본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

fastapi-code-review

Reviews FastAPI code for routing patterns, dependency injection, validation, and async handlers. Use when reviewing FastAPI apps, checking APIRouter setup, Depends() usage, or response models.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB
  • references/async.md6.5 KB
  • references/dependencies.md5.5 KB
  • references/routes.md4.1 KB
  • references/validation.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

FastAPI Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
APIRouter setup, response_model, status codesreferences/routes.md
Depends(), yield deps, cleanup, shared depsreferences/dependencies.md
Pydantic models, HTTPException, 422 handlingreferences/validation.md
Async handlers, blocking I/O, background tasksreferences/async.md

Review Checklist

  • APIRouter with proper prefix and tags
  • All routes specify response_model for type safety
  • Correct HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)
  • Proper status codes (200, 201, 204, 404, etc.)
  • Dependencies use Depends() not manual calls
  • Yield dependencies have proper cleanup
  • Request/Response models use Pydantic
  • HTTPException with status code and detail
  • All route handlers are async def
  • No blocking I/O (requests, time.sleep, open())
  • Background tasks for non-blocking operations
  • No bare except in route handlers

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are idiomatic FastAPI patterns that may appear problematic but are correct:

  • Pydantic validates request body automatically - No manual validation needed when using typed Pydantic models as parameters
  • Dependency injection for database sessions - Sessions come from Depends(), not passed as function arguments
  • HTTPException for all HTTP errors - FastAPI handles conversion to proper HTTP responses
  • Async def endpoint without await - May be using sync dependencies or simple operations; FastAPI handles this
  • Type annotation on Depends() - This is documentation/IDE support, not a type assertion
  • Query/Path/Body defaults - FastAPI processes these at runtime, not traditional Python defaults
  • Returning dict from endpoint - Pydantic converts automatically if response_model is set

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag issues when the context warrants it:

  • Flag missing validation ONLY IF the field isn't already in a Pydantic model with validators
  • Flag missing auth ONLY IF the endpoint isn't using Depends() with an auth dependency
  • Flag missing error handling ONLY IF HTTPException isn't raised appropriately for error cases
  • Flag sync in async ONLY IF the operation is actually blocking (file I/O, network calls, CPU-bound), not just non-async

Gates (FastAPI-specific)

Run once per FastAPI-related finding, after you can anchor file:line for the handler (see review-verification-protocol) and before the finding text ships. If a step’s pass condition is not met, do not assert the finding as written—gather evidence, withdraw, downgrade severity, or rephrase as a question.

Gate 1 — Route decorator and response surface

StepActionPass condition
1aOpen the handler’s route decorator in the repo (not from memory).file:line for @router.* / @app.* (or the site that registers this handler).
1bRecord HTTP method, response_model=, and status_code= on that decorator (or note they are absent).Snippet from that line or explicit absent with the same file:line.

Gate 2 — Blocking or “should be async”

StepActionPass condition
2aRead the full handler body.file:line range covering the body.
2bIf claiming blocking I/O: name each blocking call (e.g. requests., open(, time.sleep, sync DB/ORM).Each call has file:line, or withdraw the finding if none after the read.

Gate 3 — Depends, validation, auth

StepActionPass condition
3aList parameters: Depends / Annotated[..., Depends], Pydantic models, Body/Query/Path, Request/Response.Names + mechanism tied to file:line on the signature.
3bIf claiming missing auth: search the handler file (and its APIRouter module if separate) for Depends, Security, HTTPBearer, or project auth dependencies.Citation to an existing hook, or search result: paths searched + N matches (zero is allowed).
3cIf claiming missing validation: confirm the argument is not already a Pydantic model or constrained Query/Path/Body.Type/source with file:line, or withdraw if validation already applies.

FastAPI Framework Behaviors

FastAPI + Pydantic handle many concerns automatically:

  • Request validation via Pydantic models
  • Response serialization via response_model
  • Dependency injection for cross-cutting concerns
  • Exception handling via exception handlers

Before flagging "missing" functionality, verify FastAPI isn't handling it.

When to Load References

  • Reviewing route definitions → routes.md
  • Reviewing dependency injection → dependencies.md
  • Reviewing Pydantic models/validation → validation.md
  • Reviewing async route handlers → async.md

Review Questions

  1. Do all routes have explicit response models and status codes?
  2. Are dependencies injected via Depends() with proper cleanup?
  3. Do all Pydantic models validate inputs correctly?
  4. Are all route handlers async and non-blocking?

Before Submitting Findings

  1. For each FastAPI-related finding, complete Gates (FastAPI-specific) above.
  2. Load and follow review-verification-protocol (Pre-Report checklist and Verification by Issue Type) before reporting any issue.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고