본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

pytest-code-review

Reviews pytest test code for async patterns, fixtures, parametrize, and mocking. Use when reviewing test_*.py files, checking async test functions, fixture usage, or mock patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB
  • references/async-testing.md5.3 KB
  • references/fixtures.md6.9 KB
  • references/mocking.md10.0 KB
  • references/parametrize.md9.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Pytest Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
async def test_*, AsyncMock, await patternsreferences/async-testing.md
conftest.py, factory fixtures, scope, cleanupreferences/fixtures.md
@pytest.mark.parametrize, DRY patternsreferences/parametrize.md
AsyncMock tracking, patch patterns, when to mockreferences/mocking.md

Review gates

Work in order. Do not assert pytest-specific problems until each applicable gate passes.

  1. Scoped files — Pass when: You list every test_*.py and any conftest.py you will cite; no findings for files outside that list.
  2. Async vs sync — Pass when: Per scoped file, you note whether it uses async def test_* / await; if yes, open references/async-testing.md before criticizing async usage.
  3. Fixtures — Pass when: If shared setup matters, you name the conftest.py path(s) or state none; for yield fixtures, confirm cleanup exists before claiming resource leaks.
  4. patch / mocks — Pass when: For any patch or mock critique, you give the import path where the symbol is used (call site), or mark N/A; open references/mocking.md when mocking is central to the review.
  5. Findings — Pass when: Each finding includes a file path and line(s) or test node id, not a generic rule restatement.

Review Checklist

  • Test functions are async def test_* for async code under test
  • AsyncMock used for async dependencies, not Mock
  • All async mocks and coroutines are awaited
  • Fixtures in conftest.py for shared setup
  • Fixture scope appropriate (function, class, module, session)
  • Yield fixtures have proper cleanup in finally block
  • @pytest.mark.parametrize for similar test cases
  • No duplicated test logic across multiple test functions
  • Mocks track calls properly (assert_called_once_with)
  • patch() targets correct location (where used, not defined)
  • No mocking of internals that should be tested
  • Test isolation (no shared mutable state between tests)

When to Load References

  • Reviewing async test functions → async-testing.md
  • Reviewing fixtures or conftest.py → fixtures.md
  • Reviewing similar test cases → parametrize.md
  • Reviewing mocks and patches → mocking.md

Review Questions

  1. Are all async functions tested with async def test_*?
  2. Are fixtures properly scoped with appropriate cleanup?
  3. Can similar test cases be parametrized to reduce duplication?
  4. Are mocks tracking calls and used at the right locations?

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adr-decision-extraction

무료

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

adr-writing

무료

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

agent-architecture-analysis

무료

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

ai-elements

무료

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

app-intents-code-review

무료

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

artifact-analysis

무료

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고