본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

react-router-v7

React Router v7 best practices for data-driven routing. Use when implementing routes, loaders, actions, Form components, fetchers, navigation guards, protected routes, or URL search params. Triggers on createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider, useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, NavLink, Outlet.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(9)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • ACTIONS.md4.1 KB
  • ADVANCED.md4.0 KB
  • LOADERS.md2.1 KB
  • NAVIGATION.md2.7 KB
  • references/actions.md4.6 KB
  • references/advanced.md5.2 KB
  • references/loaders.md2.4 KB
  • references/navigation.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

React Router v7 Best Practices

Quick Reference

Router Setup (Data Mode):

import { createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider } from "react-router";

const router = createBrowserRouter([
  {
    path: "/",
    Component: Root,
    ErrorBoundary: RootErrorBoundary,
    loader: rootLoader,
    children: [
      { index: true, Component: Home },
      { path: "products/:productId", Component: Product, loader: productLoader },
    ],
  },
]);

ReactDOM.createRoot(root).render(<RouterProvider router={router} />);

Framework Mode (Vite plugin):

// routes.ts
import { index, route } from "@react-router/dev/routes";

export default [
  index("./home.tsx"),
  route("products/:pid", "./product.tsx"),
];

Route Configuration

Nested Routes with Outlets

createBrowserRouter([
  {
    path: "/dashboard",
    Component: Dashboard,
    children: [
      { index: true, Component: DashboardHome },
      { path: "settings", Component: Settings },
    ],
  },
]);

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Dashboard</h1>
      <Outlet /> {/* Renders child routes */}
    </div>
  );
}

Dynamic Segments and Splats

{ path: "teams/:teamId" }           // params.teamId
{ path: ":lang?/categories" }       // Optional segment
{ path: "files/*" }                 // Splat: params["*"]

Key Decision Points

Form vs Fetcher

Use <Form>: Creating/deleting with URL change, adding to history Use useFetcher: Inline updates, list operations, popovers - no URL change

Loader vs useEffect

Use loader: Data before render, server-side fetch, automatic revalidation Use useEffect: Client-only data, user-interaction dependent, subscriptions

Gates (decision sequencing)

Answer in order. Pass means the condition is true; pick the API on the same line and stop.

<Form> vs useFetcher

  1. Must the URL or history stack change (bookmark/share, back returns to prior screen)?
    • Pass → <Form> / route action (or useSubmit + navigation). Stop.
    • Fail → Step 2.
  2. Mutation stays on the same route (inline edit, modal, list row, no address change)?
    • Pass → useFetcher(). Stop.
    • Fail → Re-check step 1; you may need a dedicated action route or POST to the current URL.

loader vs useEffect

  1. Is data needed for correct first render (or your intended <Suspense> boundary) for this route?
    • Pass → loader (Framework: clientLoader when appropriate). Stop.
    • Fail → Step 2.
  2. Fetch only after mount from user action, timer, or subscription (not route entry)?
    • Pass → useEffect / event handlers. Stop.
    • Fail → Prefer loader + revalidation over an effect that mirrors navigation.

Additional Documentation

Mode Comparison

FeatureFramework ModeData ModeDeclarative Mode
SetupVite plugincreateBrowserRouter<BrowserRouter>
Type SafetyAuto-generated typesManualManual
SSR SupportBuilt-inManualLimited
Use CaseFull-stack appsSPAs with controlSimple/legacy

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

existential-birds/beagle842026년 9월 16일 업데이트

existential-birds의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고