add-lang

무료

Add tree-sitter language support to codegraph end-to-end — wire the grammar + extractor, write tests, then benchmark extraction quality and retrieval value on 3 popular real-world repos. Use when the user runs /add-lang <language> or asks to add/support a new language (e.g. Lua, Elixir, Zig, OCaml) in codegraph.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026년 10월 18일 업데이트

EthanYoQ의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고