본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

initial-contact-summary

Generates a structured initial contact summary memorandum from a potential client's first interaction with the firm. Captures case facts, liability indicators, damages, insurance details, and screening criteria. Use during client intake to support conflict checks, case evaluation, and engagement decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Initial Contact Summary

Produces a privileged internal memo from a potential client's first contact — the foundation for conflict checking, case evaluation, and engagement decisions. Mark all output as PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.

Required Inputs

Gather from intake interview, referral, or initial documents:

  1. Contact info — name, phone, email, address, preferred contact method
  2. Incident details — date, location, description of events
  3. Injuries/damages — physical, financial, emotional, property
  4. Parties involved — opposing parties, witnesses, employers, insurers
  5. Insurance — client's and adverse party's coverage
  6. Prior legal actions — existing attorneys, filed claims, administrative complaints
  7. Referral source — how client found the firm
  8. Statute of limitations — calculate deadline; flag if < 6 months

Output Sections

1. Contact Information

Table with: Name, Phone, Email, Address, Preferred contact, Intake date, Intake by, Referral source.

2. Conflict Check

  • List all parties to check: potential client, opposing parties, employers, insurers, witnesses, related entities (parent companies, subsidiaries)
  • Flag: conflict check completed or pending

3. Incident Summary

  • Date/time, location (address + jurisdiction), matter type
  • Chronological narrative in client's own words (use quotation marks for key statements)
  • Police/incident report: number, agency, obtained/requested status

4. Liability Assessment

  • Client's theory of fault
  • Adverse party conduct (specific negligent/wrongful acts)
  • Comparative fault concerns
  • Available evidence: photos, video, documents, electronic data
  • Witnesses: names, contact info, relationship, anticipated testimony
  • Preservation needs: surveillance footage, vehicles, medical devices — flag deadlines

5. Damages

Physical: injuries, treatment to date (providers, facilities), ongoing needs, pre-existing conditions

Economic: medical expenses (current + estimated future), lost wages (dates, rate, employer), property damage, out-of-pocket costs

Non-economic: pain/suffering indicators, daily activity impact, emotional distress factors

6. Insurance

Table with rows for Client, Adverse, and UM/UIM. Columns: Carrier, Policy #, Limits, Claim #, Adjuster.

7. Critical Dates

  • Date of incident
  • Statute of limitations — calculate and prominently display; flag if < 6 months
  • Government claim deadline (if applicable)
  • Insurance claim deadline
  • Evidence preservation deadline

8. Screening Assessment

  • Case strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak — with brief explanation
  • Damages potential: High / Medium / Low
  • Recommended action: Accept / Decline / Further investigation needed
  • Conflicts: Clear / Potential conflict identified

9. Follow-Up Checklist

  • Conflict check completed
  • Statute of limitations calendared
  • Evidence preservation letter sent
  • Medical records authorization obtained
  • Police report requested
  • Insurance claims filed/confirmed
  • Engagement letter prepared
  • Declined letter prepared (if not accepting)

Pitfalls

  • Statute of limitations: always calculate and display prominently — missed deadlines are malpractice risk
  • Conflict check gaps: include all parties and related entities, not just named opponents
  • Narrative inconsistencies: flag contradictions for follow-up rather than resolving them
  • Declining representation: document reason and confirm declination letter includes limitations warning
  • Client demeanor: note emotional state and communication style — relevant to case evaluation

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026년 7월 12일 업데이트

FDU-INS의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고