본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

rseng-science-communication

Covers communicating research software outward to research audiences: supporting the user's software papers (JOSS/SoftwareX-style) with outlines, gathered material and structure - never writing a submission-ready manuscript - plus release announcements, lay summaries of what the software does, talk and poster outlines, blog posts, and making a package findable to its intended users. Use when the user wants to announce, present, promote or explain their research software, asks for help with a software paper, talk abstract or release post, or when a mature package has no visibility beyond its authors. In-repo docs live in rseng-documentation; public and citizen-science narrative in rseng-storytelling; venue mechanics and review preparation in rseng-software-peer-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills스타 24(GitHub 24 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB
  • references.md314 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Communicating research software

Software nobody hears about is software nobody reuses, cites or funds. Communication is part of the engineering lifecycle, not an afterthought: every release, paper and talk is a chance to reach the researchers the software was built for. An agent is well placed to draft these artifacts FROM the repository - README, changelog, docs and citation metadata already contain most of the raw material.

Know the audience before drafting

The same software needs different words for different readers:

  • Domain researchers (potential users): what problem it solves, in domain language - never implementation-first.
  • Fellow developers (potential contributors): architecture, stack, where help is wanted.
  • Non-specialists (funders, institutions, the public): the lay summary - why the research matters and what the software enables, zero jargon, one analogy allowed.

Lead every artifact with the problem solved, not the technology used.

Software papers: support, never authorship

A software paper (JOSS, SoftwareX and domain journals) is the citable face of the package - and it is the USER's publication, not the agent's. The boundary is firm: help with the outline, the research and the brainstorming; gather the raw material (the README's purpose section informs the summary, issues and user questions inform the statement of need, the neighbor comparison from rseng-discovery and rseng-software-reuse informs state-of-the-field); propose structure per the venue's template; critique and fact-check the user's draft (rseng-fact-checking, rseng-citation-hygiene). Never deliver a finished, submission-ready manuscript - a publication that needs an expert's authorship gets an expert's authorship, and the user verifies every claim they sign (rseng-human-verification). AI assistance with the paper is disclosed per the venue's policy (rseng-ai-declaration). Venue mechanics and review preparation live in rseng-software-peer-review; citation plumbing in rseng-citation-metadata.

Release communication

For every meaningful release (rseng-publishing-releasing):

  • A human-readable announcement distilled from the changelog: 2-3 headline changes phrased as user benefit ("fits are ~4x faster on large datasets"), breaking changes with migration one-liners, and install/upgrade command.
  • Post where the software's users actually are - mailing list, community forum, institute news, social media - not everywhere.
  • Time cost is minutes when drafted from a maintained changelog; that is the argument for maintaining one.

Talks, posters and demos

  • Talk outline rule: one idea per slide, problem before solution, a live or recorded demo beats architecture diagrams for software talks.
  • Posters: the software's one-sentence purpose in the title region, a QR code to the repository, and a runnable example as the centerpiece.
  • Prepare the demo against dependency rot: pin the demo environment (rseng-reproducible-environments) and have a recorded fallback.

Findability and sustained visibility

  • The README is the landing page: purpose in the first paragraph, badges that carry information (CI, docs, DOI, review acceptance), a quickstart that works (rseng-documentation).
  • Register where the community looks: a Research Software Directory instance (rseng-software-reuse), domain registries, and the package index's metadata fields (rseng-fair-software).
  • Blog posts for milestones and interesting internals: a "how we made X 10x faster" post recruits both users and contributors.
  • Accessibility applies to communication too: alt text on figures, readable contrast on slides and posters (rseng-ux-accessibility).

Working with this skill

This skill is source-independent: its authority is the community communication guidance linked below.

Learn more (verified):

<!-- related-skills:begin -->

Related skills

Check whether any of these applies before moving on:

  • rseng-citation-metadata - DOIs and citable releases
  • rseng-documentation - README is the landing page
  • rseng-fact-checking - fact-check the draft claims
  • rseng-publishing-releasing - announcements draft from changelogs
  • rseng-software-peer-review - venue mechanics and review prep
  • rseng-storytelling - narrative spine for broad audiences
<!-- related-skills:end -->

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Covers operating AI coding agents securely: auditing whether the agent runs sandboxed, permission and dangerous-command configuration, containerized environments, secrets kept out of context, network egress and token privileges, prompt-injection risk, and the privacy of agent use itself. Use PROACTIVELY when permission gating is broadly disabled (skip-permissions modes), when secrets are visible to the agent's shell, or when the agent processes untrusted code, issues or web content; when a project holds personal or confidential data while a cloud agent is active (what leaves the machine, retention, training use), or when the user asks how to run coding agents safely or privately. (Supply-chain security: rseng-security; disclosing agent contributions: rseng-ai-declaration.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

Covers declaring AI involvement with the AI Declaration Format (https://ai-declaration.org): creating and maintaining an aidecl.yaml that records which AI tools and agents were used, what each contributed, when and how much, plus the README disclosure footnote, JSON/JSON-LD export and CI validation. Machine-readable disclosure is the practice; this format is one implementation. Use PROACTIVELY when an AI assistant or agent creates or modifies a project's content - generate aidecl.yaml if missing, update it after AI-assisted changes. Also use when the user asks about AI transparency, provenance, disclosure or EU AI Act disclosure, wants to state that NO AI was used, or mentions aidecl. For concealment requests see rseng-honesty; for the human review duty see rseng-human-verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

Covers long-term archiving of research software and data: Software Heritage save requests and SWHID persistent identifiers, Zenodo deposits with versioned DOIs and forge integration, choosing domain and institutional repositories, deciding what to archive (code, data, environments, documentation) and when, and archiving at project retirement. Use when the user wants software or data preserved beyond the life of a forge account, grant or lab, mentions Software Heritage, SWHIDs, Zenodo deposits or archiving, retires or hands over a project, prepares artifacts that must stay resolvable for a paper, or when funder policy requires long-term preservation. (Cutting the release itself is rseng-publishing-releasing; day-to-day data storage and repository choice is rseng-data-management.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

Covers processing research data that outgrows one machine's memory: out-of-core and chunked computation, Dask for scaling the scientific Python stack, Spark for distributed tabular pipelines, lazy evaluation, partitioning strategies, idempotent and restartable batch jobs, and knowing when NOT to distribute. Use when datasets no longer fit in memory, when the user mentions Dask, Spark, out-of-core or larger-than-memory data, when a pandas/NumPy workflow hits memory limits, or when designing batch pipelines over many files. (Cluster job submission and job arrays are rseng-hpc-computing; pipeline orchestration engines are rseng-workflows; profile first with rseng-performance-profiling.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

Covers continuous integration and delivery for research software: CI/CD concepts, automating builds and tests with GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD, and wiring an organization's GitLab CI infrastructure to a GitHub-hosted project. Use when the user asks to set up CI, write a pipeline or workflow file (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml), add automated builds/tests on push or pull request, publish a package or deploy docs when a tag or release is cut, cache dependencies to speed up CI runs, choose between GitHub Actions and GitLab CI, use self-hosted or GPU runners, mirror a repo, or report external CI status back to GitHub. For what to test and shrinking a test matrix see rseng-testing; for linter and pre-commit policy see rseng-code-quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

Covers verifying that every citation is real, correct and current: checking references in manuscripts, READMEs, references files and code metadata against Crossref and OpenAlex, screening cited DOIs against the Retraction Watch database, catching fabricated or mis-attributed citations (a documented AI failure mode), and keeping bibliographies and CITATION.cff files resolvable. Use PROACTIVELY before any bibliography, reference list or citation metadata is finalized or published, whenever the agent itself has produced citations, and when the user asks to check references, mentions broken DOIs, retracted papers or citation verification, or prepares a manuscript, README or software paper with references. (Making your own software citable is rseng-citation-metadata.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

fdiblen/rseng-agent-skills242026년 9월 23일 업데이트

fdiblen의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고