본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

simple-issue-description

Turn rough bug reports, feature requests, support notes, or pull requests into concise issues. Explain the current problem and desired behavior in plain language, preserving useful evidence without prescribing how developers should implement a solution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue focused on the problem and desired behavior. Use when a contributor asks to simplify an issue, explain what a PR is for, create the corresponding issue for a PR, remove implementation detail from a report, or invokes /simple-issue-description.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Simplifying a lengthy bug report
  • Drafting an issue from a pull request
  • Clarifying the intended experience for a new feature
  • Removing unnecessary implementation details from a report

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml262 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Simple Issue Description

Write an issue a maintainer can understand in under a minute. Focus on what someone experiences and what should happen instead.

Workflow

  1. Read the supplied notes, conversation, issue, PR description, or diff. In a PR, also check for spec, design doc, or README changes — they often state the intent better than the description does.
  2. Identify the concrete problem. State who or what is affected when the source makes that clear.
  3. Describe the desired behavior without prescribing an implementation.
  4. Keep only context that helps someone understand or reproduce the problem.
  5. If the source is a PR or diff, describe the problem the change tries to solve, not the files or code it changes.
  6. Draft the issue immediately unless the problem and desired behavior cannot be determined. In that case, ask one short clarifying question.

One issue per problem. If the source bundles unrelated problems, draft the issue for the most significant one, list the others in a line each, and tell the contributor to split them into separate issues and separate pull requests.

If the source adds a capability instead of fixing a misbehavior, do not stage the absence as a bug. Describe what a user cannot do today and the full user experience of the feature: who uses it, from where, and what they see.

Do not invent user impact, reproduction steps, or certainty that the source does not support. If the source only shows cleanup, refactoring, or a possible code smell, say that no concrete problem is clear instead of manufacturing an issue — this rule wins over step 6. Reply with two or three sentences: what the source shows, and what evidence would make it issue-worthy.

If the source fixes a security weakness that is not already public, do not draft a public issue describing it. Suggest reporting it privately to the maintainer instead.

Writing rules

  • Use plain language and short sentences.
  • Keep the issue under 200 words unless it is clear that more is necessary to describe the reproduction steps or a large feature.
  • Lead with behavior, not code, architecture, or the proposed fix. A one-sentence plain-language cause is fine when the symptom cannot be understood without it.
  • Keep technical details only when they are necessary to reproduce or understand the problem. Limits and defaults that make the symptom make sense (batch sizes, quotas, caps) count as necessary.
  • Preserve useful evidence such as error messages, screenshots, links, and documentation references.
  • Do not mention that AI wrote or reviewed the issue.
  • Avoid filler, praise, roadmap language, and exhaustive edge cases.
  • Use the contributor's level of certainty. Do not present a guess as a confirmed bug; write "can" or "appears to" when the source describes a risk rather than an observed failure.

Output format

The first line is the issue title — when filing on GitHub, put it in the title field instead of repeating it in the body. For a missing capability, title the outcome ("Flag pages with no structured data") rather than a fake bug ("Audits never mention structured data").

Omit the Extra context section when there is nothing useful to add. Constraints and scope notes belong there, including what is not affected when a maintainer would reasonably worry that it is.

# <Short title describing the problem or desired outcome>

## TL;DR

<In one or two sentences, explain what happens now and what should happen instead.>

## What is happening?

<Describe the current behavior in plain language. Include a concrete example when available.>

## What should happen?

<Describe the desired behavior without proposing how to build it.>

## Extra context

<Optional reproduction steps, error text, screenshots, links, or constraints.>

Example

# The chat jumps away from messages I am reading

## TL;DR

When I scroll up to read an older message, a new response moves me back to the bottom of the chat. The chat should stay where I left it until I choose to return to the latest message.

## What is happening?

New responses automatically scroll the chat to the bottom, even when I am reading earlier messages.

## What should happen?

Keep my current scroll position and show that a new message is available.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Research questions about a market, examine recorded ChatGPT answers and cited websites, and identify themes where a brand appears or is missing. Receive ranked prompt groups and suggested questions for future tracking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Finding question themes related to a product category
  • Checking brand mentions and cited websites
  • Identifying themes with limited brand visibility
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Audit how a brand appears in AI answers by examining mentions, website citations, competitors, and cited pages. Receive one to three evidence-based priorities, such as improving a page, seeking inclusion in a relevant source, or fixing access barriers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigate why AI answers recommend competitors
  • Check brand mentions and website citations
  • Prioritize pages to improve or create
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Compare several competitors to see which sites lead a search market, what content earns rankings, and where opportunities remain. The report covers keyword reach, links from other sites, and practical next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Identifying leading sites in a search market
  • Comparing competitors' successful content themes
  • Finding underserved topics to target
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Analyze a named competitor's unpaid search traffic, ranking keywords, content themes, and links from other websites. Identify strengths, weaknesses, and relevant opportunities, with an optional comparison to your own site and a report of recommended actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigate a specific competitor's SEO strengths
  • Find pages and keywords worth targeting
  • Compare a competitor with your own site
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Create or update skills using OpenSEO's repository conventions. Keep one canonical source, distinguish internal and public workflows, maintain Claude Code links, and register public skills in documentation, the in-app agent, and plugin bundles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add a new skill to the OpenSEO repository
  • Turn a development workflow into an internal skill
  • Repair drift between skill directories
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

deslop

무료

Edit blog posts, documentation, marketing copy, and PR descriptions to remove formulaic AI writing patterns. Replace filler, vague claims, and staged emphasis with plain statements while preserving concrete details and the writer's voice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Editing AI-drafted blog posts
  • Removing wordy introductions from documentation
  • Toning down exaggerated marketing copy
every-app/open-seo2.4만2026년 10월 14일 업데이트

every-app의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고