본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

context-templates

Shared context template library for setup-skills. Read when discovering context documents or their ownership. This library supplies research inputs, not active product context or a separate authoring workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(8)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • ACCESSIBILITY.md1.9 KB
  • BROWSER-VALIDATION.md7.1 KB
  • DESIGN-SYSTEM.md5.7 KB
  • PRODUCT-DESIGN.md8.2 KB
  • REPOSITORY.md3.9 KB
  • RESPONSIVE-DESIGN.md1.7 KB
  • SEED-DATA.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Shared context templates

This directory is the only editable template library. It is copied with the starter beside .agents/skills/. Do not duplicate templates inside individual skills or infer approved context from templates themselves.

Documents and research sources

Plain setup selects every document below once. For a named consumer, read its required-context declaration, including any linked reference that owns that declaration, and select its required and conditional documents once. Do not maintain a second consumer dependency map here. Users can also name documents directly. This entrypoint is not itself a context document.

DocumentSource groups
DESIGN-SYSTEM.mddesign-system
PRODUCT-DESIGN.mdproduct
REPOSITORY.mdrepository
SEED-DATA.mdproduct, repository
RESPONSIVE-DESIGN.mdproduct
ACCESSIBILITY.mdproduct, repository
BROWSER-VALIDATION.mdrepository

Source groups identify research ownership. design-system and product select the six shared intake questions in setup-skills' references/source-workflow.md. The repository group selects automatic, bounded, read-only research of the current consumer checkout under that workflow, not a source/permission question. Repository-only selection needs no intake answers. Missing repository answers or file registrations do not block this local scope. Other groups' research is not automatically authorized by a file being local. Collect each applicable question once across selected documents. Preserve all restrictions and explicit skips, including legacy repository opt-outs, and honor content exclusions. Volunteered docs add leads, not a new required question. Bounded proposals live in PRODUCT-DESIGN.md and apply only where permitted, never as researched product policy. An empty source registry does not disable automatic local research. Excluded, missing or inaccessible evidence must produce specific limitations, not fictional facts or replacement research against a skip.

Optional owner topics

Keep all seven root identities. Authors may keep a document whole or move task-specific detail into directly linked owner topics when supported tasks can skip genuinely irrelevant detail. Choose boundaries by task applicability and cohesion: keep a decision's requirements, conditions, exceptions, examples and citations together. Keep short, cohesive guidance whole when splitting would only add navigation. Check evidenced consumer constraints, such as incoming anchors or a parser that requires a particular structure, before moving content; do not assume one consumer's constraints apply to others. Observed oversized or truncated reads can motivate review, but file size, consistency with other owners or a fixed topic count does not justify a split. Splitting alone does not establish faster discovery or better task outcomes. Preserve correct existing text and its authority and historical qualifications; relocation is not permission to rewrite policy or claim fresh verification. Do not physically split every template or add new owners, intake or authors. Roots retain authority, common rules, universal obligations, known gaps and direct links to every topic with concrete applicability conditions. New topics use the owner's exclusive topics/<DOCUMENT-STEM>/ directory within active context; existing linked paths need preservation and explicit inventory.

Each trigger covers normal successful work and readiness as well as relevant failure/recovery work. For example, supported component selection, opening and checking an ordinary preview, and adding valid fixtures must select their applicable details before a failure occurs. Avoid read-all lists and topic chains. Each topic keeps complete usable rules, examples, conditions, exceptions and citations. Shared-owner links transfer ownership, not duplicate policy.

Apply setup's complete-set authoring, preservation and approval contract to roots and topics together. Library templates are research prompts, not approved consumer guidance or permission to activate extra files.

Location

Setup reads this library from .agents/context-templates/ in the current prototype repository. It does not fetch or install another copy. Context documents become active only after separate explicit approval.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audits actual components and routes against applicable WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria using consumer-owned design-system evidence and repository tools. Use when asked for an accessibility audit, a11y check, keyboard or focus review, contrast check, or screen-reader verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Creates or updates believable deterministic raw fixture scenarios without breaking an existing prototype. Use when asked to add or change fixtures, seed data, sample data, scenarios, or cross-record relationships. Not for UI redesign, live-data infrastructure, or unrelated commands.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Use for explicit agent-browser CLI checks or a named browser capability neither the Copilot canvas nor configured Playwright MCP can supply. Ordinary rendered checks and browser selection belong to browser-canvas-validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Use the Copilot browser canvas first for rendered route checks, interaction tests, screenshots and visual, responsive or accessibility evidence. Use configured isolated Playwright MCP only when the canvas is unavailable for a required check.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Review Replica pull requests using the same shared conventions and project guides as implementation agents. Use when reviewing changes to code, tests, workflows, or documentation in this repository.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Reviews existing UI components for design-system consistency, states, responsiveness and accessibility using consumer-owned context. Use when asked to review component quality, check design-system adherence or audit component consistency.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

github/replica142026년 10월 17일 업데이트

github의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고