본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

fetch-pr-feedback

Fetch unresolved review comments from a PR and evaluate with receive-feedback skill

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle스타 85(GitHub 85 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구GitHub

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Fetch PR Feedback

Fetch review comments from all reviewers on the current PR, format them, and evaluate using the receive-feedback skill. Excludes the PR author and current user by default. Line-specific comments belonging to resolved review threads are also excluded by default.

Usage

Invoke the fetch-pr-feedback skill, optionally passing these flags:

fetch-pr-feedback [--pr <number>] [--include-author] [--include-resolved]

Flags:

  • --pr <number> - PR number to target (default: current branch's PR)
  • --include-author - Include PR author's own comments (default: excluded)
  • --include-resolved - Include line-specific comments from resolved review threads (default: excluded)

Instructions

Gates (sequence; do not skip)

Advance only after each Pass when is satisfied.

  1. PR context — Pass when: $PR_NUMBER is set to a positive integer and gh pr view / gh api for that PR completed with exit code 0, or you stop in Get PR Context with only the failure given there (“No PR found for current branch…”).
  2. Fetch — Pass when: the resolved-thread GraphQL call (skipped if --include-resolved) and both paginated gh api … | jq -s -f … runs (issue comments + review comments) exit 0 and parse as JSON (empty [] is valid). On non-zero exit or jq error, stop; surface command stderr—do not invent comments.
  3. Formatted artifact — Pass when: output is either (a) markdown matching Format Feedback Document (header # PR #$PR_NUMBER Review Feedback, per-reviewer ## Reviewer: … with Summary / Line-Specific sections), or (b) exactly: No review comments found on this PR (excluding PR author, current user, and resolved threads).
  4. Load receive-feedback — Pass when: the receive-feedback skill is loaded; only then run that skill’s verify → evaluate → execute loop on that formatted document.

1. Parse Arguments

Extract flags from $ARGUMENTS:

  • --pr <number> or detect from current branch
  • --include-author flag (boolean, default false)
  • --include-resolved flag (boolean, default false)

2. Get PR Context

# If --pr was specified, use that number directly
# Otherwise, get PR for current branch:
gh pr view --json number,headRefName,url,author --jq '{number, headRefName, url, author: .author.login}'

# Get repo owner/name
gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '{owner: .owner.login, name: .name}'

# Get current authenticated user
gh api user --jq '.login'

Store as $PR_NUMBER, $PR_AUTHOR, $OWNER, $REPO, $CURRENT_USER.

Note: $OWNER, $REPO, etc. are placeholders. Substitute actual values from previous steps.

If no PR exists for current branch, fail with: "No PR found for current branch. Use --pr to specify a PR number."

3. Fetch Comments

Fetch both types of comments, excluding $PR_AUTHOR and $CURRENT_USER (unless --include-author is set). Use --paginate with jq -s to combine paginated JSON arrays into one.

Unless --include-resolved is set, first fetch the databaseIds of every review comment that belongs to a resolved review thread. Issue comments (summary/walkthrough) aren't part of review threads, so this only affects line-specific review comments.

Resolved-thread comment IDs (skip this block entirely when --include-resolved is set; set RESOLVED_IDS='[]' instead):

RESOLVED_IDS=$(gh api graphql \
  -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR_NUMBER" \
  -f query='
    query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
      repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
        pullRequest(number: $pr) {
          reviewThreads(first: 100) {
            nodes {
              isResolved
              comments(first: 100) { nodes { databaseId } }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ' \
  --jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[]
         | select(.isResolved)
         | .comments.nodes[].databaseId
         | select(. != null)]')

The first: 100 limits cover typical PRs. For very large PRs (>100 threads or >100 comments in a single thread), thread/comment-level pagination would need to be added; for now, that's a known limitation.

Write jq filters to temp files using heredocs with single-quoted delimiters (prevents shell escaping issues with !=, regex patterns, and angle brackets):

Issue comments (summary/walkthrough posts):

cat > /tmp/issue_comments.jq << 'JQEOF'
def clean_body:
  gsub("<!-- suggestion_start -->.*?<!-- suggestion_end -->"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<!--.*?-->"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*🧩 Analysis chain[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*🤖 Prompt for AI Agents[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*📝 Committable suggestion[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>Past reviewee.*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>Recent review details[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*Tips\\b.*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("\\n?\\n---\\n+(?=\\s*(?:✨\\s*Finishing Touches|🪧\\s*Tips?|🤖\\s*Generated|<sub>|_Generated by|Generated by Claude|Generated with))[\\s\\S]*$"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("^\\s+|\\s+$"; "")
  | if length > 4000 then .[:4000] + "\n\n[comment truncated]" else . end
;
[(add // []) | .[] | select(
  .user.login != $pr_author and
  .user.login != $current_user
)] |
map({id, user: .user.login, body: (.body | clean_body), created_at})
JQEOF

gh api --paginate "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments" | \
  jq -s --arg pr_author "$PR_AUTHOR" --arg current_user "$CURRENT_USER" \
  -f /tmp/issue_comments.jq

Review comments (line-specific):

cat > /tmp/review_comments.jq << 'JQEOF'
def clean_body:
  gsub("<!-- suggestion_start -->.*?<!-- suggestion_end -->"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<!--.*?-->"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*🧩 Analysis chain[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*🤖 Prompt for AI Agents[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*📝 Committable suggestion[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>Past reviewee.*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>Recent review details[\\s\\S]*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("<details>\\s*<summary>\\s*Tips\\b.*?</details>"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("\\n?\\n---\\n+(?=\\s*(?:✨\\s*Finishing Touches|🪧\\s*Tips?|🤖\\s*Generated|<sub>|_Generated by|Generated by Claude|Generated with))[\\s\\S]*$"; ""; "s")
  | gsub("^\\s+|\\s+$"; "")
  | if length > 4000 then .[:4000] + "\n\n[comment truncated]" else . end
;
[(add // []) | .[] | select(
  .user.login != $pr_author and
  .user.login != $current_user and
  (.id as $comment_id | ($resolved_ids | index($comment_id) | not))
)] |
map({
  id,
  user: .user.login,
  path,
  line_display: (
    .line as $end | .start_line as $start |
    if $start and $start != $end then "\($start)-\($end)"
    else "\($end // .original_line)" end
  ),
  body: (.body | clean_body),
  created_at
})
JQEOF

gh api --paginate "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments" | \
  jq -s --arg pr_author "$PR_AUTHOR" --arg current_user "$CURRENT_USER" \
  --argjson resolved_ids "$RESOLVED_IDS" \
  -f /tmp/review_comments.jq

If --include-author is set, omit the --arg pr_author parameter and the .user.login != $pr_author condition from both jq filter files. Keep the $current_user exclusion either way. The $resolved_ids filter naturally becomes a no-op when RESOLVED_IDS='[]' (the --include-resolved path), so leave it in place.

4. Format Feedback Document

Noise stripping — handled by the clean_body jq function in Step 3. Order matters: <!-- suggestion_start -->...<!-- suggestion_end --> blocks are removed first, then remaining HTML comments, then known-noise <details> blocks (Analysis chain, Prompt for AI Agents, Committable suggestion, Past reviewee, Recent review details, Tips), and finally the --- footer boilerplate. The <details> blocks must be stripped before the --- footer pattern because bot analysis chains contain --- separators that would otherwise truncate the actual finding. Substantive <details> blocks (e.g. "Suggested fix", "Proposed fix") are preserved. Comments exceeding 4000 chars after stripping are truncated with a [comment truncated] marker.

Group by reviewer — organize the formatted output by reviewer username:

# PR #$PR_NUMBER Review Feedback

## Reviewer: coderabbitai[bot]

### Summary Comments
[Issue comments from this reviewer, each separated by ---]

### Line-Specific Comments
[Review comments from this reviewer, each formatted as:]

**File: `path/to/file.ts:42`**
[cleaned comment body]

---

## Reviewer: another-reviewer

### Summary Comments
...

### Line-Specific Comments
...

If no comments found from any reviewer, output: "No review comments found on this PR (excluding PR author, current user, and resolved threads)."

5. Evaluate with receive-feedback

Load the receive-feedback skill.

Then process the formatted feedback document:

  1. Parse each actionable item from the formatted document
  2. Process each item through verify → evaluate → execute
  3. Produce structured response summary

Example

# Fetch unresolved reviewer comments on current branch's PR (default)
fetch-pr-feedback

# Fetch from a specific PR
fetch-pr-feedback --pr 123

# Include PR author's own comments
fetch-pr-feedback --include-author

# Include line-specific comments from resolved review threads
fetch-pr-feedback --include-resolved

# Combined
fetch-pr-feedback --pr 456 --include-author --include-resolved

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle852026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고