본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

churn-risk-detector

Scan support tickets, Slack channels, NPS scores, and usage patterns to flag accounts showing early churn indicators. Produces a weekly risk scorecard with severity tiers, root cause hypotheses, and suggested save plays per account. Designed for seed/Series A teams where the founder or a single CSM manages all accounts manually.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구Slack

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • skill.meta.json259 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Churn Risk Detector

Surface accounts at risk of churning before it's too late. Aggregates signals from support, communication, and usage patterns into a scored risk report with specific save actions.

Built for: Early-stage teams with no CS platform (no Gainsight, no ChurnZero). You have a spreadsheet of customers, a Slack channel, and a support inbox. This skill turns those raw signals into an actionable churn risk list.

When to Use

  • "Which customers are at risk of churning?"
  • "Run the weekly churn risk scan"
  • "Flag accounts I should worry about"
  • "Who haven't we heard from in a while?"
  • "Produce a customer health report"

Phase 0: Intake

Account Data

  1. Customer list — CSV or sheet with: company name, primary contact email, contract value (MRR/ARR), contract start date, renewal date (if known)
  2. Product/service type — What are they paying for? (Helps calibrate expected engagement)

Signal Sources (provide what you have)

  1. Support tickets — Export from Intercom, Zendesk, or email (CSV with: customer, date, subject, status, resolution time)
  2. Slack channel history — Customer Slack channel or shared channel messages
  3. NPS/CSAT scores — Recent survey results with scores and comments
  4. Usage data — Any metrics you track: logins, API calls, features used, active users (CSV export)
  5. Email/communication log — Last touchpoints per account (dates + context)
  6. Billing data — Payment failures, downgrades, discount requests

Calibration

  1. What does "healthy" look like? — Describe a healthy customer (e.g., "logs in daily, uses 3+ features, responds to emails within 24h")
  2. Known churn reasons — Why have customers churned in the past? (helps weight signals)

Phase 1: Signal Extraction

1A: Support Signal Analysis

From support ticket data, calculate per account:

SignalCalculationRisk Weight
Ticket volume spike>2x their average in last 30 daysHigh
Unresolved ticketsOpen tickets older than 7 daysHigh
Escalation languageKeywords: "cancel", "frustrated", "alternative", "not working", "disappointed"Critical
Response time degradationYour avg response time to this customer trending upMedium
Repeat issuesSame problem reported 2+ timesHigh

1B: Communication Signal Analysis

From Slack/email history:

SignalCalculationRisk Weight
Gone silentNo messages in 30+ days (was previously active)High
Decreasing frequencyMessage frequency dropped >50% vs prior 90 daysMedium
Negative sentiment shiftTone changed from positive to neutral/negativeMedium
Champion disengagementPrimary contact stopped respondingCritical
New stakeholder questionsNew person asking basic "what does this do?" questionsMedium (potential reorg)

1C: Usage Signal Analysis (if data available)

SignalCalculationRisk Weight
Login dropActive users down >30% vs prior monthHigh
Feature abandonmentStopped using a key feature they previously used regularlyHigh
Shallow usageOnly using 1 feature when they're paying for manyMedium
No growthSame number of seats/users for 6+ monthsLow
Export spikeSudden increase in data exportsCritical (may be migrating)

1D: Commercial Signal Analysis

SignalCalculationRisk Weight
Discount requestAsked for pricing reductionHigh
Downgrade inquiryAsked about lower tierCritical
Payment failureFailed payment not resolved in 7+ daysHigh
Contract approaching renewal<60 days to renewal with no renewal discussionMedium
Competitor mentionMentioned a competitor in any channelHigh

Phase 2: Risk Scoring

Scoring Model

Each account gets a composite risk score (0-100):

Risk Score = Σ (signal_weight × signal_present)

Weights:
  Critical signal = 25 points each
  High signal     = 15 points each
  Medium signal   = 8 points each
  Low signal      = 3 points each

Score cap: 100

Risk Tiers

TierScoreLabelAction Urgency
Red70-100Critical risk — likely to churnThis week
Orange40-69Elevated risk — needs attentionWithin 2 weeks
Yellow20-39Early warning — monitor closelyWithin 30 days
Green0-19Healthy — no action neededRoutine check-in

Phase 3: Save Play Generation

For each Red and Orange account, generate a specific save play:

Save Play Template

ACCOUNT: [Company Name]
RISK TIER: [Red/Orange]
RISK SCORE: [X/100]
MRR/ARR: $[X]

SIGNALS DETECTED:
- [Signal 1] — [Evidence: specific data point]
- [Signal 2] — [Evidence]
- [Signal 3] — [Evidence]

ROOT CAUSE HYPOTHESIS:
[1-2 sentences: What do you think is actually going wrong?
 E.g., "Champion left the company and new stakeholder hasn't been onboarded"
 or "They hit a technical limitation with [feature] that's blocking their primary use case"]

RECOMMENDED SAVE PLAY:
1. [Immediate action — e.g., "Schedule a call with [contact] this week"]
2. [Follow-up — e.g., "Send a personalized Loom showing how to solve [specific issue]"]
3. [Structural fix — e.g., "Assign a dedicated onboarding session for new stakeholder"]

TALK TRACK:
"[2-3 sentences the CSM/founder can use to open the conversation naturally,
 without saying 'we noticed you might be churning']"

ESCALATION TRIGGER:
If [specific condition] by [date], escalate to [founder/CEO call].

Phase 4: Output Format

# Churn Risk Report — Week of [DATE]
Total accounts scanned: [N]
Data sources: [list what was available]

---

## Risk Summary

| Tier | Count | Total MRR at Risk |
|------|-------|-------------------|
| 🔴 Red (Critical) | [N] | $[X] |
| 🟠 Orange (Elevated) | [N] | $[X] |
| 🟡 Yellow (Early Warning) | [N] | $[X] |
| 🟢 Green (Healthy) | [N] | $[X] |

**Total MRR at risk (Red + Orange):** $[X] ([Y]% of total MRR)

---

## 🔴 Critical Risk Accounts

### [Company Name 1] — Score: [X]/100 | MRR: $[X]
**Signals:** [bullet list]
**Root cause:** [hypothesis]
**Save play:** [specific actions]
**Owner:** [who should act]
**Deadline:** [date]

### [Company Name 2] — ...

---

## 🟠 Elevated Risk Accounts

### [Company Name] — Score: [X]/100 | MRR: $[X]
**Signals:** [bullet list]
**Recommended action:** [1-2 sentences]

---

## 🟡 Early Warning Accounts

| Account | Score | Key Signal | Suggested Action |
|---------|-------|------------|-----------------|
| [Name] | [X] | [Signal] | [Action] |
| [Name] | [X] | [Signal] | [Action] |

---

## Trends vs Last Week

- Accounts moved Red → Green: [list — wins!]
- Accounts moved Green → Yellow/Orange: [list — new risks]
- Accounts churned since last report: [list]

---

## Signal Distribution

| Signal Type | Accounts Affected |
|------------|-------------------|
| Support ticket spike | [N] |
| Gone silent | [N] |
| Usage decline | [N] |
| Competitor mention | [N] |
| Payment issue | [N] |
| Champion disengagement | [N] |

---

## Recommended Focus This Week

1. **[Account]** — [Why + what to do]
2. **[Account]** — [Why + what to do]
3. **[Account]** — [Why + what to do]

Save to risk-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory.

Scheduling

Run weekly:

0 8 * * 1 python3 run_skill.py churn-risk-detector --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
All signal analysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Slack/email parsingFree
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • Input data from CSV/sheets (support tickets, usage, NPS)
  • Optional: Slack channel reading for communication signals
  • No external API costs — pure analysis

Trigger Phrases

  • "Which customers are at risk?"
  • "Run the churn risk scan"
  • "Weekly customer health report"
  • "Flag at-risk accounts"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

gooseworks-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고