본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

pydantic-ai-agent-creation

Create PydanticAI agents with type-safe dependencies, structured outputs, and proper configuration. Use when building AI agents, creating chat systems, or integrating LLMs with Pydantic validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구OpenAI
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Creating PydanticAI Agents

Quick Start

from pydantic_ai import Agent

# Minimal agent (text output)
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
result = agent.run_sync('Hello!')
print(result.output)  # str

Model Selection

Model strings follow provider:model-name format:

# OpenAI
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o-mini')

# Anthropic
agent = Agent('anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5')
agent = Agent('anthropic:claude-haiku-4-5')

# Google
agent = Agent('google-gla:gemini-2.0-flash')
agent = Agent('google-vertex:gemini-2.0-flash')

# Others: groq:, mistral:, cohere:, bedrock:, etc.

Structured Outputs

Use Pydantic models for validated, typed responses:

from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent

class CityInfo(BaseModel):
    city: str
    country: str
    population: int

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', output_type=CityInfo)
result = agent.run_sync('Tell me about Paris')
print(result.output.city)  # "Paris"
print(result.output.population)  # int, validated

Agent Configuration

from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.settings import ModelSettings

agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    output_type=MyOutput,           # Structured output type
    deps_type=MyDeps,               # Dependency injection type
    instructions='You are helpful.',  # Static instructions
    retries=2,                      # Retry attempts for validation
    name='my-agent',                # For logging/tracing
    model_settings=ModelSettings(   # Provider settings
        temperature=0.7,
        max_tokens=1000
    ),
    end_strategy='early',           # How to handle tool calls with results
)

Running Agents

Three execution methods:

# Async (preferred)
result = await agent.run('prompt', deps=my_deps)

# Sync (convenience)
result = agent.run_sync('prompt', deps=my_deps)

# Streaming
async with agent.run_stream('prompt') as response:
    async for chunk in response.stream_output():
        print(chunk, end='')

Instructions vs System Prompts

# Instructions: Concatenated, for agent behavior
agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    instructions='You are a helpful assistant. Be concise.'
)

# Dynamic instructions via decorator
@agent.instructions
def add_context(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps]) -> str:
    return f"User ID: {ctx.deps.user_id}"

# System prompts: Static, for model context
agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    system_prompt=['You are an expert.', 'Always cite sources.']
)

Common Patterns

Parameterized Agent (Type-Safe)

from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

@dataclass
class Deps:
    api_key: str
    user_id: int

agent: Agent[Deps, str] = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    deps_type=Deps,
)

# deps is now required and type-checked
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', deps=Deps(api_key='...', user_id=123))

No Dependencies (Satisfy Type Checker)

# Option 1: Explicit type annotation
agent: Agent[None, str] = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')

# Option 2: Pass deps=None
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', deps=None)

Verification gates

Run these in order before depending on an agent in production code:

  1. Smoke run — Execute agent.run_sync('Reply with OK.') (or await agent.run(...) in async code). Pass: the call completes without raising and result.output is present.
  2. Structured output — If you set output_type, prompt for a response that should satisfy the schema. Pass: result.output is an instance of your Pydantic model; repeated validation failures mean tightening instructions or retries, not adding features yet.
  3. Dependencies — If you set deps_type, call run / run_sync with deps= of that type. Pass: the invocation type-checks and completes (or fails only for model/API reasons, not a missing or wrong deps value).

Decision Framework

ScenarioConfiguration
Simple text responsesAgent(model)
Structured data extractionAgent(model, output_type=MyModel)
Need external servicesAdd deps_type=MyDeps
Validation retries neededIncrease retries=3
Debugging/monitoringSet instrument=True

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고