Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
retention-loops) — the activation event must match the binding loop's first reward, not an arbitrary product step.Do NOT use to design the day-0-to-day-30 milestone path (route to
onboarding-design), the long-running retention loops themselves
(route to retention-loops), or the full visitor-to-paid funnel
diagnosis (route to funnel-analysis).
docs/contracts/mental-models.md § 9.mental-models.md § 16.mental-models.md § 13.context-spine.Inspect the existing definition. Verify by computing correlation between the event and paid conversion / D30 retention on the trailing four cohorts. If r < 0.4 with paid, the event is mis-defined; if r > 0.4 but the event is downstream of paid, it is lagging and useless for in-funnel decisions.
Each candidate is one observable user action that:
For each candidate, compute on the trailing four cohorts:
The candidate that maximises (r-paid × r-retention × coverage) is the binding event. Verify it passes the simplicity check (Occam): if a composite event wins by < 10 % over a simpler single-action event, pick the simpler one.
Write: "For <segment>, activation = <observable action> within <time-to-event window> after signup." The time-to-event window is the median time from signup to event among activated, retained users — not an aspiration. The window is part of the definition; events outside the window do not count.
The activation event is the target of onboarding milestones
(route to onboarding-design for the milestone path that ends at
this event) and the first cycle of the binding retention loop
(route to retention-loops for the loop that begins from this
event). Activation work without these two handoffs is metric
theatre.
Each quarter, recompute the correlation on the latest four cohorts. Segment shape, pricing, or packaging shifts can move the aha moment by one step. Verify the binding event still maximises r × coverage; if a new candidate now wins, propose a redefinition, do not silently switch the event mid-quarter.
WHEN to use this
WHEN NOT to use this
onboarding-design.retention-loops.funnel-analysis.activation-definition.md — segment · observable action · time-to-event window · trailing-cohort correlation with paid and D30 · coverage.candidates-shortlist.md — three candidate events scored by r-paid × r-retention × coverage; simplicity check noted.recheck-cadence.md — quarterly recheck plan: which cohorts feed the recompute · what would force a redefinition · who owns it.B2B mid-market analytics tool, current activation = "user viewed dashboard", D30 retention 58 % despite activation rate 71 %.
onboarding-design); retention loop L1 from retention-loops begins at C1's first cycle. Quarterly recheck owned by RevOps.아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when editing AGENTS.md (package root) or templates/AGENTS.md (consumer) — enforces Thin-Root contract: hard char ceilings, ≥40% pointer ratio, mandatory emergency-triage block.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.