본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

bond-verification

Formally verify construction payment bonds by extracting fields from bond documents and cross-referencing against Treasury Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Use whenever the user uploads a payment bond PDF, mentions bond verification, asks "is this bond valid", references AIA A312, or needs to verify a surety company's authority to write bonds. Also trigger on "verify bond", "check surety", "payment bond", "performance bond", or "Circular 570."

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/bond-field-definitions.md1.8 KB
  • references/circular-570-verification.md2.1 KB
  • scripts/validate_bond_verification.py1.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Payment Bond Formal Verification

Verify that a construction payment bond is valid, the surety is authorized, and the bond covers the project requirements. This is the marketplace's trust layer — operators won't bid on tasks without verified payment security.

Workflow

1. Accept bond document

Accept: pasted bond text, PDF file path, or extracted fields (bond number, surety, principal, obligee, penal sum, date). If a PDF, extract text and identify the AIA A312 or ConsensusDocs 260 field structure.

2. Extract bond fields

Identify and extract these fields. Mark each as FOUND or NOT FOUND:

  • Bond number
  • Surety company name
  • Surety NAIC code (if present)
  • Principal (contractor) legal name and address
  • Obligee (project owner / agency)
  • Project description / contract reference
  • Penal sum (bond amount in dollars)
  • Effective date
  • Expiration date (if any — many bonds are open-ended until project completion)
  • Power of Attorney reference
  • Surety agent name and signature

3. Verify surety against Circular 570

Read references/circular-570-verification.md for the verification process.

Check:

  • Is the surety listed on Treasury Circular 570? (federally approved)
  • Is the surety licensed in the project's state?
  • Is the penal sum within the surety's underwriting limit?
  • What is the surety's AM Best rating? (A- or better is standard)

4. Verify bond coverage

Check:

  • Does the penal sum cover the total task value(s) being posted?
  • Is the effective date before or on the task posting date?
  • Does the obligee match the project owner referenced in the RFP?
  • Does the principal match the entity posting tasks on the marketplace?

5. Generate verification report

Output:

{
  "verification_status": "VERIFIED | FAILED | PARTIAL",
  "bond_number": "...",
  "surety": {
    "name": "...",
    "circular_570_listed": true,
    "state_licensed": true,
    "underwriting_limit": "$...",
    "am_best_rating": "A+",
    "naic_code": "..."
  },
  "principal": "...",
  "obligee": "...",
  "penal_sum": "$...",
  "coverage_sufficient": true,
  "effective_date": "...",
  "checks": [
    {"check": "Surety on Circular 570", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Licensed in MI", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Penal sum covers tasks", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Bond is current", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Obligee matches project", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Principal matches poster", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."}
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "requires_human": ["Contact surety to confirm bond is active (not cancelled)"]
}

6. Validate output

python scripts/validate_bond_verification.py < report.json

References

  • references/circular-570-verification.md — How to check Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Includes URLs for Treasury data download and surety verification portals.
  • references/bond-field-definitions.md — AIA A312 and ConsensusDocs 260 field definitions and where to find them in the document.

What this skill explicitly CANNOT do

This skill verifies the bond document against public records. It does NOT:

  • Contact the surety to confirm the bond is still active
  • Verify the Power of Attorney authenticity
  • Provide legal advice on bond adequacy
  • Replace attorney review for disputed bonds

These limitations are stated in every output under requires_human.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

FDU-INS의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고