본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

oma-coordination

Guide for coordinating PM, Frontend, Backend, Mobile, and QA agents on complex projects via CLI. Use for manual step-by-step coordination and workflow guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • resources/examples.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Multi-Agent Workflow Guide

Scheduling

Goal

Guide manual multi-agent coordination for complex work that spans PM, frontend, backend, mobile, and QA responsibilities.

Intent signature

  • User wants step-by-step coordination, manual agent spawning, or multi-domain work planning without full automation.
  • Task spans multiple specialist agents and requires contract alignment.

When to use

  • Complex feature spanning multiple domains (full-stack, mobile)
  • Coordination needed between frontend, backend, mobile, and QA
  • User wants step-by-step guidance for multi-agent coordination

When NOT to use

  • Simple single-domain task -> use the specific agent directly
  • User wants automated execution -> use orchestrator
  • Quick bug fixes or minor changes

Expected inputs

  • Complex feature or project goal
  • Required domains and priority tiers
  • Workspace/session constraints and API/data contract needs

Expected outputs

  • Manual coordination sequence
  • PM task decomposition, agent spawn order, monitoring guidance, and QA review step
  • API/data contract alignment checkpoints

Dependencies

  • PM, frontend, backend, mobile, QA, and orchestrator skills
  • resources/examples.md
  • CLI oma agent:spawn and progress/result memory conventions

Control-flow features

  • Branches by task complexity, priority tiers, dependency ordering, and whether automation is desired
  • Spawns independent same-priority tasks in parallel when appropriate
  • Monitors progress files and contract alignment

Structural Flow

Entry

  1. Confirm the task is complex enough for multi-agent coordination.
  2. Start with PM task decomposition.
  3. Identify priority tiers and shared contracts.

Scenes

  1. PREPARE: Define session, domains, and task decomposition needs.
  2. ACT: Spawn agents by priority with separate workspaces.
  3. VERIFY: Monitor progress and API/data contract alignment.
  4. FINALIZE: Run QA review and coordinate remediation.

Transitions

  • If task is simple, route to one specialist.
  • If user wants automated execution, use orchestrator.
  • If QA finds CRITICAL issues, re-spawn responsible agents.

Failure and recovery

  • If contracts diverge, pause downstream frontend/mobile work until backend/API contract is reconciled.
  • If agent workspaces conflict, split ownership boundaries.
  • If progress stalls, inspect progress files and reissue focused instructions.

Exit

  • Success: specialist outputs are coordinated and QA-reviewed.
  • Partial success: blocked agents, contract conflicts, or QA failures are explicit.

Logical Operations

Actions

ActionSSL primitiveEvidence
Read request and domainsREADUser prompt and project context
Select agent planSELECTPM decomposition and priority tiers
Spawn agentsCALL_TOOLoma agent:spawn
Monitor progressREADprogress-{agent}.md
Validate contractsVALIDATEAPI/data model alignment
Notify coordination statusNOTIFYFinal coordination summary

Tools and instruments

  • oma agent:spawn, PM/frontend/backend/mobile/QA agents
  • Memory/progress/result files
  • Serena MCP for exploration and modification when used by specialists

Canonical command path

oma agent:spawn pm "<planning task>" <session-id> -w ./pm
oma agent:spawn backend "<backend task>" <session-id> -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend "<frontend task>" <session-id> -w ./frontend &
wait

Resource scope

ScopeResource target
LOCAL_FSProgress/result files and workspaces
PROCESSAgent spawn commands
MEMORYSession state and task board
CODEBASEShared contracts and implementation areas

Preconditions

  • Task requires multiple domains.
  • PM decomposition can identify independent priority tiers.

Effects and side effects

  • Spawns or guides multiple agents.
  • Coordinates workspace ownership and QA feedback.

Guardrails

  1. Always start with PM Agent for task decomposition
  2. Spawn independent tasks in parallel (same priority tier)
  3. Define API contracts before frontend/mobile tasks
  4. QA review is always the final step
  5. Assign separate workspaces to avoid file conflicts
  6. Always use Serena MCP tools as the primary method for code exploration and modification
  7. Never skip steps in the workflow — follow each step sequentially without omission

Workflow

Step 1: Plan with PM Agent

PM Agent analyzes requirements, selects tech stack, creates task breakdown with priorities.

Step 2: Spawn Agents by Priority

Spawn agents via CLI:

  1. Use spawn-agent.sh for each task
  2. CLI selection follows agent_cli_mapping in oma-config.yaml
  3. Spawn all same-priority tasks in parallel using background processes
# Example: spawn backend and frontend in parallel
oma agent:spawn backend "task description" session-id -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend "task description" session-id -w ./frontend &
wait

Step 3: Monitor & Coordinate

  • Use memory read tool to poll progress-{agent}.md files
  • Verify API contracts align between agents
  • Ensure shared data models are consistent

Step 4: QA Review

Spawn QA Agent last to review all deliverables. Address CRITICAL issues by re-spawning agents.

Automated Alternative

For fully automated execution without manual spawning, use the orchestrator skill instead.

References

  • Workflow examples: resources/examples.md

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

A fixture whose description uses a YAML folded scalar, which parses with an embedded trailing newline unless normalized before use in Markdown tables.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Draft and revise academic prose against a rubric, evidence, and citation requirements. Use for essays, reports, literature reviews, or academic style audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Architecture specialist for software/system design, module and service boundaries, tradeoff analysis, and stakeholder synthesis. Uses context-aware methods such as diagnostic routing, design-twice comparison, ATAM-style risk analysis, CBAM-style prioritization, and ADR-style decision records.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Backend specialist for APIs, databases, authentication with clean architecture (Repository/Service/Router pattern). Use for API, endpoint, REST, database, server, migration, and auth work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Implement server APIs, authentication, and application data access. Schema modeling and query tuning use oma-db.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent1.4천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

first-fluke의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고