본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

elixir-performance-review

Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • references/concurrency.md2.6 KB
  • references/ets-patterns.md2.5 KB
  • references/genserver-bottlenecks.md3.0 KB
  • references/memory.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Elixir Performance Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Mailbox overflow, blocking callsreferences/genserver-bottlenecks.md
When to use ETS, read/write concurrencyreferences/ets-patterns.md
Binary handling, large messagesreferences/memory.md
Task patterns, flow controlreferences/concurrency.md

Review Checklist

GenServer

  • Not a single-process bottleneck for all requests
  • No blocking operations in handle_call/cast
  • Proper timeout configuration
  • Consider ETS for read-heavy state

Memory

  • Large binaries not copied between processes
  • Streams used for large data transformations
  • No unbounded data accumulation

Concurrency

  • Task.Supervisor for dynamic tasks (not raw Task.async)
  • No unbounded process spawning
  • Proper backpressure for message producers

Database

  • Preloading to avoid N+1 queries
  • Pagination for large result sets
  • Indexes for frequent queries

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • Single GenServer for low-throughput - Not all state needs horizontal scaling
  • Synchronous calls for critical paths - Consistency may require it
  • In-memory state without ETS - ETS has overhead for small state
  • Enum over Stream for small collections - Stream overhead not worth it

Context-Sensitive Rules

IssueFlag ONLY IF
GenServer bottleneckHandles > 1000 req/sec OR blocking I/O in callbacks
Use streamsProcessing > 10k items OR reading large files
Use ETSRead:write ratio > 10:1 AND concurrent access

Gates — before reporting

Do these in order for the performance review. Do not publish findings until each step passes.

  1. Protocol loaded — Read review-verification-protocol and apply its checks for each finding (hot paths, concurrency, resource use). Pass: For every substantive finding, you can name which protocol subsection you satisfied or state N/A with reason (e.g. pure reference to this skill’s Valid Patterns).
  2. Anchored evidence — Pass: Each finding includes a concrete locator: path:line (or line range), or Module.function/arity plus a short quoted snippet from the file.
  3. Performance claims — For anything under Context-Sensitive Rules, or any claim of bottleneck, N+1, unbounded growth, or heavy memory/binary cost, Pass: You state the observed or measured fact that meets “Flag ONLY IF” (e.g. rate, item count, ratio), or attach an artifact (profiler output, SQL/log excerpt, grep/search scope)—otherwise downgrade to question / suspected with what was not verified.

Before Submitting Findings

Complete Gates — before reporting (section above) first; the verification protocol is mandatory input to those gates.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adr-decision-extraction

무료

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

adr-writing

무료

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

agent-architecture-analysis

무료

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

ai-elements

무료

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

app-intents-code-review

무료

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

artifact-analysis

무료

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고