본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

create-x-content

Draft voice-tuned X (Twitter) post variants from a free-form brief. Reads a personal voice guide (generated via generate-voice-guide), produces 2–5 variants with distinct framings (simple-howto, problem-first, hype, mechanism-breakdown, etc.), and self-checks against the voice guide's banned phrases before returning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구X (Twitter)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • skill.meta.json268 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Create X Content

Draft X/Twitter post variants that sound like you, not like an AI. Reads a voice guide the user has already generated (or prompts to create one), produces multiple framings of the same idea, and saves each variant as its own markdown file with frontmatter.

This is an agent-executed skill — the agent does the drafting and self-check inline. No Python script.

Quick Start

/create-x-content --brief "New open-source CLI that turns Figma files into React components. Called figma2react. Free, MIT licensed."

Or interactively:

/create-x-content

Inputs

FlagRequiredDefault
--briefYes (asked interactively if missing)—
--variantsNoSkill decides based on brief richness (2–5)
--voice-guideNoResolved via chain below
--outputNo./content/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic-slug>/
--topicNoDerived from brief

Voice Guide Resolution

Resolve in this order, stop at first hit:

  1. --voice-guide <path> flag
  2. ~/.goose-skills/config.json → voice_guides.x
  3. ~/.goose-skills/voice-guides/voice-x.md (default path)
  4. Fallback prompt — no guide found. Give the user three options:
    • (a) Paste a path to an existing guide
    • (b) Run /generate-voice-guide --platforms x now to create one (recommended)
    • (c) Proceed with a neutral default (warn that variants will sound generic)

Never silently skip the voice guide. Generic posts are the failure mode to avoid.

Workflow

Phase 1 — Load the voice guide

Read the resolved voice guide into context. Extract, for use throughout drafting:

  • Banned phrases — treat as hard blocks
  • Hook patterns — sample these for variant framings
  • Format rules — length ranges, line-break style, emoji policy
  • Dos/don'ts — apply to every variant
  • Example posts — use as calibration targets

Phase 2 — Parse the brief and decide variant count

Decide variant count by richness:

  • 2 variants — one-line opinions, single-angle hot takes, simple tool mentions with no mechanism
  • 3 variants — typical tool spotlights, single how-tos, observations with one clear angle
  • 4 variants — multi-angle topics (a how-to + a problem-first frame + a hype frame + a mechanism breakdown)
  • 5 variants — rich, mechanism-heavy content where several distinct hooks all have real substance

If --variants is explicitly set, respect it. Otherwise pick the smallest count where each variant genuinely adds a different angle. Quality > quantity. 2 strong variants beat 5 watered-down ones.

Phase 3 — Generate variants with explicit framing

Each variant gets a distinct framing label that determines its structure and hook:

FramingStructureWhen to use
simple-howtoBare steps, no mechanismTool install + usage, 2–3 line how-to
howto-plus-mechanismHow-to + "here's how it works" breakdownTools where the mechanism is interesting
problem-firstOpen with the pain, then solutionWhen the problem is visceral/relatable
hypePunchy "someone just dropped X" energyLaunches, new OSS releases, cool builds
mechanism-breakdownFocus on the howTechnical builds, systems, architectures
ecosystem-mapCurated list of N related tools/companiesLandscape posts
contrarian"Most people do X wrong" openerOpinion pieces with a clear counter-take
personal-experience"We've been doing X. Here's what I learned"Field notes, lessons learned

Use framings the voice guide's hook patterns actually support. Don't force framings the user never employs.

Phase 4 — Self-check against the voice guide

Before saving, run each variant through these checks:

  1. Banned phrase check — does the variant use any phrase from the voice guide's banned list? If yes, rewrite that line.
  2. Length check — does it fit the voice guide's format rules (short-form <280, long-form 100–1000, etc.)?
  3. "Meat" check — does it have at least one concrete reference: a specific tool, number, workflow, or build? If not, it's filler — rewrite.
  4. Voice-match spot check — would this plausibly appear in the example posts section of the voice guide? If it reads like a generic AI tweet, rewrite.

If a variant fails any check and two rewrite attempts don't fix it, drop the variant rather than ship something weak.

Phase 5 — Save outputs

Write each variant as its own .md file. File naming:

variant-<letter>-<framing-slug>.md

Examples: variant-a-simple-howto.md, variant-b-problem-first.md.

Frontmatter schema:

---
id: <topic-slug>-<letter>
platform: x
format: short | long
topic: <slug>
framing: <framing-slug>
status: draft
---

Body: just the post text. No commentary, no surrounding markdown.

Phase 6 — Deliver

Print to the user:

  • Output directory path
  • List of files created
  • Variant count + framings used
  • Suggested next step (review, tweak, or run /social-kit for a matching graphic)

Outputs

  • <output>/variant-<letter>-<framing>.md per variant
  • No index file — each variant is self-contained

Examples

Simple brief:

/create-x-content --brief "npx goose-skills install claude-code-hooks — a new skill that adds pre-commit, pre-tool-use, and post-response hooks to Claude Code so you can enforce coding standards automatically."

→ 3 variants (howto, hype, mechanism)

Rich brief:

/create-x-content --brief "Built a Claude-driven lead gen system. Scrapes Reddit for people asking about email deliverability, finds their domains, verifies their business email via Hunter, drafts a personalized DM. 47 leads in 6 hours at $0.03/lead."

→ 5 variants (personal-experience, mechanism-breakdown, hype, problem-first, simple-howto)

Dependencies

  • A voice guide at the resolved path (see Voice Guide Resolution above)
  • generate-voice-guide skill (for creating one when missing)

Tips

  • Default to fewer variants. Five weak ones is worse than two strong ones. The skill should feel picky, not generous.
  • Framings must actually differ. Don't write five variants with the same opening hook and minor tweaks. Each variant = a different lens on the same idea.
  • Quote the brief's specifics verbatim in the variant. Numbers, tool names, prices — these are the "meat." Losing them to paraphrasing kills the post.
  • If the voice guide has a "field-notes deep-dive" hook pattern and the brief is rich enough, include one long-form variant. That format tends to outperform on X.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

gooseworks-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고