본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ad-campaign-analyzer

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

연동 도구Google AdsLinkedIn
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
  • Reallocate budgets across advertising channels

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md13.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Ad Campaign Analyzer

Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.

Core principle: Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).

When to Use

  • "Analyze my Google Ads performance"
  • "Which ads should I kill?"
  • "Is this campaign working?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad spend?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads"
  • "How should I split my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
  • "Where am I getting the best return?"
  • "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Campaign data — One of:
    • CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager
    • Pasted performance table
    • Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)
  2. Platform(s) — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
  3. Time period — What date range does this cover?
  4. Monthly budget — Total ad spend in this period
  5. Primary goal — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
  6. Target metrics — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
  7. Any known changes? — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
  8. Channels currently running — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
  9. Funnel data (if available):
    • Lead → MQL rate
    • MQL → SQL rate
    • SQL → Close rate
    • Average deal size
  10. Channels you're considering but haven't tried — Want to test new channels?
  11. Constraints — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?

Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization

Accepted Data Formats

SourceKey Columns Expected
Google AdsCampaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value
Meta AdsCampaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS
LinkedIn AdsCampaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads

Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:

DimensionImpressionsClicksCTRCPCConversionsConv RateCPASpendRevenue/Value

Multi-Channel Normalization

When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:

ChannelMonthly SpendImpressionsClicksCTRCPCConversionsConv RateCPAROASCAC*
Google Search$[X][N][N][X%]$[X][N][X%]$[X][X]$[X]
Google Display...
Meta (FB/IG)...
LinkedIn...
[Other]...
Total$[X][N]$[X] avg[X] avg$[X] avg

*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)

Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)

Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)

This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.

Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics

2A: Campaign-Level Health Check

For each campaign:

MetricValueBenchmarkStatus
CTR[X%][Industry avg][Good/Okay/Poor]
CPC$[X][Category avg][Good/Okay/Poor]
Conv Rate[X%][Benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
CPA$[X][Target or benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
ROAS[X][Target or benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
Impression Share[X%][>60% ideal][Good/Okay/Poor]

2B: Budget Waste Detection

Identify spend that produced no or negative return:

Waste TypeSignalAction
Zero-conversion keywords/adsSpend > $[X] with 0 conversionsPause or add negatives
High CPA outliersCPA > 3x targetPause or restructure
Low CTR adsCTR < 50% of campaign averageReplace creative
Broad match bleedSearch terms report showing irrelevant clicksAdd negative keywords
Audience overlapSame users hit by multiple campaignsExclude audiences
Dayparting wasteConversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7Set ad schedule

2C: Winner Identification

Find what's actually working:

Winner TypeSignalAction
Top-performing keywordsLowest CPA, highest conv rateIncrease bid, add variants
Winning adsHighest CTR + conv rate comboScale spend, clone for other groups
Best audiencesLowest CPA segmentIncrease budget allocation
Best timesPeak conversion hours/daysConcentrate budget

2D: Statistical Significance Check

For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):

Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
Confidence level: [X%]
Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]

Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.

Phase 3: Funnel Analysis

Click → Conversion Path

Impressions: [N] (100%)
     ↓ CTR: [X%]
Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
     ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
     ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
Revenue: $[N]

Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis

Drop-Off PointRateBenchmarkLikely CauseFix
Impression → Click[CTR%][Benchmark][Ad relevance / targeting][Copy/targeting change]
Click → Conversion[Conv%][Benchmark][Landing page / offer / audience mismatch][LP optimization]
Conversion → Revenue[Close%][Benchmark][Lead quality / sales process][Qualification criteria]

Phase 4: Budget Reallocation

When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.

4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking

RankChannelCPAFunnel-Adj CACShare of SpendShare of ConversionsEfficiency Index
1[Channel]$[X]$[X][X%][X%][Conv share ÷ Spend share]

Efficiency Index:

  • > 1.0 = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
  • = 1.0 = Proportional (fair share)
  • < 1.0 = Over-invested (getting less than its share)

4B: Marginal Return Analysis

For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:

ChannelCurrent CPAImpression Share / Saturation SignalMarginal Return Estimate
Google Search$[X][X%] impression share — room to growLikely positive
Meta$[X]Frequency [X] — audience may be saturatedDiminishing
LinkedIn$[X]Low volume — limited targeting poolCeiling soon

4C: Funnel Stage Coverage

Funnel StageChannels Covering ItCurrent SpendGap?
Awareness (top)[Meta Display, YouTube]$[X][Yes/No]
Consideration (mid)[Google Search, Meta retargeting]$[X][Yes/No]
Decision (bottom)[Google Brand, Google Search]$[X][Yes/No]
Retargeting[Meta, Google Display]$[X][Yes/No]

4D: Budget Shift Recommendations

ChannelCurrent SpendRecommended SpendChangeReasoning
Google Search$[X]$[Y]+$[Z][Lowest CPA, room to scale]
Meta$[X]$[Y]-$[Z][Audience saturation, frequency too high]
LinkedIn$[X]$[Y]$0[Maintain — niche but valuable]
[New channel]$0$[Y]+$[Y][Test budget — competitors succeeding here]
Total$[X]$[X]$0Budget-neutral reallocation

4E: Scenario Modeling

Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
  • Risk: Low

Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X]
  • Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels

Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo

  • Recommended allocation: [table]
  • Expected conversions: [N]
  • New channels to test: [list]

Phase 5: Output Format

# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Period: [Date range]
Total spend: $[X]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]

---

## Performance Dashboard

| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |

---

## Budget Waste Report

**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**

### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]

### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
[List of items with CPA > 3x target]

### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
[Specific items to pause]

---

## Winners to Scale

### Top Keywords/Audiences
| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|

### Top Ads
| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
|----|-----|----------|-------------|

---

## A/B Test Results

### [Test Name]
- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Confidence: [X%]
- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]

---

## Budget Reallocation

### Current vs Recommended Allocation

| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |

**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])

### Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]

### New Channel Recommendations

#### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]

---

## Action Plan

### Immediate (This Week)
- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]

### This Month
- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns

### Next Month
- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]

Save to campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Data analysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Statistical calculationsFree
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
  • User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot

Trigger Phrases

  • "Analyze my ad campaign performance"
  • "Which ads should I pause?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad budget?"
  • "Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
  • "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend"
  • "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
  • "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Create and fix Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript, Adobe’s JavaScript-based scripting language. Automate changes to artwork, text, layers, and artboards, process multiple files, and prepare exports such as PDF, SVG, and PNG.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Automate repeated changes to artwork and text
  • Export multiple Illustrator files
  • Generate artwork variations from data
github/awesome-copilot4만2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

github의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고